<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wired stands by story after Guardian denies iPhone app paywall plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/01/15/guardian-iphone-paywall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/01/15/guardian-iphone-paywall/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: how to become a poli</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/01/15/guardian-iphone-paywall/#comment-14372</link>
		<dc:creator>how to become a poli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4242#comment-14372</guid>
		<description>I was thinking this when the app was launched. Although I’m not 100% comfortable with paywalls. Their Guardian iPhone app has been a success so they’re looking at ways to apply those lessons to other things they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking this when the app was launched. Although I’m not 100% comfortable with paywalls. Their Guardian iPhone app has been a success so they’re looking at ways to apply those lessons to other things they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S. James</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/01/15/guardian-iphone-paywall/#comment-14371</link>
		<dc:creator>John S. James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4242#comment-14371</guid>
		<description>An in-between approach could be called mass sponsorship. Following Harrison&#039;s comment re 20-30p for online access to a day&#039;s Guardian, let anybody buy any number of accesses (say 100 for £20, or less with a bulk discount) and get a special URL that allows 100 people to view free. The sponsor can include a message to the 100 -- and also give out the URL selectively, through social networks as desired. (This may work better for permanent access to a single investigative article, which some sponsors may want to promote -- and for music and other digital art marketed independently.)

There&#039;s more to it, and I&#039;ve developed a (hopefully) rights-free design at www.RepliCounts.org  I&#039;m looking for discussion on where to go with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An in-between approach could be called mass sponsorship. Following Harrison&#8217;s comment re 20-30p for online access to a day&#8217;s Guardian, let anybody buy any number of accesses (say 100 for £20, or less with a bulk discount) and get a special URL that allows 100 people to view free. The sponsor can include a message to the 100 &#8212; and also give out the URL selectively, through social networks as desired. (This may work better for permanent access to a single investigative article, which some sponsors may want to promote &#8212; and for music and other digital art marketed independently.)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more to it, and I&#8217;ve developed a (hopefully) rights-free design at <a href="http://www.RepliCounts.org" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.RepliCounts.org?referer=');">http://www.RepliCounts.org</a>  I&#8217;m looking for discussion on where to go with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Older consumers start getting into SMS (but for how much longer?)</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/01/15/guardian-iphone-paywall/#comment-14370</link>
		<dc:creator>Older consumers start getting into SMS (but for how much longer?)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4242#comment-14370</guid>
		<description>[...] Paywall for Guardian iPhone app? Wired hits back over Guardian denial (onlinejournalismblog.com) [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paywall for Guardian iPhone app? Wired hits back over Guardian denial (onlinejournalismblog.com) [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Harrison</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/01/15/guardian-iphone-paywall/#comment-14369</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4242#comment-14369</guid>
		<description>I was thinking this when the app was launched. Although I&#039;m not 100% comfortable with paywalls (they&#039;re an old media solution to a new media &#039;problem&#039;), I&#039;d happily pay a nominal fee (say 20 - 30p) for offline access to that day&#039;s edition of the Guardian. It&#039;s a lot less than I&#039;d pay if I actually bought a paper, plus I&#039;m supporting quality journalism, so I get a warm fuzzy glow in my belly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking this when the app was launched. Although I&#8217;m not 100% comfortable with paywalls (they&#8217;re an old media solution to a new media &#8216;problem&#8217;), I&#8217;d happily pay a nominal fee (say 20 &#8211; 30p) for offline access to that day&#8217;s edition of the Guardian. It&#8217;s a lot less than I&#8217;d pay if I actually bought a paper, plus I&#8217;m supporting quality journalism, so I get a warm fuzzy glow in my belly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/01/15/guardian-iphone-paywall/#comment-14368</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4242#comment-14368</guid>
		<description>Since this is all speculation, how about this?

Guardian Media Group (which is bigger than The Guardian) is exploring new ways to sell content. Their Guardian iPhone app has been a success so they&#039;re looking at ways to apply those lessons to other things they do. In-app purchases are an interesting thing so they mock up a version of the Guardian app to do them for columnists, since that fits the paid content conceptual model rather well (even though it makes no sense in reality).

Doesn&#039;t mean they&#039;re actually going to do it for Guardian content but they might for, say, some of the Emap publications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since this is all speculation, how about this?</p>
<p>Guardian Media Group (which is bigger than The Guardian) is exploring new ways to sell content. Their Guardian iPhone app has been a success so they&#8217;re looking at ways to apply those lessons to other things they do. In-app purchases are an interesting thing so they mock up a version of the Guardian app to do them for columnists, since that fits the paid content conceptual model rather well (even though it makes no sense in reality).</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re actually going to do it for Guardian content but they might for, say, some of the Emap publications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

