<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Yoosk?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/12/12/review-yoosk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/12/12/review-yoosk/</link>
	<description>This is a conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:06:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hood</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/12/12/review-yoosk/comment-page-1/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/12/12/review-yoosk/#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>Hi Gabriela,
Thanks for a very thoughtful review of our site. You made some very perceptive comments on what we need to improve and I&#039;m pleased to say that we are already working on these...

You rightly suggest that at first getting answers (and therefore content) is going to be one of the biggest challenges we face. In fact we have set out to get a &#039;commitment to answer&#039; from the public figures in the Yoosk features before we post them in the &#039;Committed Features&#039; section, just as you suggest.

The next step is to systematically approach PR agents and spokepeople to get them to agree to answer questions according to a schedule that is convenient for them.

You also make the very valid point that the topics are a little broad. This is why we are currently negotiating with partners (and inviting proposals) to set up niche &#039;Yoosks&#039; based on geographical areas and news categories. So in the future, expect to see politics.yoosk, birmingham.yoosk, media.yoosk, football.yoosk etc...

As a new format for interaction between audiences and public figures, Yoosk is more of a news application than a stand alone  publication. Above all what we are looking for are partners that already have an audience in a particular niche who want to revolutionise the way they involve that audience in the news agenda.

We really look  forward to hearing from anyone who likes the idea and wants to get involved.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gabriela,<br />
Thanks for a very thoughtful review of our site. You made some very perceptive comments on what we need to improve and I&#8217;m pleased to say that we are already working on these&#8230;</p>
<p>You rightly suggest that at first getting answers (and therefore content) is going to be one of the biggest challenges we face. In fact we have set out to get a &#8216;commitment to answer&#8217; from the public figures in the Yoosk features before we post them in the &#8216;Committed Features&#8217; section, just as you suggest.</p>
<p>The next step is to systematically approach PR agents and spokepeople to get them to agree to answer questions according to a schedule that is convenient for them.</p>
<p>You also make the very valid point that the topics are a little broad. This is why we are currently negotiating with partners (and inviting proposals) to set up niche &#8216;Yoosks&#8217; based on geographical areas and news categories. So in the future, expect to see politics.yoosk, birmingham.yoosk, media.yoosk, football.yoosk etc&#8230;</p>
<p>As a new format for interaction between audiences and public figures, Yoosk is more of a news application than a stand alone  publication. Above all what we are looking for are partners that already have an audience in a particular niche who want to revolutionise the way they involve that audience in the news agenda.</p>
<p>We really look  forward to hearing from anyone who likes the idea and wants to get involved.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoosk: entrevistas colaborativas &#124; Sicrono</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/12/12/review-yoosk/comment-page-1/#comment-1519</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoosk: entrevistas colaborativas &#124; Sicrono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2007/12/12/review-yoosk/#comment-1519</guid>
		<description>[...] Me llamó la atención este sitio por la propuesta que tiene para los usuarios. Yoosk? se trata básicamente de proponer preguntas a &#8220;políticos y celebridades&#8221; para que luego la comunidad vote por ellas. Las preguntas que logren superar los 100 votos serán entregadas por el equipo de Yoosk a esas celebridades, esa es su promesa &#8220;y harán lo posible por obtener las respuestas&#8221;. A su vez las preguntas y respuestas pueden ser comentadas por los usuarios. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Me llamó la atención este sitio por la propuesta que tiene para los usuarios. Yoosk? se trata básicamente de proponer preguntas a &#8220;políticos y celebridades&#8221; para que luego la comunidad vote por ellas. Las preguntas que logren superar los 100 votos serán entregadas por el equipo de Yoosk a esas celebridades, esa es su promesa &#8220;y harán lo posible por obtener las respuestas&#8221;. A su vez las preguntas y respuestas pueden ser comentadas por los usuarios. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
