<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MPs expenses data: now it&#8217;s The Telegraph&#8217;s turn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/06/23/mps-expenses-data-now-its-the-telegraphs-turn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/06/23/mps-expenses-data-now-its-the-telegraphs-turn/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: St Petersburg Times: cautiously embracing the web, assiduously reporting Scientology &#124; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/06/23/mps-expenses-data-now-its-the-telegraphs-turn/#comment-10294</link>
		<dc:creator>St Petersburg Times: cautiously embracing the web, assiduously reporting Scientology &#124; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2880#comment-10294</guid>
		<description>[...] in as unredacted form as possible so that readers may form their own judgements (such as the Telegraph and the Guardian in the UK have done with MPs’ [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in as unredacted form as possible so that readers may form their own judgements (such as the Telegraph and the Guardian in the UK have done with MPs’ [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Booker</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/06/23/mps-expenses-data-now-its-the-telegraphs-turn/#comment-10293</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Booker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2880#comment-10293</guid>
		<description>I was particularly interested to note that Arundel and South Downs was the most-searched constituency today (June 23).
Could this be because MP Nick Herbert has criticised the Telegraph for picking on him due to his sexuality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was particularly interested to note that Arundel and South Downs was the most-searched constituency today (June 23).<br />
Could this be because MP Nick Herbert has criticised the Telegraph for picking on him due to his sexuality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

