<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How US traffic is vital for UK newspaper sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/30/us-traffic-uk-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/30/us-traffic-uk-newspapers/</link>
	<description>This is a conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Antikeylogger      anti keylogger</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/30/us-traffic-uk-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-201413</link>
		<dc:creator>Antikeylogger      anti keylogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3121#comment-201413</guid>
		<description>I am glad to post my views and points in this blog, but I must say that webmaster of this blog has done a very great job to make his blog more informative and more discussable but unfortunately everything is same here that more than 80% in this and other blogs post their comments for making spam!!!, so i will really all this spam links to google band tool, because webmaster makes blogs for making discuss and for sloving each other problems.
thanks


Good, site have learned more through this site than I have through months of reading search engine optimisation and reading how to gain links books. Prehaps you can give me me some advice on how to get my wiltshire based web company to the top of search engines - help to get me comments/links and to my site?



Excellent site, keep up the good work. I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I’m glad I found your blog. Thanks, 
A definite great read…


&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spyshelter.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Antikeylogger&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spyshelter.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;anti keylogger&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad to post my views and points in this blog, but I must say that webmaster of this blog has done a very great job to make his blog more informative and more discussable but unfortunately everything is same here that more than 80% in this and other blogs post their comments for making spam!!!, so i will really all this spam links to google band tool, because webmaster makes blogs for making discuss and for sloving each other problems.<br />
thanks</p>
<p>Good, site have learned more through this site than I have through months of reading search engine optimisation and reading how to gain links books. Prehaps you can give me me some advice on how to get my wiltshire based web company to the top of search engines &#8211; help to get me comments/links and to my site?</p>
<p>Excellent site, keep up the good work. I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I’m glad I found your blog. Thanks,<br />
A definite great read…</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spyshelter.com" rel="nofollow">Antikeylogger</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.spyshelter.com" rel="nofollow">anti keylogger</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/30/us-traffic-uk-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-166216</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3121#comment-166216</guid>
		<description>Malc - 

Don&#039;t admit that in public, you will get spammed more :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malc &#8211; </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t admit that in public, you will get spammed more <img src='http://onlinejournalismblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malcolmcoles</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/30/us-traffic-uk-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-166210</link>
		<dc:creator>malcolmcoles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3121#comment-166210</guid>
		<description>Jon - the nofollow gets lifted after a couple of days ;)

On the ads thing, there&#039;s some calculations &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/telegraph-trafficsocial-sites/#comment-2553&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; about what some of these visitors are worth (reply from me further down).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon &#8211; the nofollow gets lifted after a couple of days <img src='http://onlinejournalismblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>On the ads thing, there&#8217;s some calculations <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/telegraph-trafficsocial-sites/#comment-2553">here</a> about what some of these visitors are worth (reply from me further down).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/30/us-traffic-uk-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-166208</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3121#comment-166208</guid>
		<description>Well your &#039;no follow&#039; on out going links should sort that issue out, but usually even if I am link building on do follow blogs, I want to leave a quality post that adds something to debate, also means the comment and the link stays there.

Anyway on the main point of the article it is interesting how are right wing press does much better in the states than our left wing press.

It also does affect the commercials on advertsing revenue a paper can generate. 

A Uk visitor to a Uk paper is worth much more thna an american visitor to a Uk paper, so 62 % of the mails potentail advertsing reveneue is low value.

Or you could spin it on its head and say the mail returns 5,000,000 extra visitors it can generate some reveneue on, which they would not otherwise have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well your &#8216;no follow&#8217; on out going links should sort that issue out, but usually even if I am link building on do follow blogs, I want to leave a quality post that adds something to debate, also means the comment and the link stays there.</p>
<p>Anyway on the main point of the article it is interesting how are right wing press does much better in the states than our left wing press.</p>
<p>It also does affect the commercials on advertsing revenue a paper can generate. </p>
<p>A Uk visitor to a Uk paper is worth much more thna an american visitor to a Uk paper, so 62 % of the mails potentail advertsing reveneue is low value.</p>
<p>Or you could spin it on its head and say the mail returns 5,000,000 extra visitors it can generate some reveneue on, which they would not otherwise have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malcolmcoles</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/30/us-traffic-uk-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-166206</link>
		<dc:creator>malcolmcoles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3121#comment-166206</guid>
		<description>Jon - no worries ;) It&#039;s just this site gets a lot of people leaving comments just for the link, some of whom take the effort to write a little more than &#039;nice post&#039;, so it&#039;s hard to know who to take seriously sometimes ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon &#8211; no worries <img src='http://onlinejournalismblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  It&#8217;s just this site gets a lot of people leaving comments just for the link, some of whom take the effort to write a little more than &#8216;nice post&#8217;, so it&#8217;s hard to know who to take seriously sometimes &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/30/us-traffic-uk-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-166203</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3121#comment-166203</guid>
		<description>Malcolm,

Sorry it is somethign I have preset on forums for a little bit of SEO link buuilding on a side project.

What does it hurt Jon or Richard Sharpe you dont really know me anyway?

But the info is good, its stuff I researched when I did some SEO consultancy in the journalism area 2 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malcolm,</p>
<p>Sorry it is somethign I have preset on forums for a little bit of SEO link buuilding on a side project.</p>
<p>What does it hurt Jon or Richard Sharpe you dont really know me anyway?</p>
<p>But the info is good, its stuff I researched when I did some SEO consultancy in the journalism area 2 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malcolmcoles</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/30/us-traffic-uk-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-166196</link>
		<dc:creator>malcolmcoles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3121#comment-166196</guid>
		<description>&quot;Richard&quot; - it would be easier to take your comments seriously if you weren&#039;t obviously pretending your name is richard sharpe to link to your richard-sharpe-books website on a dofollow blog. I see your name is Jon from your email address. How about using that instead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Richard&#8221; &#8211; it would be easier to take your comments seriously if you weren&#8217;t obviously pretending your name is richard sharpe to link to your richard-sharpe-books website on a dofollow blog. I see your name is Jon from your email address. How about using that instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Sharpe</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/30/us-traffic-uk-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-166166</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Sharpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3121#comment-166166</guid>
		<description>A lot of sites suffer from this issue but at about 20%, which creates signiifcant difficulties from monitarising the advertising reveneue for that percnetage.

The daily mail has suxch a high figuer because

One there subject is matter is one what americans are searching for ( more royal family, american celeb news/trvia etc, less UK sport)

but more importantly what american comentators like to link to, the daily mail does very well in the google.com rankings because its well linked to from the likes of drudge, that both sends traffic and boosts it in th US google rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of sites suffer from this issue but at about 20%, which creates signiifcant difficulties from monitarising the advertising reveneue for that percnetage.</p>
<p>The daily mail has suxch a high figuer because</p>
<p>One there subject is matter is one what americans are searching for ( more royal family, american celeb news/trvia etc, less UK sport)</p>
<p>but more importantly what american comentators like to link to, the daily mail does very well in the google.com rankings because its well linked to from the likes of drudge, that both sends traffic and boosts it in th US google rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-08-03 &#124; Joanna Geary</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/30/us-traffic-uk-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-140122</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-08-03 &#124; Joanna Geary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3121#comment-140122</guid>
		<description>[...] How US traffic is vital for UK newspaper sites &quot;On average, US traffic is 36.8% of the UK traffic (ie there is just over one US visitor for every 3 UK visitors). The figure for the Telegraph is slightly higher (44.5%) and for the Mail it’s a massive 62.5%&quot; (tags: newspapers websites) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How US traffic is vital for UK newspaper sites &quot;On average, US traffic is 36.8% of the UK traffic (ie there is just over one US visitor for every 3 UK visitors). The figure for the Telegraph is slightly higher (44.5%) and for the Mail it’s a massive 62.5%&quot; (tags: newspapers websites) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reading blogs #17 : ::: Think Macro :::</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/30/us-traffic-uk-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-139622</link>
		<dc:creator>Reading blogs #17 : ::: Think Macro :::</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3121#comment-139622</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;How US traffic is vital for UK newspaper sites&#8221; &#8211; Some June numbers about the proportion of US readers of UK online newspapers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;How US traffic is vital for UK newspaper sites&#8221; &#8211; Some June numbers about the proportion of US readers of UK online newspapers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
