<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kay Burley. Discuss.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/05/09/kay-burley-discuss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/05/09/kay-burley-discuss/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:38:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/05/09/kay-burley-discuss/#comment-15455</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8471#comment-15455</guid>
		<description>Bella is indeed a great writer. 
Heads up for anyone that searches for heart on paper in Google, you might end up at my domain. I registered it not knowing that the name already (semi) existed.
Jack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bella is indeed a great writer.<br />
Heads up for anyone that searches for heart on paper in Google, you might end up at my domain. I registered it not knowing that the name already (semi) existed.<br />
Jack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ella fitzanders</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/05/09/kay-burley-discuss/#comment-15454</link>
		<dc:creator>ella fitzanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 04:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8471#comment-15454</guid>
		<description>personally, i believe that poetry is far more interesting than journalism. while journalism is a technical necessity, check this out:

www.heartonpaper-bela.blogspot.com

i found this blog when surfing the web. she&#039;s incredible - just turned 15, a genius. she&#039;s in the process of publishing two books, one poetry, and one a novella. AND she&#039;s been called the &quot;voice of her generation.&quot; no one knows about her site, it&#039;s totally legitimate. comment on her stuff, it&#039;s indescribable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personally, i believe that poetry is far more interesting than journalism. while journalism is a technical necessity, check this out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.heartonpaper-bela.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.heartonpaper-bela.blogspot.com?referer=');">http://www.heartonpaper-bela.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>i found this blog when surfing the web. she&#8217;s incredible &#8211; just turned 15, a genius. she&#8217;s in the process of publishing two books, one poetry, and one a novella. AND she&#8217;s been called the &#8220;voice of her generation.&#8221; no one knows about her site, it&#8217;s totally legitimate. comment on her stuff, it&#8217;s indescribable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gillian Kalter</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/05/09/kay-burley-discuss/#comment-15453</link>
		<dc:creator>Gillian Kalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 11:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8471#comment-15453</guid>
		<description>I have watched Sky News for the last 20 years and I never got the feeling that its bias was obvious, until this election. Apart from the Kay Burley and Adam Boulton unseemly behaviour, the language that Sky News used was biased, e.g. the Conservatives were &quot;meeting* but the cabinet was in a &quot;huddle&quot; giving an impression of something seedy, Sky News journalists using the word &quot;sqatting&quot; in Number 10 as fact rather than as a comment on newspaper headlines. I have made more complaints during the last week than I have for years. I noticed that Alan Boulton&#039;s colleagues rallied round after his disgraceful behaviour as if he still had any credibility - in doing so, a lot of &quot;decent&quot; Sky journalists have lost their own credibility in my eyes. Finally, the BSkyB response to my complaint about Kay Burley, while expressing regret that the rigorous exchange with Mr Babbs was too harsh for my liking, contained the following: &quot;it was right that we challenged that case robustly on air, as we always do&quot;. I noticed that the BBC was not without bias as Andrew Neil lost his temper with Neil Kinnock live on DP. Again, calm guests, irate interviewer. It was not a pretty sight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have watched Sky News for the last 20 years and I never got the feeling that its bias was obvious, until this election. Apart from the Kay Burley and Adam Boulton unseemly behaviour, the language that Sky News used was biased, e.g. the Conservatives were &#8220;meeting* but the cabinet was in a &#8220;huddle&#8221; giving an impression of something seedy, Sky News journalists using the word &#8220;sqatting&#8221; in Number 10 as fact rather than as a comment on newspaper headlines. I have made more complaints during the last week than I have for years. I noticed that Alan Boulton&#8217;s colleagues rallied round after his disgraceful behaviour as if he still had any credibility &#8211; in doing so, a lot of &#8220;decent&#8221; Sky journalists have lost their own credibility in my eyes. Finally, the BSkyB response to my complaint about Kay Burley, while expressing regret that the rigorous exchange with Mr Babbs was too harsh for my liking, contained the following: &#8220;it was right that we challenged that case robustly on air, as we always do&#8221;. I noticed that the BBC was not without bias as Andrew Neil lost his temper with Neil Kinnock live on DP. Again, calm guests, irate interviewer. It was not a pretty sight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio Romo</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/05/09/kay-burley-discuss/#comment-15452</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio Romo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8471#comment-15452</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been some time since Kay Burley was a journalist. Today her job focuses more on that new genre &#039;journa-tainment.&#039;

Her holier than thou on-camera attitude is what in my opinion&#039;s made people disenfranchaised with journalism.

While I am not advocating that she has or should have a duty to strike a balance between two arguments I do believe that on many ocassions, especially during the recent UK election, she has strayed from journalism towards tribal news reporting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been some time since Kay Burley was a journalist. Today her job focuses more on that new genre &#8216;journa-tainment.&#8217;</p>
<p>Her holier than thou on-camera attitude is what in my opinion&#8217;s made people disenfranchaised with journalism.</p>
<p>While I am not advocating that she has or should have a duty to strike a balance between two arguments I do believe that on many ocassions, especially during the recent UK election, she has strayed from journalism towards tribal news reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Jones</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/05/09/kay-burley-discuss/#comment-15451</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 22:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8471#comment-15451</guid>
		<description>I think we&#039;re going to have to agree to disagree on this one.

As I explained in my first comment, during my six years of working there (2002-08) I never experienced any pressure to change my journalism to give a particular view, and never heard of this happening to any of my colleagues. By suggesting otherwise, and apparently without any evidence beyond the odd clip culled from YouTube, you are making a pretty serious allegation about the professional standards of all the journalists that work at Sky News, or have worked there in the recent past, including me.

So, you&#039;re going to have to forgive me for not agreeing with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#8217;re going to have to agree to disagree on this one.</p>
<p>As I explained in my first comment, during my six years of working there (2002-08) I never experienced any pressure to change my journalism to give a particular view, and never heard of this happening to any of my colleagues. By suggesting otherwise, and apparently without any evidence beyond the odd clip culled from YouTube, you are making a pretty serious allegation about the professional standards of all the journalists that work at Sky News, or have worked there in the recent past, including me.</p>
<p>So, you&#8217;re going to have to forgive me for not agreeing with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Dodson</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/05/09/kay-burley-discuss/#comment-15450</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Dodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8471#comment-15450</guid>
		<description>Sorry but I watch Sky News regularly and I sincerely think it is . You can *facepalm* all you like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry but I watch Sky News regularly and I sincerely think it is . You can *facepalm* all you like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Jones</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/05/09/kay-burley-discuss/#comment-15449</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8471#comment-15449</guid>
		<description>&quot;After months of biased pro-Tory reporting they must be really, really angry that they are not in yet.&quot;

*facepalm*

I refer you to my comment above.

On the Boulton/Campbell point, it might be useful to fill in a bit of background. The fact is they simply don&#039;t like each other very much. Boulton was always highly regarded by New Labour (he is now married to Tony Blair&#039;s former aide, Anji Hunter), and was offered Campbell&#039;s job after the 2001 election, which he turned down because he either didn&#039;t fancy it or because they weren&#039;t offering enough money, depending on what you believe.

During that campaign, Sky and Boulton in particular angered Campbell by breaking the story of John Prescott punching that bloke who threw an egg at him, and repeatedly running the footage. It seems Campbell never forgave Boulton for both this and for being lined up for his job, and so they&#039;ve not really got on ever since. On election night, Boulton squared off against Campbell and Ed Balls during Sky&#039;s live coverage after they&#039;d levelled this &#039;Boulton is pro-Tory&#039; slur at him during this election campaign.

I&#039;d say both Boulton and Burley went too far in the incidents which have been highlighted. But it&#039;s live telly, everyone&#039;s a bit over-excited and tired, I&#039;d argue these things sometimes happen. I don&#039;t really see how this can be extrapolated into a pro-Conservative conspiracy.

If the argument runs that Sky News is pro-Tory because Boulton is a Tory (I don&#039;t know what his personal politics are, although he says that he hasn&#039;t voted in an election since 1979), then you could similarly argue that the BBC is pro-Tory because Nick Robinson and Andrew Neil are sympathetic to the Tories, which they have been in their past careers (Robinson as head of the Young Conservatives, Neil as editor of the Tory-supporting Sunday Times for 13 years). But I&#039;d say such an argument would be nonsense. In my opinion those past views can&#039;t be detected in the reporting/presenting of Robinson and Neil, and I&#039;d give Boulton the same credit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;After months of biased pro-Tory reporting they must be really, really angry that they are not in yet.&#8221;</p>
<p>*facepalm*</p>
<p>I refer you to my comment above.</p>
<p>On the Boulton/Campbell point, it might be useful to fill in a bit of background. The fact is they simply don&#8217;t like each other very much. Boulton was always highly regarded by New Labour (he is now married to Tony Blair&#8217;s former aide, Anji Hunter), and was offered Campbell&#8217;s job after the 2001 election, which he turned down because he either didn&#8217;t fancy it or because they weren&#8217;t offering enough money, depending on what you believe.</p>
<p>During that campaign, Sky and Boulton in particular angered Campbell by breaking the story of John Prescott punching that bloke who threw an egg at him, and repeatedly running the footage. It seems Campbell never forgave Boulton for both this and for being lined up for his job, and so they&#8217;ve not really got on ever since. On election night, Boulton squared off against Campbell and Ed Balls during Sky&#8217;s live coverage after they&#8217;d levelled this &#8216;Boulton is pro-Tory&#8217; slur at him during this election campaign.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say both Boulton and Burley went too far in the incidents which have been highlighted. But it&#8217;s live telly, everyone&#8217;s a bit over-excited and tired, I&#8217;d argue these things sometimes happen. I don&#8217;t really see how this can be extrapolated into a pro-Conservative conspiracy.</p>
<p>If the argument runs that Sky News is pro-Tory because Boulton is a Tory (I don&#8217;t know what his personal politics are, although he says that he hasn&#8217;t voted in an election since 1979), then you could similarly argue that the BBC is pro-Tory because Nick Robinson and Andrew Neil are sympathetic to the Tories, which they have been in their past careers (Robinson as head of the Young Conservatives, Neil as editor of the Tory-supporting Sunday Times for 13 years). But I&#8217;d say such an argument would be nonsense. In my opinion those past views can&#8217;t be detected in the reporting/presenting of Robinson and Neil, and I&#8217;d give Boulton the same credit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Dodson</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/05/09/kay-burley-discuss/#comment-15448</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Dodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8471#comment-15448</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a better link here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XHuZqyuIS8

Are you still sure this isn&#039;t getting like Fox news? After months of biased pro-Tory reporting they must be really, really angry that they are not in yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a better link here: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XHuZqyuIS8" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XHuZqyuIS8&amp;referer=');">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XHuZqyuIS8</a></p>
<p>Are you still sure this isn&#8217;t getting like Fox news? After months of biased pro-Tory reporting they must be really, really angry that they are not in yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Wood</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/05/09/kay-burley-discuss/#comment-15447</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8471#comment-15447</guid>
		<description>Has everyone seen this beauty no-neck Adam Boulton:

http://www.twitvid.com/TXCUG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has everyone seen this beauty no-neck Adam Boulton:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.twitvid.com/TXCUG" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.twitvid.com/TXCUG?referer=');">http://www.twitvid.com/TXCUG</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Padraig McKeon</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/05/09/kay-burley-discuss/#comment-15446</link>
		<dc:creator>Padraig McKeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8471#comment-15446</guid>
		<description>Was the &#039;barracking&#039; pre-determined or was it a response to an interviewee who had very little to say for himself and who gave the impression in his body language that he expected to get an easy hearing as he was campaigning for something that might now seem self evident. The interview only got tough 2.15 in when the guy still hadn&#039;t given a decent response but still managed to maintain a cheesy smile. Strip away the prejudices that we might have either about the subject matter, the network or the person involved and we see one of these every day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was the &#8216;barracking&#8217; pre-determined or was it a response to an interviewee who had very little to say for himself and who gave the impression in his body language that he expected to get an easy hearing as he was campaigning for something that might now seem self evident. The interview only got tough 2.15 in when the guy still hadn&#8217;t given a decent response but still managed to maintain a cheesy smile. Strip away the prejudices that we might have either about the subject matter, the network or the person involved and we see one of these every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

