<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advice for someone with a big story, but no evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/10/30/advice-for-someone-with-a-big-story-but-no-evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/10/30/advice-for-someone-with-a-big-story-but-no-evidence/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Booth</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/10/30/advice-for-someone-with-a-big-story-but-no-evidence/#comment-3246</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/10/30/advice-for-someone-with-a-big-story-but-no-evidence/#comment-3246</guid>
		<description>If your correspondent is the key witness their starting point could be to write down what they saw (their evidence) and approach a lawyer to set it down as an avidavit.

That of course does not prevent what they say being libellous - yet it may boost the confidence of any journalist they approach.
As Bas suggests - if they are the only evidence - their case is may be explosive but based entirely on their credibility versus the credibility of those they accuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your correspondent is the key witness their starting point could be to write down what they saw (their evidence) and approach a lawyer to set it down as an avidavit.</p>
<p>That of course does not prevent what they say being libellous &#8211; yet it may boost the confidence of any journalist they approach.<br />
As Bas suggests &#8211; if they are the only evidence &#8211; their case is may be explosive but based entirely on their credibility versus the credibility of those they accuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bas Timmers</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/10/30/advice-for-someone-with-a-big-story-but-no-evidence/#comment-3245</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas Timmers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/10/30/advice-for-someone-with-a-big-story-but-no-evidence/#comment-3245</guid>
		<description>Extremely difficult issue. If there were other people at the occasion, approach them as a witness. But probably that isn&#039;t the case. I would then firstly approach a blogger that is a specialist in the subject at hand and make the deal to publish together, at the same time, if evidence is found. If this isn&#039;t an option as well, find a journalist of whom you suspect he has the proper contacts to confirm the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extremely difficult issue. If there were other people at the occasion, approach them as a witness. But probably that isn&#8217;t the case. I would then firstly approach a blogger that is a specialist in the subject at hand and make the deal to publish together, at the same time, if evidence is found. If this isn&#8217;t an option as well, find a journalist of whom you suspect he has the proper contacts to confirm the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

