<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photographers to lose copyright and right to photograph in public (cached)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/03/02/photographers-to-lose-copyright-and-right-to-photograph-in-public-cached/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/03/02/photographers-to-lose-copyright-and-right-to-photograph-in-public-cached/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Institute of Pointless Laws &#124; Breki Tomasson</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/03/02/photographers-to-lose-copyright-and-right-to-photograph-in-public-cached/#comment-14774</link>
		<dc:creator>Institute of Pointless Laws &#124; Breki Tomasson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4488#comment-14774</guid>
		<description>[...] in a public place will, if the bill passes, now be considered to contain private data. Quoting the Online Journalism blog: This means that if you take a picture in the street and there is a member of the public in the [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in a public place will, if the bill passes, now be considered to contain private data. Quoting the Online Journalism blog: This means that if you take a picture in the street and there is a member of the public in the [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photographers to loose copyright &#124; Radical Images</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/03/02/photographers-to-lose-copyright-and-right-to-photograph-in-public-cached/#comment-14773</link>
		<dc:creator>Photographers to loose copyright &#124; Radical Images</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 19:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4488#comment-14773</guid>
		<description>[...] via Photographers to lose copyright and right to photograph in public (cached) &#124; Online Journalism Blog. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Photographers to lose copyright and right to photograph in public (cached) | Online Journalism Blog. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AL E.</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/03/02/photographers-to-lose-copyright-and-right-to-photograph-in-public-cached/#comment-14772</link>
		<dc:creator>AL E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 06:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4488#comment-14772</guid>
		<description>@ Matthew,
Exactly WHY is this bill needed? 

It seems to us in the US that liberties/freedoms in the UK have been under attack for many years. It&#039;s been said that failure to fight for your freedom results in a loss of your freedom...I happen to believe that.

Endless copyright, we don&#039;t need, but reasonable copyright laws should stand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Matthew,<br />
Exactly WHY is this bill needed? </p>
<p>It seems to us in the US that liberties/freedoms in the UK have been under attack for many years. It&#8217;s been said that failure to fight for your freedom results in a loss of your freedom&#8230;I happen to believe that.</p>
<p>Endless copyright, we don&#8217;t need, but reasonable copyright laws should stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photographers to lose copyright and right to photograph in public (cached) &#124; Online Journalism Blog &#171; flakes of nuisance</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/03/02/photographers-to-lose-copyright-and-right-to-photograph-in-public-cached/#comment-14771</link>
		<dc:creator>Photographers to lose copyright and right to photograph in public (cached) &#124; Online Journalism Blog &#171; flakes of nuisance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4488#comment-14771</guid>
		<description>[...] Photographers to lose copyright and right to photograph in public (cached) &#124; Online Journalism Blog. 0   break off a flake: [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photographers to lose copyright and right to photograph in public (cached) | Online Journalism Blog. 0   break off a flake: [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilJ</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/03/02/photographers-to-lose-copyright-and-right-to-photograph-in-public-cached/#comment-14770</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4488#comment-14770</guid>
		<description>Matthew above is absolutely right. This article makes some wildly inaccurate statements. If you are genuinely concerned, then don&#039;t rely on what you read on Blogs, read the text of the BIll and the Hansard record of debates from the House of Lords (which covered photography, and the safeguards intended to protect it, in depth).

There is also a useful webpage here: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/pro-types/pro-copy/c-policy/c-policy-orphanworks/c-policy-orphanworks-photo.htm which deals with some of the more recurrent points that are (wrongly) made about this legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew above is absolutely right. This article makes some wildly inaccurate statements. If you are genuinely concerned, then don&#8217;t rely on what you read on Blogs, read the text of the BIll and the Hansard record of debates from the House of Lords (which covered photography, and the safeguards intended to protect it, in depth).</p>
<p>There is also a useful webpage here: <a href="http://www.ipo.gov.uk/pro-types/pro-copy/c-policy/c-policy-orphanworks/c-policy-orphanworks-photo.htm" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.ipo.gov.uk/pro-types/pro-copy/c-policy/c-policy-orphanworks/c-policy-orphanworks-photo.htm?referer=');">http://www.ipo.gov.uk/pro-types/pro-copy/c-policy/c-policy-orphanworks/c-policy-orphanworks-photo.htm</a> which deals with some of the more recurrent points that are (wrongly) made about this legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/03/02/photographers-to-lose-copyright-and-right-to-photograph-in-public-cached/#comment-14769</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4488#comment-14769</guid>
		<description>The Digital Economy Bill if passed will be a disgrace and a tragedy for this once civilised nation. With &#039;people&#039; like unelected Mandelson in charge who needs enemies? And...Brian: The Bill is not being discussed openly in UK. The American Health Care Reform is being discussed openly in America. The  Reform does not compare with this covert attempt at limiting our freedom. Believe me, if you had benefitted from the National Health Service in UK, as I have, you would be well and truly thankful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Digital Economy Bill if passed will be a disgrace and a tragedy for this once civilised nation. With &#8216;people&#8217; like unelected Mandelson in charge who needs enemies? And&#8230;Brian: The Bill is not being discussed openly in UK. The American Health Care Reform is being discussed openly in America. The  Reform does not compare with this covert attempt at limiting our freedom. Believe me, if you had benefitted from the National Health Service in UK, as I have, you would be well and truly thankful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/03/02/photographers-to-lose-copyright-and-right-to-photograph-in-public-cached/#comment-14768</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4488#comment-14768</guid>
		<description>Hmm... for some reason, legislation like this--and the tactics used to force it through--reminds me A LOT of the American Healthcare &quot;Reform&quot; that President Obama is trying to ram through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; for some reason, legislation like this&#8211;and the tactics used to force it through&#8211;reminds me A LOT of the American Healthcare &#8220;Reform&#8221; that President Obama is trying to ram through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Orwell will be spinning in his grave&#8230;&#8230;. &#124; MRL Photography</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/03/02/photographers-to-lose-copyright-and-right-to-photograph-in-public-cached/#comment-14767</link>
		<dc:creator>George Orwell will be spinning in his grave&#8230;&#8230;. &#124; MRL Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4488#comment-14767</guid>
		<description>[...] will directly affect our abilities to make a living out of taking photos. Check out the full story here and just marvel at how bad it could be&#8230;&#8230;I mean this industry is cut throat and hard [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will directly affect our abilities to make a living out of taking photos. Check out the full story here and just marvel at how bad it could be&#8230;&#8230;I mean this industry is cut throat and hard [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: André</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/03/02/photographers-to-lose-copyright-and-right-to-photograph-in-public-cached/#comment-14766</link>
		<dc:creator>André</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4488#comment-14766</guid>
		<description>This simply leaves me speechles.
I was used to horrific messages from Britain (aka Big Brother and 1984), but this is just amazing. How can someone with at least a little bit of sanity come up with such an idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This simply leaves me speechles.<br />
I was used to horrific messages from Britain (aka Big Brother and 1984), but this is just amazing. How can someone with at least a little bit of sanity come up with such an idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/03/02/photographers-to-lose-copyright-and-right-to-photograph-in-public-cached/#comment-14765</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=4488#comment-14765</guid>
		<description>Mandelson is a reoccurring nightmare. How many times has he been shamed, only to be reinstated with a new and better title. The UK is becoming more like 1984 all the time. There are so many bodies against this bill but it&#039;s being pushed through the back door. It&#039;s a real concern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mandelson is a reoccurring nightmare. How many times has he been shamed, only to be reinstated with a new and better title. The UK is becoming more like 1984 all the time. There are so many bodies against this bill but it&#8217;s being pushed through the back door. It&#8217;s a real concern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

