<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s stop this &#8216;Curation is King&#8217; crap right now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/17/lets-stop-this-curation-is-king-crap-right-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/17/lets-stop-this-curation-is-king-crap-right-now/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myrstad&#039;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kuratering &#8211; K U R A T E R I N G</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/17/lets-stop-this-curation-is-king-crap-right-now/#comment-15732</link>
		<dc:creator>Myrstad&#039;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kuratering &#8211; K U R A T E R I N G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 20:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8775#comment-15732</guid>
		<description>[...] det skulle være nok, så svømmer det over av bloggkommentarer om at Content Is Queen (or Dead) og ”Curation Is King”, og med økende kraft etter at Steve Rosenbaum, grunnleggeren av videokurator-verktøyet Magnify, [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] det skulle være nok, så svømmer det over av bloggkommentarer om at Content Is Queen (or Dead) og ”Curation Is King”, og med økende kraft etter at Steve Rosenbaum, grunnleggeren av videokurator-verktøyet Magnify, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Content curation: Definition before innovation?</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/17/lets-stop-this-curation-is-king-crap-right-now/#comment-15731</link>
		<dc:creator>Content curation: Definition before innovation?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 23:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8775#comment-15731</guid>
		<description>[...] Paul Bradshaw quotes a museum curator that dismisses content curation as nothing more than “selecting”, a sentiment with which many (including myself) would disagree. And so the term curation also [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paul Bradshaw quotes a museum curator that dismisses content curation as nothing more than “selecting”, a sentiment with which many (including myself) would disagree. And so the term curation also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2010-07-12 &#171; A Web editor&#039;s tale</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/17/lets-stop-this-curation-is-king-crap-right-now/#comment-15730</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2010-07-12 &#171; A Web editor&#039;s tale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8775#comment-15730</guid>
		<description>[...] Let’s stop this ‘Curation is King’ crap right now &#124; Online Journalism Blog also read comments as discussion continues (tags: aggregation contentstrategy blogging curation filter futureofnews journalism media news paulbradshaw onlinenewspapers) [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Let’s stop this ‘Curation is King’ crap right now | Online Journalism Blog also read comments as discussion continues (tags: aggregation contentstrategy blogging curation filter futureofnews journalism media news paulbradshaw onlinenewspapers) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2010-07-12 &#171; Onlinejournalismtest&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/17/lets-stop-this-curation-is-king-crap-right-now/#comment-15729</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2010-07-12 &#171; Onlinejournalismtest&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8775#comment-15729</guid>
		<description>[...] Let’s stop this ‘Curation is King’ crap right now &#124; Online Journalism Blog Steve Rosenbaum has responded to my &#039;Let&#039;s stop this Curation is King crap right now&#039; post http://bit.ly/9PEtju (tags: via:packrati.us) [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Let’s stop this ‘Curation is King’ crap right now | Online Journalism Blog Steve Rosenbaum has responded to my &#039;Let&#039;s stop this Curation is King crap right now&#039; post <a href="http://bit.ly/9PEtju" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/bit.ly/9PEtju?referer=');">http://bit.ly/9PEtju</a> (tags: via:packrati.us) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/17/lets-stop-this-curation-is-king-crap-right-now/#comment-15728</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 09:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8775#comment-15728</guid>
		<description>Thanks for responding on here, Steve. Although it kicked me off, I am not really talking about your post so much as the &#039;curation is king&#039; meme and how publishers normally interpret it. I agree with much of what you say above - content was never king (although it was a differentiator), and curation should be about moving power to the edges. But I know that when publishers read this and talk about it that&#039;s not how they see it - they see it as being about them being in control, and the user acting at most as providers of raw &#039;amateur&#039; content that needs their &#039;professional&#039; experience to edit, shape, etc. into a commodity. Like I say, in other words: business as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for responding on here, Steve. Although it kicked me off, I am not really talking about your post so much as the &#8216;curation is king&#8217; meme and how publishers normally interpret it. I agree with much of what you say above &#8211; content was never king (although it was a differentiator), and curation should be about moving power to the edges. But I know that when publishers read this and talk about it that&#8217;s not how they see it &#8211; they see it as being about them being in control, and the user acting at most as providers of raw &#8216;amateur&#8217; content that needs their &#8216;professional&#8217; experience to edit, shape, etc. into a commodity. Like I say, in other words: business as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/17/lets-stop-this-curation-is-king-crap-right-now/#comment-15727</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 18:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8775#comment-15727</guid>
		<description>Content is a commodity, just as it always has been. Whether you&#039;re talking about print or online, you have three routes: partner with a publisher/distributor who has the reach and marketing network to spread your work (NYT staff/Huffpo); self publish, read your work in coffee houses and hand it out on streetcorners (blog); or, get incredibly lucky and have a king-maker (Oprah) mention your name.  

(By the way... here&#039;s my street-corner ranting: www.stevediogo.com. If you&#039;re interested in exploring the content and business models that are working, check out.) 

Saying that we&#039;re in the &quot;curating&quot; business is like saying we were in the fish wrap business. Of course it&#039;s part of what we do. It&#039;s always been part of what we do. It&#039;s called editing. 

Navigating this business today takes creativity the likes of which we&#039;ve never seen. But isn&#039;t creativity why we got into it in the first place? We all need to stop the hand-wringing, learn the business and trudge on. There&#039;s great work to do out there if we just go do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Content is a commodity, just as it always has been. Whether you&#8217;re talking about print or online, you have three routes: partner with a publisher/distributor who has the reach and marketing network to spread your work (NYT staff/Huffpo); self publish, read your work in coffee houses and hand it out on streetcorners (blog); or, get incredibly lucky and have a king-maker (Oprah) mention your name.  </p>
<p>(By the way&#8230; here&#8217;s my street-corner ranting: <a href="http://www.stevediogo.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.stevediogo.com?referer=');">http://www.stevediogo.com</a>. If you&#8217;re interested in exploring the content and business models that are working, check out.) </p>
<p>Saying that we&#8217;re in the &#8220;curating&#8221; business is like saying we were in the fish wrap business. Of course it&#8217;s part of what we do. It&#8217;s always been part of what we do. It&#8217;s called editing. </p>
<p>Navigating this business today takes creativity the likes of which we&#8217;ve never seen. But isn&#8217;t creativity why we got into it in the first place? We all need to stop the hand-wringing, learn the business and trudge on. There&#8217;s great work to do out there if we just go do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rosenbaum</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/17/lets-stop-this-curation-is-king-crap-right-now/#comment-15726</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rosenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 17:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8775#comment-15726</guid>
		<description>As the writer of said &quot;crap&quot; post,  thought i&#039;d jump in here and add some context.

First of all,  let&#039;s explore the Kingdom - such as it is.  If &quot;content&quot; was king,  i&#039;d love someone to show me examples of that.  The King&#039;s have been the folks at the pointy end of the funnel.  The folks that owned the printing presses, TV antenna&#039;s,  cable TV franchises, and such. This expensive infrastructure gave them the power to say yes, or no,  and therefore the folks who made content had to go ask them for permission to publish and distribute.

Go ask any musician,  author,  or artist if they ever felt like a &quot;King&quot; when they moved their music, book, or painting through the old world of distribution. The Kingdom was controlled by the folks that owned the tools. 

So, argument #1,  content was NEVER king. And if anyone has an example otherwise, bring it on. 

Now, on to Curation and why I think calling it King is a good thing.  In the past,  publishing was a walled garden owned by the folks who controlled the system and the machines.  Curation is about a creative enterprise,  the gathering and selecting, and organizing of things -it&#039;s a human skill that is inherently allergic to scale.

So, Curation is about moving power from the center of the network to the edges.  A writing can both create and curate.  A musician can publish their music, and gather links to their favorite artists and influences.  Music downloads are income.  Music links to affiliates are also micro-payments.  Together,  music comes to me curated from artists,  not labels.  How is this bad for artist or creators. 

Yes, piracy is bad. But Aggregation and Curation isn&#039;t about piracy -it&#039;s about an evolving link economy that shares fairly with creators, publishers, and curators. 

Are the economics built and working yet.  No,  but there&#039;s some evidence that the flattening of the distribution system puts customers closer to creators...and gives Makers more of a chance to build relationships with readers and fans.

Curation is a buzz word.  But the buzz is good.  So I&#039;m all about it -until someone shows me a better way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the writer of said &#8220;crap&#8221; post,  thought i&#8217;d jump in here and add some context.</p>
<p>First of all,  let&#8217;s explore the Kingdom &#8211; such as it is.  If &#8220;content&#8221; was king,  i&#8217;d love someone to show me examples of that.  The King&#8217;s have been the folks at the pointy end of the funnel.  The folks that owned the printing presses, TV antenna&#8217;s,  cable TV franchises, and such. This expensive infrastructure gave them the power to say yes, or no,  and therefore the folks who made content had to go ask them for permission to publish and distribute.</p>
<p>Go ask any musician,  author,  or artist if they ever felt like a &#8220;King&#8221; when they moved their music, book, or painting through the old world of distribution. The Kingdom was controlled by the folks that owned the tools. </p>
<p>So, argument #1,  content was NEVER king. And if anyone has an example otherwise, bring it on. </p>
<p>Now, on to Curation and why I think calling it King is a good thing.  In the past,  publishing was a walled garden owned by the folks who controlled the system and the machines.  Curation is about a creative enterprise,  the gathering and selecting, and organizing of things -it&#8217;s a human skill that is inherently allergic to scale.</p>
<p>So, Curation is about moving power from the center of the network to the edges.  A writing can both create and curate.  A musician can publish their music, and gather links to their favorite artists and influences.  Music downloads are income.  Music links to affiliates are also micro-payments.  Together,  music comes to me curated from artists,  not labels.  How is this bad for artist or creators. </p>
<p>Yes, piracy is bad. But Aggregation and Curation isn&#8217;t about piracy -it&#8217;s about an evolving link economy that shares fairly with creators, publishers, and curators. </p>
<p>Are the economics built and working yet.  No,  but there&#8217;s some evidence that the flattening of the distribution system puts customers closer to creators&#8230;and gives Makers more of a chance to build relationships with readers and fans.</p>
<p>Curation is a buzz word.  But the buzz is good.  So I&#8217;m all about it -until someone shows me a better way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curation nation &#171; Brain Traffic Blog</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/17/lets-stop-this-curation-is-king-crap-right-now/#comment-15725</link>
		<dc:creator>Curation nation &#171; Brain Traffic Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8775#comment-15725</guid>
		<description>[...] content than content curation.&#8221; Still others believe the idea of &#8220;curation&#8221; is a huge copout that allows us to continue to ignore the content mess we&#8217;ve gotten ourselves into. Or, as [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] content than content curation.&rdquo; Still others believe the idea of &ldquo;curation&rdquo; is a huge copout that allows us to continue to ignore the content mess we&rsquo;ve gotten ourselves into. Or, as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: De informatieprofessional als curator &#124; VPOD</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/17/lets-stop-this-curation-is-king-crap-right-now/#comment-15724</link>
		<dc:creator>De informatieprofessional als curator &#124; VPOD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8775#comment-15724</guid>
		<description>[...] het kan ook anders. Zie het artikel van Paul Bradshaw, Let’s stop this ‘Curation is King’ crap right now. Bradshaw linkt onder meer naar nog weer een ander artikel waar men curation kernachtig wegzet als [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] het kan ook anders. Zie het artikel van Paul Bradshaw, Let’s stop this ‘Curation is King’ crap right now. Bradshaw linkt onder meer naar nog weer een ander artikel waar men curation kernachtig wegzet als [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2010/06/17/lets-stop-this-curation-is-king-crap-right-now/#comment-15723</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=8775#comment-15723</guid>
		<description>Fair point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

