<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ‘title’ link attribute: is it worth it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/21/title-link-attribute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/21/title-link-attribute/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray Dick</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/21/title-link-attribute/#comment-5711</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/?p=1153#comment-5711</guid>
		<description>Hi Nicolas,

I&#039;m no expert on this - so I&#039;ll pose my thought as a question:

Aren&#039;t link attributes also used as a means of accessibility for the visually impaired, who use screen reading software to get through the content on a page?

If so (and I confess I don&#039;t know), then you stand both to potentially scupper your compliance, but might also be missing out on a significant online audience - up to 10% of your potential audience, according to this page:

http://www.different.com.au/publications/200409accessibility.asp

Best,

Murray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nicolas,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m no expert on this &#8211; so I&#8217;ll pose my thought as a question:</p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t link attributes also used as a means of accessibility for the visually impaired, who use screen reading software to get through the content on a page?</p>
<p>If so (and I confess I don&#8217;t know), then you stand both to potentially scupper your compliance, but might also be missing out on a significant online audience &#8211; up to 10% of your potential audience, according to this page:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.different.com.au/publications/200409accessibility.asp" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.different.com.au/publications/200409accessibility.asp?referer=');">http://www.different.com.au/publications/200409accessibility.asp</a></p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Murray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yelvington</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/05/21/title-link-attribute/#comment-5710</link>
		<dc:creator>yelvington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/?p=1153#comment-5710</guid>
		<description>Two words: Feeping creaturism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two words: Feeping creaturism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

