<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8% of Telegraph.co.uk traffic from social sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/05/11/8-of-telegraphcouk-traffic-from-social-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/05/11/8-of-telegraphcouk-traffic-from-social-sites/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 25 reasons you shouldn&#8217;t be blogging</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/05/11/8-of-telegraphcouk-traffic-from-social-sites/#comment-44523</link>
		<dc:creator>25 reasons you shouldn&#8217;t be blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2678#comment-44523</guid>
		<description>[...] do well. It’s hard to get noticed and it’s hard to carry on creating good content. I&#8217;ve written loads of first blog posts in my time (as have others I&#8217;ve known) &#8211; the motivation to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do well. It’s hard to get noticed and it’s hard to carry on creating good content. I&#8217;ve written loads of first blog posts in my time (as have others I&#8217;ve known) &#8211; the motivation to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley L.</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/05/11/8-of-telegraphcouk-traffic-from-social-sites/#comment-9910</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 09:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2678#comment-9910</guid>
		<description>This is good and i&#039;m not entirely surprised seen as the Telegraph is very popular any way, but i had no idea how many people actully read it or at least went on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good and i&#8217;m not entirely surprised seen as the Telegraph is very popular any way, but i had no idea how many people actully read it or at least went on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malcolm coles</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/05/11/8-of-telegraphcouk-traffic-from-social-sites/#comment-9909</link>
		<dc:creator>malcolm coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2678#comment-9909</guid>
		<description>He gave me the figure a month or so ago so it predated the expenses stuff ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He gave me the figure a month or so ago so it predated the expenses stuff &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Waddington</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/05/11/8-of-telegraphcouk-traffic-from-social-sites/#comment-9908</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Waddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2678#comment-9908</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also the matter of the expenses story that it has been touting this week, garnering links from across the media and presumably promoting its search authority. Great content will always attract eyeballs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also the matter of the expenses story that it has been touting this week, garnering links from across the media and presumably promoting its search authority. Great content will always attract eyeballs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

