<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The burden of a paper image (Bas Timmers)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/10/08/the-burden-of-a-paper-image-bas-timmers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/10/08/the-burden-of-a-paper-image-bas-timmers/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: All quiet on the western front? Not quite. &#171; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/10/08/the-burden-of-a-paper-image-bas-timmers/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>All quiet on the western front? Not quite. &#171; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/10/08/the-burden-of-a-paper-image-bas-timmers/#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>[...] Bas Timmers wrote, such a shift in scope will come at the expense of traditional brand names. Der Westen already [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bas Timmers wrote, such a shift in scope will come at the expense of traditional brand names. Der Westen already [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bas Timmers</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/10/08/the-burden-of-a-paper-image-bas-timmers/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas Timmers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/10/08/the-burden-of-a-paper-image-bas-timmers/#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>Nico, you might be right when the subject is a single event, such as elections. Then it might be appropriate to make a new, totally different site. But building up a new audience can take time. We at Volkskrant for instance have developed separate domains for cinema, for travelling, for wellness and for jobs. Most of these sites don&#039;t really connect to eachother. The question is: is that good or not???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nico, you might be right when the subject is a single event, such as elections. Then it might be appropriate to make a new, totally different site. But building up a new audience can take time. We at Volkskrant for instance have developed separate domains for cinema, for travelling, for wellness and for jobs. Most of these sites don&#8217;t really connect to eachother. The question is: is that good or not???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nico.</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/10/08/the-burden-of-a-paper-image-bas-timmers/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>nico.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/10/08/the-burden-of-a-paper-image-bas-timmers/#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>Given the ridiculous price of setting up a website compared to a new publication, I&#039;d say media companies should develop a large portfolio of brands and share content across them.

I like French broadcaster TF1&#039;s website for the 7-12 demographics, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tfou.fr/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tfou.com&lt;/a&gt; (especially &#039;cause you can play pollypockets). Same corporate brand, but it hardly looks like the main brand&#039;s website &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tf1.fr&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TF1.fr&lt;/A&gt; or the high-achievers&#039; one &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lci.fr&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LCI.fr&lt;/a&gt;.

Some papers also set up new brands for special events, such as the short-lived Quelcandidat.com for the French election. With fresh new brands like these, newspapers can draw on their staff&#039;s competencies without dragging their offline brand behind them (when you&#039;re a minor regional player launching a nationwide website you don&#039;t want your mediocre offline reputation to follow you everywhere).

So keep the boring brand name and website for your unmovable, loyal over-50 readers and innovate with new brands for your more unpredictable and more valuable younger ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the ridiculous price of setting up a website compared to a new publication, I&#8217;d say media companies should develop a large portfolio of brands and share content across them.</p>
<p>I like French broadcaster TF1&#8242;s website for the 7-12 demographics, <a href="http://www.tfou.fr/" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.tfou.fr/?referer=');">tfou.com</a> (especially &#8217;cause you can play pollypockets). Same corporate brand, but it hardly looks like the main brand&#8217;s website <a href="http://www.tf1.fr" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.tf1.fr?referer=');">TF1.fr</a> or the high-achievers&#8217; one <a href="http://www.lci.fr" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.lci.fr?referer=');">LCI.fr</a>.</p>
<p>Some papers also set up new brands for special events, such as the short-lived Quelcandidat.com for the French election. With fresh new brands like these, newspapers can draw on their staff&#8217;s competencies without dragging their offline brand behind them (when you&#8217;re a minor regional player launching a nationwide website you don&#8217;t want your mediocre offline reputation to follow you everywhere).</p>
<p>So keep the boring brand name and website for your unmovable, loyal over-50 readers and innovate with new brands for your more unpredictable and more valuable younger ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

