<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is poor SEO behind thelondonpaper&#8217;s failure?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/08/24/poor-seo-thelondonpaper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/08/24/poor-seo-thelondonpaper/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journalists: Learn SEO or Get Killed by Patch.comMeakin Armstrong &#124; Meakin Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/08/24/poor-seo-thelondonpaper/#comment-11219</link>
		<dc:creator>Journalists: Learn SEO or Get Killed by Patch.comMeakin Armstrong &#124; Meakin Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3309#comment-11219</guid>
		<description>[...] across this posting: poor SEO may be what killed thelondonpaper.com   This entry was posted in Blog. Bookmark the [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] across this posting: poor SEO may be what killed thelondonpaper.com   This entry was posted in Blog. Bookmark the [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonali sen</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/08/24/poor-seo-thelondonpaper/#comment-11218</link>
		<dc:creator>sonali sen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3309#comment-11218</guid>
		<description>Hi,I’m taking some time to write you a comment.
I hope you don’t mind I’ve bookmarked your page,
your page is genuinely usefull for me.
its really good and informative site. thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,I’m taking some time to write you a comment.<br />
I hope you don’t mind I’ve bookmarked your page,<br />
your page is genuinely usefull for me.<br />
its really good and informative site. thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firstconversion</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/08/24/poor-seo-thelondonpaper/#comment-11217</link>
		<dc:creator>firstconversion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3309#comment-11217</guid>
		<description>As a londoner and an SEO, I can confirm it died under the weight of shit reporting. Now if it would only take the other rags with it.

It slowly got worse and worse over the years, recycled content on top of yesterdays news</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a londoner and an SEO, I can confirm it died under the weight of shit reporting. Now if it would only take the other rags with it.</p>
<p>It slowly got worse and worse over the years, recycled content on top of yesterdays news</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/08/24/poor-seo-thelondonpaper/#comment-11216</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3309#comment-11216</guid>
		<description>cool site...javascript rule!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool site&#8230;javascript rule!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malcolm coles</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/08/24/poor-seo-thelondonpaper/#comment-11215</link>
		<dc:creator>malcolm coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3309#comment-11215</guid>
		<description>Which leaves Inka Technology....

Let me get this straight. You are leaving a comment on a dofollow blog using the keywords &#039;SEO company&#039; to link to your lame website (if you&#039;re going to claim to offer highly-skilled writers, maybe learn how to use an apostrophe? If you&#039;d like me to make another 100 or so recommendations to improve your SEO, grammar and usability, do let me know ...) - and you&#039;re calling ME out for not keeping up with the times?

As I said above, meta descriptions don&#039;t help your rankings, but they do affect click-through rates. This holds as true today as it ever has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which leaves Inka Technology&#8230;.</p>
<p>Let me get this straight. You are leaving a comment on a dofollow blog using the keywords &#8216;SEO company&#8217; to link to your lame website (if you&#8217;re going to claim to offer highly-skilled writers, maybe learn how to use an apostrophe? If you&#8217;d like me to make another 100 or so recommendations to improve your SEO, grammar and usability, do let me know &#8230;) &#8211; and you&#8217;re calling ME out for not keeping up with the times?</p>
<p>As I said above, meta descriptions don&#8217;t help your rankings, but they do affect click-through rates. This holds as true today as it ever has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malcolm coles</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/08/24/poor-seo-thelondonpaper/#comment-11214</link>
		<dc:creator>malcolm coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3309#comment-11214</guid>
		<description>Everyone: Sorry for not replying, but I was on holiday. And sorry for the headline, which was completely overblown compared to what I&#039;d actually written...

So Chris, no I&#039;m not suggesting that. It might have helped though ...

Dave, while that may be true for a search on thelondonpaper itself, it&#039;s not true of all pages. So for a search on tottenham hotspur, the description google shows is:
&quot;gallery: all; Tottenham Hotspur; your pics. The ladies look out over the Firth of Forth to promote their &#039;Warren &amp; Hanbury ...&quot;.
There are many other similar examples.

If you&#039;re trying to get people to click on one of your results rather than someone else&#039;s, you&#039;ve either got to rely on your brand or the text snippet. Not setting the meta description reduces the probability of someone clicking your result.

Joanna, yes, the headline was a bit unfair (or maybe just stupid on my part) as you say. I wouldn&#039;t say the meta description issue was the developers&#039; fault though. I presume they were developing to meet some sort of business requirements ... Or maybe they vetoed the idea of using them in which case it was ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone: Sorry for not replying, but I was on holiday. And sorry for the headline, which was completely overblown compared to what I&#8217;d actually written&#8230;</p>
<p>So Chris, no I&#8217;m not suggesting that. It might have helped though &#8230;</p>
<p>Dave, while that may be true for a search on thelondonpaper itself, it&#8217;s not true of all pages. So for a search on tottenham hotspur, the description google shows is:<br />
&#8220;gallery: all; Tottenham Hotspur; your pics. The ladies look out over the Firth of Forth to promote their &#8216;Warren &amp; Hanbury &#8230;&#8221;.<br />
There are many other similar examples.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re trying to get people to click on one of your results rather than someone else&#8217;s, you&#8217;ve either got to rely on your brand or the text snippet. Not setting the meta description reduces the probability of someone clicking your result.</p>
<p>Joanna, yes, the headline was a bit unfair (or maybe just stupid on my part) as you say. I wouldn&#8217;t say the meta description issue was the developers&#8217; fault though. I presume they were developing to meet some sort of business requirements &#8230; Or maybe they vetoed the idea of using them in which case it was &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Company</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/08/24/poor-seo-thelondonpaper/#comment-11213</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3309#comment-11213</guid>
		<description>just setting meta meta descriptions are not going to help at all, it is an old technique. it used to help but now it is history. those SEOs rely on meta descriptions who are not expert in SEO field or knowing nothing what field is all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just setting meta meta descriptions are not going to help at all, it is an old technique. it used to help but now it is history. those SEOs rely on meta descriptions who are not expert in SEO field or knowing nothing what field is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulbradshaw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/08/24/poor-seo-thelondonpaper/#comment-11212</link>
		<dc:creator>paulbradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3309#comment-11212</guid>
		<description>A very good point, Dave - thanks for pointing that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good point, Dave &#8211; thanks for pointing that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riverScrap.com</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/08/24/poor-seo-thelondonpaper/#comment-11211</link>
		<dc:creator>riverScrap.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3309#comment-11211</guid>
		<description>Crappy SEO was just one symptom of their entirely broken and redundant media offering. Guess I&#039;ll have to find my Peaches Geldof news elsewhere. Oh well.

http://www.thelondonpaper.com/people/peaches-geldof</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crappy SEO was just one symptom of their entirely broken and redundant media offering. Guess I&#8217;ll have to find my Peaches Geldof news elsewhere. Oh well.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thelondonpaper.com/people/peaches-geldof" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.thelondonpaper.com/people/peaches-geldof?referer=');">http://www.thelondonpaper.com/people/peaches-geldof</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanna Geary</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/08/24/poor-seo-thelondonpaper/#comment-11210</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanna Geary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3309#comment-11210</guid>
		<description>&quot;Is poor SEO behind thelondonpaper’s failure?&quot;

Errr. I think we can safely say the answer to that is &quot;no&quot;.

I wouldn&#039;t have commented, but I do feel a need to speak up for the innovative and hard-working web team at thelondonpaper.

They relaunched the website in April as the first UK newspaper website to use the Drupal content management system.

Whilst SEO is, of course, very valuable, suggesting the quality of their website&#039;s meta descriptions was responsible for the closure of the entire operation is rather unfair!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is poor SEO behind thelondonpaper’s failure?&#8221;</p>
<p>Errr. I think we can safely say the answer to that is &#8220;no&#8221;.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t have commented, but I do feel a need to speak up for the innovative and hard-working web team at thelondonpaper.</p>
<p>They relaunched the website in April as the first UK newspaper website to use the Drupal content management system.</p>
<p>Whilst SEO is, of course, very valuable, suggesting the quality of their website&#8217;s meta descriptions was responsible for the closure of the entire operation is rather unfair!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

