<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC tackle social video. Sort of.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/11/06/the-bbc-on-seesmic-qik-12seconds-and-phreadz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/11/06/the-bbc-on-seesmic-qik-12seconds-and-phreadz/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaitlin</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/11/06/the-bbc-on-seesmic-qik-12seconds-and-phreadz/#comment-7816</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=1810#comment-7816</guid>
		<description>lol... i love the analogy to 1950s news clips!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol&#8230; i love the analogy to 1950s news clips!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Foy</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/11/06/the-bbc-on-seesmic-qik-12seconds-and-phreadz/#comment-7815</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Foy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=1810#comment-7815</guid>
		<description>Paul, I enjoyed the opportunity to contribute to the ongoing conversation about the medium on your Seesmic thread. I use Seesmic pretty much exclusively for video posts, though  Phreadz has it at the moment in terms of flexibility ... channeling of conversations. 12Secs doesn&#039;t suit my posting style. Seesmic has been promising &#039;rooms&#039; for a while to enable focus in conversation. Whilst it can be irritating sometimes, I quite like the way threads can ramble and even &#039;hijack&#039; a topic.    We&#039;re still exploring how the medium can be used ... it&#039;s a tool and shouldn&#039;t define us.  The various communities will, in time, shape it to their various needs.    PS Like you, I use Seesmic (as well as the slew of social networks I&#039;m on) as pre-blogpost tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I enjoyed the opportunity to contribute to the ongoing conversation about the medium on your Seesmic thread. I use Seesmic pretty much exclusively for video posts, though  Phreadz has it at the moment in terms of flexibility &#8230; channeling of conversations. 12Secs doesn&#039;t suit my posting style. Seesmic has been promising &#039;rooms&#039; for a while to enable focus in conversation. Whilst it can be irritating sometimes, I quite like the way threads can ramble and even &#039;hijack&#039; a topic.    We&#039;re still exploring how the medium can be used &#8230; it&#039;s a tool and shouldn&#039;t define us.  The various communities will, in time, shape it to their various needs.    PS Like you, I use Seesmic (as well as the slew of social networks I&#039;m on) as pre-blogpost tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CharlieO</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/11/06/the-bbc-on-seesmic-qik-12seconds-and-phreadz/#comment-7814</link>
		<dc:creator>CharlieO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=1810#comment-7814</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with you about the rough material on Qik working best - as is alluded to in your Seesmic thread, when broadcast organisations remove the artificial constructs of studio and auto-q they start to regain the sincerity that for many they have lost, and their expert opinions and unique insights shine through as they should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you about the rough material on Qik working best &#8211; as is alluded to in your Seesmic thread, when broadcast organisations remove the artificial constructs of studio and auto-q they start to regain the sincerity that for many they have lost, and their expert opinions and unique insights shine through as they should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

