<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Times Online tops newspaper Stumble list</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/19/times-online-tops-newspaper-stumble-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/19/times-online-tops-newspaper-stumble-list/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newspaper sites: do not link to us &#124; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/19/times-online-tops-newspaper-stumble-list/#comment-9129</link>
		<dc:creator>Newspaper sites: do not link to us &#124; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2158#comment-9129</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s fairly standard for any publication to forbid people from copying its material. But some papers have gone so far with their site T&amp;Cs that you&#8217;re not allowed to link to - or even read - their websites. The quotes below are all from the sites&#8217; T&amp;Cs (and all seem to conflict with their &#8217;share&#8217; buttons, such as the one enabling the Times to top the StumbleUpon league). [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s fairly standard for any publication to forbid people from copying its material. But some papers have gone so far with their site T&amp;Cs that you&#8217;re not allowed to link to &#8211; or even read &#8211; their websites. The quotes below are all from the sites&#8217; T&amp;Cs (and all seem to conflict with their &#8217;share&#8217; buttons, such as the one enabling the Times to top the StumbleUpon league). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guardian tops Reddit submissions list &#124; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/19/times-online-tops-newspaper-stumble-list/#comment-9128</link>
		<dc:creator>Guardian tops Reddit submissions list &#124; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2158#comment-9128</guid>
		<description>[...] The news follows the Telegraph topping the Digg list and the Times topping the StumbleUpon list. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The news follows the Telegraph topping the Digg list and the Times topping the StumbleUpon list. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telegraph.co.uk top of Digg league &#124; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/02/19/times-online-tops-newspaper-stumble-list/#comment-9127</link>
		<dc:creator>Telegraph.co.uk top of Digg league &#124; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2158#comment-9127</guid>
		<description>[...] Times Online may be winning at StumbleUpon, but the Telegraph has: [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Times Online may be winning at StumbleUpon, but the Telegraph has: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

