<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chris Anderson’s ‘Free’: Not worth buying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/10/chris-anderson%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98free%e2%80%99-not-worth-the-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/10/chris-anderson%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98free%e2%80%99-not-worth-the-money/</link>
	<description>This is a conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:03:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Interesting journalism sites you&#8217;ve probably never heard of &#124; Bill Bennett</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/10/chris-anderson%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98free%e2%80%99-not-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-161993</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting journalism sites you&#8217;ve probably never heard of &#124; Bill Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3015#comment-161993</guid>
		<description>[...] Recommended recent taster: Chris Anderson&#8217;s &#8216;Free&#8217;: Not worth buying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recommended recent taster: Chris Anderson&#8217;s &#8216;Free&#8217;: Not worth buying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/10/chris-anderson%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98free%e2%80%99-not-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-134721</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3015#comment-134721</guid>
		<description>I agree with everything said here - while he&#039;s not saying anything new to those of us who follow this, he is writing a populist book about new business models, not an academic one. Benkler&#039;s book is incredible, and much better - but Anderson&#039;s is more accessible and clear if that&#039;s what you&#039;re after. Horses for courses - I&#039;d probably end up giving students both chapters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everything said here &#8211; while he&#8217;s not saying anything new to those of us who follow this, he is writing a populist book about new business models, not an academic one. Benkler&#8217;s book is incredible, and much better &#8211; but Anderson&#8217;s is more accessible and clear if that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re after. Horses for courses &#8211; I&#8217;d probably end up giving students both chapters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Goffin</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/10/chris-anderson%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98free%e2%80%99-not-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-134658</link>
		<dc:creator>James Goffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3015#comment-134658</guid>
		<description>I found it exasperating too.
There is nothing new there, and the historical detail used to pad out the very thin argument simplify serves to show that far from being some wonderful new economic model it&#039;s just the same old approach again - give something for free in the hope that people will buy something else that covers the cost of both.
He also largely ignores the fact that although the marginal cost of distribution may be so low as to be insignificant, that doesn&#039;t reduce the original cost of development and production - even for digital items.
The addendum that points out - and this may be a cruel paraphrase - that since the recession none of that free stuff stands up any more - is, er, priceless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found it exasperating too.<br />
There is nothing new there, and the historical detail used to pad out the very thin argument simplify serves to show that far from being some wonderful new economic model it&#8217;s just the same old approach again &#8211; give something for free in the hope that people will buy something else that covers the cost of both.<br />
He also largely ignores the fact that although the marginal cost of distribution may be so low as to be insignificant, that doesn&#8217;t reduce the original cost of development and production &#8211; even for digital items.<br />
The addendum that points out &#8211; and this may be a cruel paraphrase &#8211; that since the recession none of that free stuff stands up any more &#8211; is, er, priceless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting journalism sites you&#8217;ve probably never heard of &#171; Knowledge Workers</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/10/chris-anderson%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98free%e2%80%99-not-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-133907</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting journalism sites you&#8217;ve probably never heard of &#171; Knowledge Workers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3015#comment-133907</guid>
		<description>[...] Recommended recent taster: Chris Anderson&#8217;s &#8216;Free&#8217;: Not worth buying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recommended recent taster: Chris Anderson&#8217;s &#8216;Free&#8217;: Not worth buying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7 Public Speaking Survival Tips - efeedyourmind</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/10/chris-anderson%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98free%e2%80%99-not-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-131954</link>
		<dc:creator>7 Public Speaking Survival Tips - efeedyourmind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3015#comment-131954</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Anderson&#8217;s &#8216;Free&#8217;: Not worth buying (onlinejournalismblog.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Anderson&#8217;s &#8216;Free&#8217;: Not worth buying (onlinejournalismblog.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan Fox</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/10/chris-anderson%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98free%e2%80%99-not-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-129567</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3015#comment-129567</guid>
		<description>Chris Anderson isn&#039;t an academic and doesn&#039;t write like one. The funny thing is that I actually think Chris is in the mold of Malcolm Gladwell, a writer who cherry picks facts and stories to suit his general thesis but in general overlooks nuance in favor of developing a master theory... Having said that there is a role of people like Chris Anderson and books like &#039;Free&#039;. 

They provide an overview on a topic, which is great for people new to the topic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Anderson isn&#8217;t an academic and doesn&#8217;t write like one. The funny thing is that I actually think Chris is in the mold of Malcolm Gladwell, a writer who cherry picks facts and stories to suit his general thesis but in general overlooks nuance in favor of developing a master theory&#8230; Having said that there is a role of people like Chris Anderson and books like &#8216;Free&#8217;. </p>
<p>They provide an overview on a topic, which is great for people new to the topic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: De graça mesmo?</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/10/chris-anderson%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98free%e2%80%99-not-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-128298</link>
		<dc:creator>De graça mesmo?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3015#comment-128298</guid>
		<description>[...] De um lado, vem repercutindo bastante o novo livro do editor da Wired, Chris Anderson: &#8220;Free&#8221;, que fala sobre a tendência da gratuidade da informação e outros bens (Chris Anderson&#8217;s Free: Not Worth Buying). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] De um lado, vem repercutindo bastante o novo livro do editor da Wired, Chris Anderson: &#8220;Free&#8221;, que fala sobre a tendência da gratuidade da informação e outros bens (Chris Anderson&#8217;s Free: Not Worth Buying). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindy McAdams</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/10/chris-anderson%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98free%e2%80%99-not-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-126652</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy McAdams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3015#comment-126652</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading Clay Shirky&#039;s &quot;Here Comes Everybody&quot; this month, and I must say, Anderson&#039;s book sounds like too little, too late. We&#039;ve already had Benkler&#039;s &quot;Wealth of Networks&quot; (2006), numerous books by Lessig, Jenkins&#039;s brilliant and highly readable &quot;Convergence Culture,&quot; and Shirky&#039;s remarkably straightforward &quot;Everybody&quot; (2008). I can&#039;t see any evidence in the promotional copy or in the reviews that Anderson has anything new to add.

As for his claim that he could find &quot;[n]o theories of gratis, or pricing models that went to zero&quot; -- I guess he hasn&#039;t read Benkler, Jenkins or Shirky. In that case, how can we consider him any kind of an authority on his topics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading Clay Shirky&#8217;s &#8220;Here Comes Everybody&#8221; this month, and I must say, Anderson&#8217;s book sounds like too little, too late. We&#8217;ve already had Benkler&#8217;s &#8220;Wealth of Networks&#8221; (2006), numerous books by Lessig, Jenkins&#8217;s brilliant and highly readable &#8220;Convergence Culture,&#8221; and Shirky&#8217;s remarkably straightforward &#8220;Everybody&#8221; (2008). I can&#8217;t see any evidence in the promotional copy or in the reviews that Anderson has anything new to add.</p>
<p>As for his claim that he could find &#8220;[n]o theories of gratis, or pricing models that went to zero&#8221; &#8212; I guess he hasn&#8217;t read Benkler, Jenkins or Shirky. In that case, how can we consider him any kind of an authority on his topics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
