<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV station forces blogger to withdraw criticism of its coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/02/tv-station-sues-blogger-for-criticising-its-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/02/tv-station-sues-blogger-for-criticising-its-coverage/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UberT-Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Whats in a name?</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/02/tv-station-sues-blogger-for-criticising-its-coverage/#comment-8526</link>
		<dc:creator>UberT-Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Whats in a name?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 05:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2068#comment-8526</guid>
		<description>[...] lest the media or some Tom, Dick or Harry does sues me and forces me to apologize, like the NDTV case [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lest the media or some Tom, Dick or Harry does sues me and forces me to apologize, like the NDTV case [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: izdelava strani</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/02/tv-station-sues-blogger-for-criticising-its-coverage/#comment-8525</link>
		<dc:creator>izdelava strani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2068#comment-8525</guid>
		<description>Thought the internet and blogosfera was immune to the politics, guess i was wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought the internet and blogosfera was immune to the politics, guess i was wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ::: Think Macro ::: » Reading Blogs #11</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/02/tv-station-sues-blogger-for-criticising-its-coverage/#comment-8524</link>
		<dc:creator>::: Think Macro ::: » Reading Blogs #11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2068#comment-8524</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;TV station sues blogger for criticising its coverage&#8221; - A really interesting case that somewhat reminded me the Digg controversy about a year and a half ago; in a nutshell: an Indian blogger criticized the coverage of one of the Indian station of the Mombay attack, got sued by the TV station, removed the post and published an apology, the Indian blogosphere reacted.  Read more about it here. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;TV station sues blogger for criticising its coverage&#8221; &#8211; A really interesting case that somewhat reminded me the Digg controversy about a year and a half ago; in a nutshell: an Indian blogger criticized the coverage of one of the Indian station of the Mombay attack, got sued by the TV station, removed the post and published an apology, the Indian blogosphere reacted.  Read more about it here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peeyoosh Chandra</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/02/tv-station-sues-blogger-for-criticising-its-coverage/#comment-8523</link>
		<dc:creator>Peeyoosh Chandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2068#comment-8523</guid>
		<description>Wow ... how to take the bull by the horns. Not what I would have done given the outrage already expressed by the blogging community.

I think that journalist and news media need to come up with a code of conduct for real-time broadcasting - esp. in tense situations where unreliable information is coming through.

Sort of like an acceptable error rate in the news signal.

BTW Nick, your comment above made me laugh - was thinking the exact same thing as I read this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8230; how to take the bull by the horns. Not what I would have done given the outrage already expressed by the blogging community.</p>
<p>I think that journalist and news media need to come up with a code of conduct for real-time broadcasting &#8211; esp. in tense situations where unreliable information is coming through.</p>
<p>Sort of like an acceptable error rate in the news signal.</p>
<p>BTW Nick, your comment above made me laugh &#8211; was thinking the exact same thing as I read this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumit</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/02/tv-station-sues-blogger-for-criticising-its-coverage/#comment-8522</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2068#comment-8522</guid>
		<description>Agreed, that there may have been lapses on the part of the journalist, even Barkha.

But, the BIG question is, is the army or the police or the NSG not aware of the consequences of the information being broadcast, the proximity they give to the journalists and general public from the scene or war, crime or catastrophe, and do they not have sufficient rights or powers to stop sensitive broadcasts being made while the battle or whatever I mentioned above is still on?

Media will try it’s best to cover stories. They may not even be aware of the harm they might be doing in the process, as has been indicated in the blogs and comments, but are the people who are actually involved in solving the problem dumb, or do they not follow any protocol?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, that there may have been lapses on the part of the journalist, even Barkha.</p>
<p>But, the BIG question is, is the army or the police or the NSG not aware of the consequences of the information being broadcast, the proximity they give to the journalists and general public from the scene or war, crime or catastrophe, and do they not have sufficient rights or powers to stop sensitive broadcasts being made while the battle or whatever I mentioned above is still on?</p>
<p>Media will try it’s best to cover stories. They may not even be aware of the harm they might be doing in the process, as has been indicated in the blogs and comments, but are the people who are actually involved in solving the problem dumb, or do they not follow any protocol?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NDTV: &#8216;Your viewers are your distributors now&#8217; at Blogbharti</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/02/tv-station-sues-blogger-for-criticising-its-coverage/#comment-8521</link>
		<dc:creator>NDTV: &#8216;Your viewers are your distributors now&#8217; at Blogbharti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2068#comment-8521</guid>
		<description>[...] Paul Bradshaw of the Online Journalism Blog puts it succinctly: Lesson to news organisations: your viewers are your distributors now. Suing them is not good management. Nor is it good for freedom of speech - something you might find useful yourselves in the future. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paul Bradshaw of the Online Journalism Blog puts it succinctly: Lesson to news organisations: your viewers are your distributors now. Suing them is not good management. Nor is it good for freedom of speech &#8211; something you might find useful yourselves in the future. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bored Ninja</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/02/tv-station-sues-blogger-for-criticising-its-coverage/#comment-8520</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bored Ninja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2068#comment-8520</guid>
		<description>Hmm something seemed a little forced here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm something seemed a little forced here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Censorship in the age of the blog. &#187; Simple and Loveable</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/02/tv-station-sues-blogger-for-criticising-its-coverage/#comment-8519</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Censorship in the age of the blog. &#187; Simple and Loveable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2068#comment-8519</guid>
		<description>[...] One blogger has been sued for claiming a TV station used &#8217;shoddy journalism&#8217; and has unpublished his post and issues a retraction statement. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One blogger has been sued for claiming a TV station used &#8217;shoddy journalism&#8217; and has unpublished his post and issues a retraction statement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Booth</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/02/tv-station-sues-blogger-for-criticising-its-coverage/#comment-8518</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2068#comment-8518</guid>
		<description>Someone should have a quiet word with them about the music industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone should have a quiet word with them about the music industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

