<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Post more = rank higher. We knew it already, but here&#8217;s the evidence.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/09/25/post-more-rank-higher-we-knew-it-already-but-heres-the-evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/09/25/post-more-rank-higher-we-knew-it-already-but-heres-the-evidence/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:16:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Bennett</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/09/25/post-more-rank-higher-we-knew-it-already-but-heres-the-evidence/#comment-6969</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=1541#comment-6969</guid>
		<description>Interesting. While it would be difficult for any new blogger to aim straight for the top 100 successful blogs on the whole internet, hope does not appear to be lost if you want to create a successful post without posting 10 times every day.    In terms of posting rates, the box on the graph seems to be saying that: &quot;if you post once a day or more (25 times a month) then you&#039;ve a good chance of being somewhere in the top 5000 bloggers on the internet because most blogs post only once every three days or so (10 times a month).&quot;    So if you set your blogging work-flow up for just two posts a day (60 or so a month), you&#039;ll go far. Further, I imagine, if they&#039;re quality posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. While it would be difficult for any new blogger to aim straight for the top 100 successful blogs on the whole internet, hope does not appear to be lost if you want to create a successful post without posting 10 times every day.    In terms of posting rates, the box on the graph seems to be saying that: &quot;if you post once a day or more (25 times a month) then you&#039;ve a good chance of being somewhere in the top 5000 bloggers on the internet because most blogs post only once every three days or so (10 times a month).&quot;    So if you set your blogging work-flow up for just two posts a day (60 or so a month), you&#039;ll go far. Further, I imagine, if they&#039;re quality posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/09/25/post-more-rank-higher-we-knew-it-already-but-heres-the-evidence/#comment-6968</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=1541#comment-6968</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m new to the blogging world and looking for ways to improve my blog. Thanks for the information, I can use the help and enjoy the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m new to the blogging world and looking for ways to improve my blog. Thanks for the information, I can use the help and enjoy the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheWorstofPerth</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/09/25/post-more-rank-higher-we-knew-it-already-but-heres-the-evidence/#comment-6967</link>
		<dc:creator>TheWorstofPerth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=1541#comment-6967</guid>
		<description>Categories separated under different pages but  united in the comments might work better, but wordpress.com doesn&#039;t allow for such a customisation. It would still only be a slight improvement as far as diluting interest in one particular post goes, but would be better overall concept. Trying out  intense debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Categories separated under different pages but  united in the comments might work better, but wordpress.com doesn&#039;t allow for such a customisation. It would still only be a slight improvement as far as diluting interest in one particular post goes, but would be better overall concept. Trying out  intense debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/09/25/post-more-rank-higher-we-knew-it-already-but-heres-the-evidence/#comment-6966</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=1541#comment-6966</guid>
		<description>Seems to me you may have to split the site into categories to accommodate the extra content if you want to retain fewer posts per day...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me you may have to split the site into categories to accommodate the extra content if you want to retain fewer posts per day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Worst of Perth</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/09/25/post-more-rank-higher-we-knew-it-already-but-heres-the-evidence/#comment-6965</link>
		<dc:creator>The Worst of Perth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=1541#comment-6965</guid>
		<description>I find that posting twice a day never means twice the number of visitors. Posting more than twice tends to kill conversation between loyal commenters and usually doesn&#039;t develop the really interesting comment threads. On the other hand, I have a big queue of good content, much of it original material submitted by readers. They get annoyed if the submission they&#039;ve taken the trouble to send doesn&#039;t appear for months. I&#039;m not really sure how to resolve it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that posting twice a day never means twice the number of visitors. Posting more than twice tends to kill conversation between loyal commenters and usually doesn&#039;t develop the really interesting comment threads. On the other hand, I have a big queue of good content, much of it original material submitted by readers. They get annoyed if the submission they&#039;ve taken the trouble to send doesn&#039;t appear for months. I&#039;m not really sure how to resolve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

