<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Chinese earthquake and Twitter &#8211; crowdsourcing without managers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/</link>
	<description>This is a conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:24:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sohbet</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/comment-page-2/#comment-220135</link>
		<dc:creator>sohbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/?p=1136#comment-220135</guid>
		<description>very good thanks you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good thanks you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting ideas about blogging &#124; Ismail Mechbal Portfolio</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/comment-page-2/#comment-219844</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting ideas about blogging &#124; Ismail Mechbal Portfolio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/?p=1136#comment-219844</guid>
		<description>[...] – and write about it. If you have access to the internet during the event you can even ‘liveblog’ it by starting a post as soon as you have something to report and adding updates or n.... Ambitious bloggers can use liveblogging tool [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] – and write about it. If you have access to the internet during the event you can even ‘liveblog’ it by starting a post as soon as you have something to report and adding updates or n&#8230;. Ambitious bloggers can use liveblogging tool [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ride on mowers</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/comment-page-2/#comment-207635</link>
		<dc:creator>Ride on mowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/?p=1136#comment-207635</guid>
		<description>The fact is that Twitter became lately a source for real time data, remember that guy that called the police by using Twitter instead of calling 911? That guy is one optimist dude. However, I don&#039;t think it will go further that this, I mean Ok with the news as long as you trust the internet as a reliable source of data, but not more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is that Twitter became lately a source for real time data, remember that guy that called the police by using Twitter instead of calling 911? That guy is one optimist dude. However, I don&#8217;t think it will go further that this, I mean Ok with the news as long as you trust the internet as a reliable source of data, but not more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Translation Services</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/comment-page-2/#comment-204980</link>
		<dc:creator>Translation Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/?p=1136#comment-204980</guid>
		<description>Although post is nice but I am not agree with all the points.  Any way best as compare to others...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although post is nice but I am not agree with all the points.  Any way best as compare to others&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: External HDD</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/comment-page-2/#comment-164588</link>
		<dc:creator>External HDD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 07:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/?p=1136#comment-164588</guid>
		<description>I think that your journal rocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that your journal rocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data Flows and Crises in Online Reputation Economies - Caseorganic</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/comment-page-2/#comment-100643</link>
		<dc:creator>Data Flows and Crises in Online Reputation Economies - Caseorganic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/?p=1136#comment-100643</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; Additional Sources:  For more information and a full analysis of the Twitter Earthquake reporting, please visit: http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; Additional Sources:  For more information and a full analysis of the Twitter Earthquake reporting, please visit: <a href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/" rel="nofollow">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dumbuk</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/comment-page-2/#comment-81841</link>
		<dc:creator>dumbuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/?p=1136#comment-81841</guid>
		<description>thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/comment-page-2/#comment-74799</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/?p=1136#comment-74799</guid>
		<description>Pity that it isnt following.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pity that it isnt following.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ride on mower</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/comment-page-2/#comment-74798</link>
		<dc:creator>ride on mower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/?p=1136#comment-74798</guid>
		<description>Here is crowdsourcing without the editorial management. How quickly otherwise would a journalist have thought of using Twitterlocal with a Google translation? And how soon before someone improves it so it only pulls tweets with the word ‘earthquake’, or more specific to the region affected? (It also emphasises the need for newspapers and broadcasters to have programmers on the team who could do this quickly) Thanks folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is crowdsourcing without the editorial management. How quickly otherwise would a journalist have thought of using Twitterlocal with a Google translation? And how soon before someone improves it so it only pulls tweets with the word ‘earthquake’, or more specific to the region affected? (It also emphasises the need for newspapers and broadcasters to have programmers on the team who could do this quickly) Thanks folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loto</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/12/twitter-and-the-chinese-earthquake/comment-page-2/#comment-57947</link>
		<dc:creator>loto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/?p=1136#comment-57947</guid>
		<description>thanks you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
