<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cervical cancer jab: how the newspapers have learned nothing from MMR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/09/29/cervical-cancer-jab-reportin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/09/29/cervical-cancer-jab-reportin/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tutaj wstaw sensacyjny naglówek &#124; życie binarne</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/09/29/cervical-cancer-jab-reportin/#comment-11620</link>
		<dc:creator>tutaj wstaw sensacyjny naglówek &#124; życie binarne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3482#comment-11620</guid>
		<description>[...] Na łamach online journalism blog Malcolm Coles stworzył własny ranking nieodpowiedzialnych mediów przyznając im punkty za różne posunięcia w związku ze sprawą szczepionki. Za nagłówek sugerujący związek między szczepionką a śmiercią 14-latki: 20 punktów, za niewspomnienie o tym, ilu wypadkom śmiertelnym szczepionka statystycznie zapobiega: kolejne 20 i tak dalej. Wyniki nie były zresztą rewolucyjne; na pierwszym miejscu uplasowało się Daily Mail &#8211; 90% irresponsible (nieodpowiedzialne). Independent (50%) nieco wyżej niż The Sun (40%). Polecam reszte rankingu tutaj. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Na łamach online journalism blog Malcolm Coles stworzył własny ranking nieodpowiedzialnych mediów przyznając im punkty za różne posunięcia w związku ze sprawą szczepionki. Za nagłówek sugerujący związek między szczepionką a śmiercią 14-latki: 20 punktów, za niewspomnienie o tym, ilu wypadkom śmiertelnym szczepionka statystycznie zapobiega: kolejne 20 i tak dalej. Wyniki nie były zresztą rewolucyjne; na pierwszym miejscu uplasowało się Daily Mail &#8211; 90% irresponsible (nieodpowiedzialne). Independent (50%) nieco wyżej niż The Sun (40%). Polecam reszte rankingu tutaj. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resources and Links 08/10/09 &#171; Framing the Dot</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/09/29/cervical-cancer-jab-reportin/#comment-11619</link>
		<dc:creator>Resources and Links 08/10/09 &#171; Framing the Dot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3482#comment-11619</guid>
		<description>[...] Malcolm Coles over at the Online Journalism Blog rates our national newspapers by degrees of irresponsibility in how they have covered HPV.  Possibly [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malcolm Coles over at the Online Journalism Blog rates our national newspapers by degrees of irresponsibility in how they have covered HPV.  Possibly [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean the Blogonaut</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/09/29/cervical-cancer-jab-reportin/#comment-11618</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean the Blogonaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3482#comment-11618</guid>
		<description>Sad isn&#039;t it when you have to rely on medically qualified bloggers to get an accurate take on the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad isn&#8217;t it when you have to rely on medically qualified bloggers to get an accurate take on the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ana</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/09/29/cervical-cancer-jab-reportin/#comment-11617</link>
		<dc:creator>ana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3482#comment-11617</guid>
		<description>BBC Front desk, worldwide edition RSS feed:
&quot;Schoolgirl dies after cancer jab
A 14-year-old girl in Coventry has died shortly after being given a cervical cancer vaccine.&quot;

lead on the article page reads that &quot;the exact cause of death is unknown.&quot; But I had to go to the page to find out.

I work as a journalist - if i&#039;m ever tempted to grab attention like this i&#039;ll consider cutting off one or two of my fingers (and I&#039;m young, so this is for years to come).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBC Front desk, worldwide edition RSS feed:<br />
&#8220;Schoolgirl dies after cancer jab<br />
A 14-year-old girl in Coventry has died shortly after being given a cervical cancer vaccine.&#8221;</p>
<p>lead on the article page reads that &#8220;the exact cause of death is unknown.&#8221; But I had to go to the page to find out.</p>
<p>I work as a journalist &#8211; if i&#8217;m ever tempted to grab attention like this i&#8217;ll consider cutting off one or two of my fingers (and I&#8217;m young, so this is for years to come).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malcolmcoles</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/09/29/cervical-cancer-jab-reportin/#comment-11616</link>
		<dc:creator>malcolmcoles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3482#comment-11616</guid>
		<description>Cathy - I didn&#039;t see that link. I&#039;ll knock 20% off for it, and update the story. Thanks for pointing it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cathy &#8211; I didn&#8217;t see that link. I&#8217;ll knock 20% off for it, and update the story. Thanks for pointing it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/09/29/cervical-cancer-jab-reportin/#comment-11615</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3482#comment-11615</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s unfair not to point out that The Times ran a second article on the next page saying &quot;There will always be tragedies, but this vaccine will save thousands of lives&quot;

Having said that- an accountability barometer is a great idea and would love to see something like that on the NHS choices service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s unfair not to point out that The Times ran a second article on the next page saying &#8220;There will always be tragedies, but this vaccine will save thousands of lives&#8221;</p>
<p>Having said that- an accountability barometer is a great idea and would love to see something like that on the NHS choices service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul canning</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/09/29/cervical-cancer-jab-reportin/#comment-11614</link>
		<dc:creator>paul canning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3482#comment-11614</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s got to be some way to stop the Mail, to frighten them into thinking again before the run this sh*t again. Are the journalists in the NUJ? Don&#039;t they have some sort of rules being broken here? Can&#039;t they put them on the rack or waterboard them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s got to be some way to stop the Mail, to frighten them into thinking again before the run this sh*t again. Are the journalists in the NUJ? Don&#8217;t they have some sort of rules being broken here? Can&#8217;t they put them on the rack or waterboard them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

