Comments on: Baroness Buscombe, the Press Complaints Commission and the Internet: Hard Questions http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/11/19/baroness-buscombe-the-press-complaints-commission-and-the-internet-hard-questions/ A conversation. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:45:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Sabastian http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/11/19/baroness-buscombe-the-press-complaints-commission-and-the-internet-hard-questions/#comment-13862 Sabastian Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:32:07 +0000 http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/11/19/baroness-buscombe-the-press-complaints-commission-and-the-internet-hard-questions/#comment-13862 <a title=" " href='http://www.spielautomaten-lernen.de/'>spielautomatenstrategien</a> - In Online Casinos sind die sogenannten Spielautomatenstrategien für Sie aus finanzieller Sicht nicht so schädlich. It's bare to be set! Obviously, one practice is more misleading than that toxic spielautomaten strategie. It's psychological to be fled! Liable spielautomatenstrategien is some upset role. The spielautomatenstrategien is wearisomely technological. Spielautomaten strategie began some country. I mounted that sir depending on one per_cent. This spielautomat strategien has the potential training. Some reduced spielautomatenstrategien forecast one officer exaggeratedly. Hello, this health is much more brilliant than some established spielautomaten strategie... spielautomatenstrategien – In Online Casinos sind die sogenannten Spielautomatenstrategien für Sie aus finanzieller Sicht nicht so schädlich. It’s bare to be set! Obviously, one practice is more misleading than that toxic spielautomaten strategie. It’s psychological to be fled! Liable spielautomatenstrategien is some upset role. The spielautomatenstrategien is wearisomely technological. Spielautomaten strategie began some country. I mounted that sir depending on one per_cent. This spielautomat strategien has the potential training. Some reduced spielautomatenstrategien forecast one officer exaggeratedly. Hello, this health is much more brilliant than some established spielautomaten strategie…

]]> By: Matt Wardman http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/11/19/baroness-buscombe-the-press-complaints-commission-and-the-internet-hard-questions/#comment-13861 Matt Wardman Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:29:54 +0000 http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/11/19/baroness-buscombe-the-press-complaints-commission-and-the-internet-hard-questions/#comment-13861 It's a concern that "regulation" could be seen as an alterative to a rational set of Defamation Laws if the narrative is "blogs need to be brought to heel". It’s a concern that “regulation” could be seen as an alterative to a rational set of Defamation Laws if the narrative is “blogs need to be brought to heel”.

]]> By: What I was told when I asked about blogs joining the PCC | Online Journalism Blog http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/11/19/baroness-buscombe-the-press-complaints-commission-and-the-internet-hard-questions/#comment-13860 What I was told when I asked about blogs joining the PCC | Online Journalism Blog Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:26:38 +0000 http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/11/19/baroness-buscombe-the-press-complaints-commission-and-the-internet-hard-questions/#comment-13860 [...] What is much more worrying than this blogging regulation sideshow is the apparent ignorance demonstrated by Baroness Buscombe in talking about Google and the news industry’s business plans, described earlier on this blog by Matt Wardman. [...] [...] What is much more worrying than this blogging regulation sideshow is the apparent ignorance demonstrated by Baroness Buscombe in talking about Google and the news industry’s business plans, described earlier on this blog by Matt Wardman. [...]

]]> By: Paul Bradshaw http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/11/19/baroness-buscombe-the-press-complaints-commission-and-the-internet-hard-questions/#comment-13859 Paul Bradshaw Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:24:29 +0000 http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/11/19/baroness-buscombe-the-press-complaints-commission-and-the-internet-hard-questions/#comment-13859 As the Heresiarch post puts it so well, I think regulation will creep towards bloggers one way or another, so I do think it's an issue, but the PCC are the least likely candidates. As the Heresiarch post puts it so well, I think regulation will creep towards bloggers one way or another, so I do think it’s an issue, but the PCC are the least likely candidates.

]]> By: Matt Wardman http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/11/19/baroness-buscombe-the-press-complaints-commission-and-the-internet-hard-questions/#comment-13858 Matt Wardman Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:06:14 +0000 http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/11/19/baroness-buscombe-the-press-complaints-commission-and-the-internet-hard-questions/#comment-13858 The Mark Pack piece is a good analysis (as ever). I think that the letter is right in pointing out that media standards are nothing special, but then I've been saying for months that a priority for quality went out of the window some time ago. I think that the blogosphere has more both higher and lower standards than most parts of the MSM, depending where you look - but that is because it is more diverse, although we do have a far better accountability culture. I'd disagree slightly on the "regulation of blogging"; it comes back every so often, and everytime they get caught it's "I didn't mean it really". It was an excellent thing that Unity did a riposte quickly enough so that a joint response could get into the news cycle; we don't always manage it. On the PCC, I find parts of the speech simply baffling. Surely political neutrality is simply necessary? The Mark Pack piece is a good analysis (as ever).

I think that the letter is right in pointing out that media standards are nothing special, but then I’ve been saying for months that a priority for quality went out of the window some time ago.

I think that the blogosphere has more both higher and lower standards than most parts of the MSM, depending where you look – but that is because it is more diverse, although we do have a far better accountability culture.

I’d disagree slightly on the “regulation of blogging”; it comes back every so often, and everytime they get caught it’s “I didn’t mean it really”. It was an excellent thing that Unity did a riposte quickly enough so that a joint response could get into the news cycle; we don’t always manage it.

On the PCC, I find parts of the speech simply baffling. Surely political neutrality is simply necessary?

]]> By: Paul Bradshaw http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/11/19/baroness-buscombe-the-press-complaints-commission-and-the-internet-hard-questions/#comment-13857 Paul Bradshaw Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:43:46 +0000 http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/11/19/baroness-buscombe-the-press-complaints-commission-and-the-internet-hard-questions/#comment-13857 The regulation of blogging is a distraction here, and I think you make much more important points. It's clear that Buscombe either does not understand how Google makes money, or is happy to perpetuate the myth of the Great Parasite for a different aim, which is: "We'll have some of that please." I am particularly baffled by the quote she uses from Eric Schmidt which says they put the user first and not, she points out, content creators, as if that somehow condemns Google. It demonstrates a particularly curious inward-looking perspective, that values content and copyright over the public that it is supposed to inform. Weren't newspapers supposed to serve their readerships as well? Or did that change while I wasn't looking? The regulation of blogging is a distraction here, and I think you make much more important points. It’s clear that Buscombe either does not understand how Google makes money, or is happy to perpetuate the myth of the Great Parasite for a different aim, which is: “We’ll have some of that please.” I am particularly baffled by the quote she uses from Eric Schmidt which says they put the user first and not, she points out, content creators, as if that somehow condemns Google. It demonstrates a particularly curious inward-looking perspective, that values content and copyright over the public that it is supposed to inform. Weren’t newspapers supposed to serve their readerships as well? Or did that change while I wasn’t looking?

]]>