<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The News Diamond reimagined as &#8216;The Digital News Lifecycle&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/02/the-news-diamond-reimagined-as-the-digital-news-lifecycle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/02/the-news-diamond-reimagined-as-the-digital-news-lifecycle/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/02/the-news-diamond-reimagined-as-the-digital-news-lifecycle/#comment-15634</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8679#comment-15634</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a very good point - a specific problem is how you quantify reach/depth: does older coverage &#039;fade&#039; over time or is it indeed cumulative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a very good point &#8211; a specific problem is how you quantify reach/depth: does older coverage &#8216;fade&#8217; over time or is it indeed cumulative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Marcotte</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/02/the-news-diamond-reimagined-as-the-digital-news-lifecycle/#comment-15633</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Marcotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8679#comment-15633</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s a serious problem with the Mishra&#039;s diagram. By plotting a time axis against a reach/depth axis, he&#039;s created a useless paradigm because the reach/depth can never come down, it only goes up as the cumulative total increases. This is in keeping with the long-tail theory of information. I realize this may be a picky point but I hardly see how his diagram advances the model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s a serious problem with the Mishra&#8217;s diagram. By plotting a time axis against a reach/depth axis, he&#8217;s created a useless paradigm because the reach/depth can never come down, it only goes up as the cumulative total increases. This is in keeping with the long-tail theory of information. I realize this may be a picky point but I hardly see how his diagram advances the model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Visualizing the Lifecycle of Digital News Content &#171; Predicate, LLC &#124; Editorial + Content Strategy</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/02/the-news-diamond-reimagined-as-the-digital-news-lifecycle/#comment-15632</link>
		<dc:creator>Visualizing the Lifecycle of Digital News Content &#171; Predicate, LLC &#124; Editorial + Content Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8679#comment-15632</guid>
		<description>[...]   [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattwardman</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/02/the-news-diamond-reimagined-as-the-digital-news-lifecycle/#comment-15631</link>
		<dc:creator>mattwardman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8679#comment-15631</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.

Is it useful to have one view oriented around a live-blog as the timeline and backbone for impact of the different tools, since this method is used more and more for real stories?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.</p>
<p>Is it useful to have one view oriented around a live-blog as the timeline and backbone for impact of the different tools, since this method is used more and more for real stories?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattwardman</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/02/the-news-diamond-reimagined-as-the-digital-news-lifecycle/#comment-15630</link>
		<dc:creator>mattwardman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 23:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8679#comment-15630</guid>
		<description>We have an organisation view, and a story view.

Developing yuor point, I think we also need a perspective which catches the involvement of the reader community as they participate in conversation with, and around, an organisation, about a story.

I&#039;d start off by putting one reader at the centre of the new diagram, and imagining flows in and out via different channels to that single person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have an organisation view, and a story view.</p>
<p>Developing yuor point, I think we also need a perspective which catches the involvement of the reader community as they participate in conversation with, and around, an organisation, about a story.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d start off by putting one reader at the centre of the new diagram, and imagining flows in and out via different channels to that single person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret@contentetc</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/02/the-news-diamond-reimagined-as-the-digital-news-lifecycle/#comment-15629</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret@contentetc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8679#comment-15629</guid>
		<description>I agree. The point is increasingly about how to integrate the conversation. Also, in many ways this model also works for planned events, not just breaking news, certainly in the inital stages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. The point is increasingly about how to integrate the conversation. Also, in many ways this model also works for planned events, not just breaking news, certainly in the inital stages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ciclo de vida de las noticias digitales: el Diamante de noticias reimaginado &#124; tejiendo redes</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/02/the-news-diamond-reimagined-as-the-digital-news-lifecycle/#comment-15628</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciclo de vida de las noticias digitales: el Diamante de noticias reimaginado &#124; tejiendo redes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8679#comment-15628</guid>
		<description>[...] OJB    This entry was posted in periodismo 2.0 and tagged ciclo noticias digitales, diamante de [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OJB    This entry was posted in periodismo 2.0 and tagged ciclo noticias digitales, diamante de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recommended Links for June 3rd &#124; Alex Gamela - Digital Media &#38; Journalism</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/02/the-news-diamond-reimagined-as-the-digital-news-lifecycle/#comment-15627</link>
		<dc:creator>Recommended Links for June 3rd &#124; Alex Gamela - Digital Media &#38; Journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8679#comment-15627</guid>
		<description>[...] The News Diamond reimagined as ‘The Digital News Lifecycle’ [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The News Diamond reimagined as ‘The Digital News Lifecycle’ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2010-06-03 &#171; Onlinejournalismtest&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/02/the-news-diamond-reimagined-as-the-digital-news-lifecycle/#comment-15626</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2010-06-03 &#171; Onlinejournalismtest&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8679#comment-15626</guid>
		<description>[...] The News Diamond reimagined as ‘The Digital News Lifecycle’ &#124; Online Journalism Blog Blogged last night: The News Diamond reimagined as ‘The Digital News Lifecycle’ http://bit.ly/9hg1u6 (tags: via:packrati.us) [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The News Diamond reimagined as ‘The Digital News Lifecycle’ | Online Journalism Blog Blogged last night: The News Diamond reimagined as ‘The Digital News Lifecycle’ <a href="http://bit.ly/9hg1u6" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/bit.ly/9hg1u6?referer=');">http://bit.ly/9hg1u6</a> (tags: via:packrati.us) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/02/the-news-diamond-reimagined-as-the-digital-news-lifecycle/#comment-15625</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 08:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8679#comment-15625</guid>
		<description>Yes, agree completely. Gaurav is right to highlight that my diagram is from the news organisation&#039;s point of view, so the dotted lines are points at which they are taking in and inviting inputs from users. That doesn&#039;t mean that conversation won&#039;t take place around the article or the database, just that (at the time) I imagined it to be peripheral. I&#039;d probably just make the whole thing porous now as comments on an article will still inform the analysis, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, agree completely. Gaurav is right to highlight that my diagram is from the news organisation&#8217;s point of view, so the dotted lines are points at which they are taking in and inviting inputs from users. That doesn&#8217;t mean that conversation won&#8217;t take place around the article or the database, just that (at the time) I imagined it to be peripheral. I&#8217;d probably just make the whole thing porous now as comments on an article will still inform the analysis, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

