<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are you teaching (or being taught) the News Diamond?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/10/16/are-you-teaching-or-being-taught-the-news-diamond/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/10/16/are-you-teaching-or-being-taught-the-news-diamond/</link>
	<description>This is a conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:55:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Journalism education is dated &#171; Content Ninja&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/10/16/are-you-teaching-or-being-taught-the-news-diamond/comment-page-1/#comment-53120</link>
		<dc:creator>Journalism education is dated &#171; Content Ninja&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=1664#comment-53120</guid>
		<description>[...] Are you teaching (or being taught) the News Diamond? (onlinejournalismblog.com)    &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are you teaching (or being taught) the News Diamond? (onlinejournalismblog.com)    &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/10/16/are-you-teaching-or-being-taught-the-news-diamond/comment-page-1/#comment-24932</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=1664#comment-24932</guid>
		<description>If you read the original post that explains how it works, the top half is all about garnering input and interactivity - so the alert asks for anyone with expertise/info; the draft does the same; and the package incorporates contributions made at both stages. The analysis stage might be written by someone who posted a comment to the blog (draft).    But you&#039;re right - the diagram doesn&#039;t capture that, and there should be some reflection of the loops within it. Thanks for your insights.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you read the original post that explains how it works, the top half is all about garnering input and interactivity &#8211; so the alert asks for anyone with expertise/info; the draft does the same; and the package incorporates contributions made at both stages. The analysis stage might be written by someone who posted a comment to the blog (draft).    But you&#039;re right &#8211; the diagram doesn&#039;t capture that, and there should be some reflection of the loops within it. Thanks for your insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/10/16/are-you-teaching-or-being-taught-the-news-diamond/comment-page-1/#comment-24931</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=1664#comment-24931</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve not seen this before. Interesting. The top half lacks interactivity in the development of coverage. It accounts for the various waves of content that a media operation would push out, but doesn&#039;t capture the fact that each new wave will (or should) reflect on (or incorporate) audience reaction to what was sent in the earlier waves. Needs a feedback loop.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve not seen this before. Interesting. The top half lacks interactivity in the development of coverage. It accounts for the various waves of content that a media operation would push out, but doesn&#039;t capture the fact that each new wave will (or should) reflect on (or incorporate) audience reaction to what was sent in the earlier waves. Needs a feedback loop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
