<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter &amp; SMS: comparison table of services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/08/22/twitter-sms-comparison-table-of-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/08/22/twitter-sms-comparison-table-of-services/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:16:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holy Moly &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitter und SMS - Alternativen</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/08/22/twitter-sms-comparison-table-of-services/#comment-6503</link>
		<dc:creator>Holy Moly &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitter und SMS - Alternativen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=1342#comment-6503</guid>
		<description>[...] ** Ersehen im Beitrag Twitter &amp; SMS: comparison table of services [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ** Ersehen im Beitrag Twitter &amp; SMS: comparison table of services [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hootSMS</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/08/22/twitter-sms-comparison-table-of-services/#comment-6502</link>
		<dc:creator>hootSMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=1342#comment-6502</guid>
		<description>The link in your article is wrong for hootSMS. Could you possibly correct it as it&#039;s a deadline market and we&#039;re all scrambling for custom. The correct URL is http://www.hootsms.com.

It&#039;s pretty much live now and bursting with splendid features.

Many thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link in your article is wrong for hootSMS. Could you possibly correct it as it&#8217;s a deadline market and we&#8217;re all scrambling for custom. The correct URL is <a href="http://www.hootsms.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.hootsms.com?referer=');">http://www.hootsms.com</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty much live now and bursting with splendid features.</p>
<p>Many thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/08/22/twitter-sms-comparison-table-of-services/#comment-6501</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=1342#comment-6501</guid>
		<description>twitsms (who I signed up with)  has gone down to £0.05.  The Irish rate has gone up from €0.05 to €0.07 though. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twitsms (who I signed up with)  has gone down to £0.05.  The Irish rate has gone up from €0.05 to €0.07 though. <img src='http://onlinejournalismblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

