<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How private is a tweet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/02/08/how-private-is-a-tweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/02/08/how-private-is-a-tweet/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:30:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy C</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/02/08/how-private-is-a-tweet/#comment-17859</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=12868#comment-17859</guid>
		<description>Maybe and as I have now read the PCC guidelines, I conclude that, although she justifiably felt picked on and victimised and it was undoubtedly a &#039;non story&#039;, she had absolutely no grounds of success with her complaints so why bother ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe and as I have now read the PCC guidelines, I conclude that, although she justifiably felt picked on and victimised and it was undoubtedly a &#8216;non story&#8217;, she had absolutely no grounds of success with her complaints so why bother ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention How private is a tweet? &#124; Online Journalism Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/02/08/how-private-is-a-tweet/#comment-17858</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention How private is a tweet? &#124; Online Journalism Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=12868#comment-17858</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paul Bradshaw, Online Journo Blog and Abigail Sawyer, Sergio J. Valera. Sergio J. Valera said: RT @paulbradshaw Interesting example in the comments of a private tweet being supplied to a journalist &amp; published: http://bit.ly/dJGAjK [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paul Bradshaw, Online Journo Blog and Abigail Sawyer, Sergio J. Valera. Sergio J. Valera said: RT @paulbradshaw Interesting example in the comments of a private tweet being supplied to a journalist &amp; published: <a href="http://bit.ly/dJGAjK" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/bit.ly/dJGAjK?referer=');">http://bit.ly/dJGAjK</a> [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Harrison</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/02/08/how-private-is-a-tweet/#comment-17857</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=12868#comment-17857</guid>
		<description>I happen to know Baskers, and I know she bought the complaint because she felt victimised and bullied by Quentin Letts and others. OK, the complaint of privacy may not be extremely accurate, but when you&#039;re dealing with the PCC, complaints have to be made against specific points, and, when you&#039;re dealing with a bully, you&#039;re going to use any methods available to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happen to know Baskers, and I know she bought the complaint because she felt victimised and bullied by Quentin Letts and others. OK, the complaint of privacy may not be extremely accurate, but when you&#8217;re dealing with the PCC, complaints have to be made against specific points, and, when you&#8217;re dealing with a bully, you&#8217;re going to use any methods available to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/02/08/how-private-is-a-tweet/#comment-17856</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=12868#comment-17856</guid>
		<description>Very interesting case, Scarlett - thanks. Without knowing the details of the situation, there is an obvious public interest case, but the content of the tweet itself doesn&#039;t seem that important. The closest analogy would be someone overhearing the same conversation between two people during a meeting. But I guess context is key here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting case, Scarlett &#8211; thanks. Without knowing the details of the situation, there is an obvious public interest case, but the content of the tweet itself doesn&#8217;t seem that important. The closest analogy would be someone overhearing the same conversation between two people during a meeting. But I guess context is key here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarlett Heydt</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/02/08/how-private-is-a-tweet/#comment-17855</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarlett Heydt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=12868#comment-17855</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting you blogged about tweets not being private. What about in terms of what a journalist should do if they are given access to a private Twitter account?  I recently stumbled on this story, what do you think the ethical call should have been?  http://downtowndevil.com/2011/02/08/asasud-senate-twitter-facebook-posts/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting you blogged about tweets not being private. What about in terms of what a journalist should do if they are given access to a private Twitter account?  I recently stumbled on this story, what do you think the ethical call should have been?  <a href="http://downtowndevil.com/2011/02/08/asasud-senate-twitter-facebook-posts/" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/downtowndevil.com/2011/02/08/asasud-senate-twitter-facebook-posts/?referer=');">http://downtowndevil.com/2011/02/08/asasud-senate-twitter-facebook-posts/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midweek media law mop up: Twitter in court consultation; PCC&#8217;s Twitter ruling; Twitter in Supreme Court (bored yet?) &#124; media law &#38; ethics</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/02/08/how-private-is-a-tweet/#comment-17854</link>
		<dc:creator>Midweek media law mop up: Twitter in court consultation; PCC&#8217;s Twitter ruling; Twitter in Supreme Court (bored yet?) &#124; media law &#38; ethics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=12868#comment-17854</guid>
		<description>[...] OnlineJournalismBlog&gt;&gt; How private is a tweet? [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OnlineJournalismBlog&gt;&gt; How private is a tweet? [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy C</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/02/08/how-private-is-a-tweet/#comment-17853</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=12868#comment-17853</guid>
		<description>What worries me most is that an intelligent woman who is a civil servant and active on multiple social networks can&#039;t fathom that a Tweet is in the public domain.

If she truly wanted her inane microblogging drivel to be strictly limited to her hundreds of followers, she should create a private feed but I suspect she raised the 2 PCC complaints to somehow make a name for herself which has now backfired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What worries me most is that an intelligent woman who is a civil servant and active on multiple social networks can&#8217;t fathom that a Tweet is in the public domain.</p>
<p>If she truly wanted her inane microblogging drivel to be strictly limited to her hundreds of followers, she should create a private feed but I suspect she raised the 2 PCC complaints to somehow make a name for herself which has now backfired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention How private is a tweet? &#124; Online Journalism Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/02/08/how-private-is-a-tweet/#comment-17852</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention How private is a tweet? &#124; Online Journalism Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=12868#comment-17852</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paul Bradshaw and Owain Betts, Jorge Luis Sierra. Jorge Luis Sierra said: RT @paulbradshaw: How private is a tweet? http://bit.ly/gGyEE0 [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paul Bradshaw and Owain Betts, Jorge Luis Sierra. Jorge Luis Sierra said: RT @paulbradshaw: How private is a tweet? <a href="http://bit.ly/gGyEE0" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/bit.ly/gGyEE0?referer=');">http://bit.ly/gGyEE0</a> [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Sayers</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/02/08/how-private-is-a-tweet/#comment-17851</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Sayers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=12868#comment-17851</guid>
		<description>Publishing a Twitter DM should be subject to the same laws as eavesdropping on phone calls or opening private mail. But a tweet or @reply is public, of course.

How private is a tweet? Not private. Public. That&#039;s kind of the point and the PCC, for once, is quite right, however juvenile and mean-spirited the original article.

If this woman&#039;s employers decided to stop her Twittering or disciplined her for doing so, that would be an interesting story. As far as I am aware they have not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publishing a Twitter DM should be subject to the same laws as eavesdropping on phone calls or opening private mail. But a tweet or @reply is public, of course.</p>
<p>How private is a tweet? Not private. Public. That&#8217;s kind of the point and the PCC, for once, is quite right, however juvenile and mean-spirited the original article.</p>
<p>If this woman&#8217;s employers decided to stop her Twittering or disciplined her for doing so, that would be an interesting story. As far as I am aware they have not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

