<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pluck out your eyes: the anatomy of a super injunction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/10/15/super-injunctions-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/10/15/super-injunctions-explained/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet destroys Fred Goodwin&#8217;s &#8220;affair&#8221; super-injunction &#124; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/10/15/super-injunctions-explained/#comment-13339</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet destroys Fred Goodwin&#8217;s &#8220;affair&#8221; super-injunction &#124; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 19:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3587#comment-13339</guid>
		<description>[...] written before about superinjunctions, the difficulties of bloggers learning about reporting restrictions, and the problems the [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written before about superinjunctions, the difficulties of bloggers learning about reporting restrictions, and the problems the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah nash</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/10/15/super-injunctions-explained/#comment-13338</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 11:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3587#comment-13338</guid>
		<description>Would DA notices be more applicable to controlling media coverage of the MMR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would DA notices be more applicable to controlling media coverage of the MMR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Nash</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/10/15/super-injunctions-explained/#comment-13337</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3587#comment-13337</guid>
		<description>Could a super-injunction be granted if it was considered to be in the public interest? As I said, I do have strong reasons to believe that one has been put in place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could a super-injunction be granted if it was considered to be in the public interest? As I said, I do have strong reasons to believe that one has been put in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/10/15/super-injunctions-explained/#comment-13336</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3587#comment-13336</guid>
		<description>Super injunctions tend to be awarded in libel, privacy or confidentiality cases - I can&#039;t imagine any realistic situation where one might be granted preventing anti-MMR stories? Also, injunctions relate to specific pieces of information, not general types of stories. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super injunctions tend to be awarded in libel, privacy or confidentiality cases &#8211; I can&#8217;t imagine any realistic situation where one might be granted preventing anti-MMR stories? Also, injunctions relate to specific pieces of information, not general types of stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Nash</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/10/15/super-injunctions-explained/#comment-13335</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3587#comment-13335</guid>
		<description>I have strong reasons to believe that a Super Injunction exists to stop newspapers reporting any anti-MMR stories. This cannot be in the interest of Public Health. 
Does anyone know how long these things last?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have strong reasons to believe that a Super Injunction exists to stop newspapers reporting any anti-MMR stories. This cannot be in the interest of Public Health.<br />
Does anyone know how long these things last?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What does John Terry&#8217;s case mean for superinjuntions? &#124; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/10/15/super-injunctions-explained/#comment-13334</link>
		<dc:creator>What does John Terry&#8217;s case mean for superinjuntions? &#124; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3587#comment-13334</guid>
		<description>[...] superinjunction was overturned at about 1pm or 2pm on Friday. Needless to say, the papers had a field day over the [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] superinjunction was overturned at about 1pm or 2pm on Friday. Needless to say, the papers had a field day over the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Terry: another nail in the superinjunction coffin? &#187; malcolm coles</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/10/15/super-injunctions-explained/#comment-13333</link>
		<dc:creator>John Terry: another nail in the superinjunction coffin? &#187; malcolm coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3587#comment-13333</guid>
		<description>[...] superinjunction was overturned yesterday, at about 1pm or 2pm as far as I could make out. Needless to say, the [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] superinjunction was overturned yesterday, at about 1pm or 2pm as far as I could make out. Needless to say, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP Osgoode &#187; Did Barbara Streisand and Twitter beat the super-injunction?</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/10/15/super-injunctions-explained/#comment-13332</link>
		<dc:creator>IP Osgoode &#187; Did Barbara Streisand and Twitter beat the super-injunction?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=3587#comment-13332</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;super-injunction&#8221; is an extension of the familiar publication ban or gag order. A publication ban prevents [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;super-injunction&#8221; is an extension of the familiar publication ban or gag order. A publication ban prevents [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

