<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Objectivity has changed &#8211; why hasn&#8217;t journalism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/03/objectivity-has-changed-why-hasnt-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/03/objectivity-has-changed-why-hasnt-journalism/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:30:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Objectivity in journalism by gwall07 - Pearltrees</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/03/objectivity-has-changed-why-hasnt-journalism/#comment-238199</link>
		<dc:creator>Objectivity in journalism by gwall07 - Pearltrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13244#comment-238199</guid>
		<description>[...] Objectivity has changed – why hasn’t journalism? &#124; Online Journalism Blog David Mindich’s book on the history of objectivity , for example, is essential reading as an exploration of those roots: the rise of the scientific method in universities, and the increasing numbers of journalists to have passed through such education (as well as the rise of journalism schools); the establishment of the Associated Press and newswires in creating a neutral style that could be adapted by regional clients; and of course the increasing role of advertisers in funding publishing. When broadcast news came along, the principle of objective journalism was so well established that it was enshrined in broadcasting regulations, not least because of the small numbers of channels and the fear that one opinion might be allowed to dominate those. One of the reasons why I think studying journalism is so important at the moment is that the profession is rooted in a series of practices and beliefs that have specific historical roots – and things change. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Objectivity has changed – why hasn’t journalism? | Online Journalism Blog David Mindich’s book on the history of objectivity , for example, is essential reading as an exploration of those roots: the rise of the scientific method in universities, and the increasing numbers of journalists to have passed through such education (as well as the rise of journalism schools); the establishment of the Associated Press and newswires in creating a neutral style that could be adapted by regional clients; and of course the increasing role of advertisers in funding publishing. When broadcast news came along, the principle of objective journalism was so well established that it was enshrined in broadcasting regulations, not least because of the small numbers of channels and the fear that one opinion might be allowed to dominate those. One of the reasons why I think studying journalism is so important at the moment is that the profession is rooted in a series of practices and beliefs that have specific historical roots – and things change. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Objectivity in Journalism by jaywiles - Pearltrees</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/03/objectivity-has-changed-why-hasnt-journalism/#comment-238096</link>
		<dc:creator>Objectivity in Journalism by jaywiles - Pearltrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13244#comment-238096</guid>
		<description>[...] David Mindich’s book on the history of objectivity , for example, is essential reading as an exploration of those roots: the rise of the scientific method in universities, and the increasing numbers of journalists to have passed through such education (as well as the rise of journalism schools); the establishment of the Associated Press and newswires in creating a neutral style that could be adapted by regional clients; and of course the increasing role of advertisers in funding publishing. When broadcast news came along, the principle of objective journalism was so well established that it was enshrined in broadcasting regulations, not least because of the small numbers of channels and the fear that one opinion might be allowed to dominate those. One of the reasons why I think studying journalism is so important at the moment is that the profession is rooted in a series of practices and beliefs that have specific historical roots – and things change. Objectivity has changed – why hasn’t journalism? &#124; Online Journalism Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Mindich’s book on the history of objectivity , for example, is essential reading as an exploration of those roots: the rise of the scientific method in universities, and the increasing numbers of journalists to have passed through such education (as well as the rise of journalism schools); the establishment of the Associated Press and newswires in creating a neutral style that could be adapted by regional clients; and of course the increasing role of advertisers in funding publishing. When broadcast news came along, the principle of objective journalism was so well established that it was enshrined in broadcasting regulations, not least because of the small numbers of channels and the fear that one opinion might be allowed to dominate those. One of the reasons why I think studying journalism is so important at the moment is that the profession is rooted in a series of practices and beliefs that have specific historical roots – and things change. Objectivity has changed – why hasn’t journalism? | Online Journalism Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://www.google.com/imgres?q=objectivity+in+journalism&#38;um=1&#38;hl by adam.doyle - Pearltrees</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/03/objectivity-has-changed-why-hasnt-journalism/#comment-237663</link>
		<dc:creator>http://www.google.com/imgres?q=objectivity+in+journalism&#38;um=1&#38;hl by adam.doyle - Pearltrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13244#comment-237663</guid>
		<description>[...] Objectivity has changed – why hasn’t journalism? &#124; Online Journalism Blog  David Mindich’s book on the history of objectivity , for example, is essential reading as an exploration of those roots: the rise of the scientific method in universities, and the increasing numbers of journalists to have passed through such education (as well as the rise of journalism schools); the establishment of the Associated Press and newswires in creating a neutral style that could be adapted by regional clients; and of course the increasing role of advertisers in funding publishing. When broadcast news came along, the principle of objective journalism was so well established that it was enshrined in broadcasting regulations, not least because of the small numbers of channels and the fear that one opinion might be allowed to dominate those. One of the reasons why I think studying journalism is so important at the moment is that the profession is rooted in a series of practices and beliefs that have specific historical roots – and things change. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Objectivity has changed – why hasn’t journalism? | Online Journalism Blog  David Mindich’s book on the history of objectivity , for example, is essential reading as an exploration of those roots: the rise of the scientific method in universities, and the increasing numbers of journalists to have passed through such education (as well as the rise of journalism schools); the establishment of the Associated Press and newswires in creating a neutral style that could be adapted by regional clients; and of course the increasing role of advertisers in funding publishing. When broadcast news came along, the principle of objective journalism was so well established that it was enshrined in broadcasting regulations, not least because of the small numbers of channels and the fear that one opinion might be allowed to dominate those. One of the reasons why I think studying journalism is so important at the moment is that the profession is rooted in a series of practices and beliefs that have specific historical roots – and things change. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: journalims objectivity by shelby.renae - Pearltrees</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/03/objectivity-has-changed-why-hasnt-journalism/#comment-237351</link>
		<dc:creator>journalims objectivity by shelby.renae - Pearltrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 21:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13244#comment-237351</guid>
		<description>[...] Objectivity is one of the key pillars of journalistic identity: it is one of the ways in which we identify ourselves as a profession. But for the past decade it has been subject to increasing criticism from those (and I include myself here) who suggest that sustaining the appearance of objectivity is unfeasible and unsustainable, and that transparency is a much more realistic aim . Recently I’ve been revisiting some of the research on journalistic objectivity for my inaugural lecture at City University. But as I only mention objectivity once in that lecture, I thought it was worth fleshing out the issue further. has journalism changed? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Objectivity is one of the key pillars of journalistic identity: it is one of the ways in which we identify ourselves as a profession. But for the past decade it has been subject to increasing criticism from those (and I include myself here) who suggest that sustaining the appearance of objectivity is unfeasible and unsustainable, and that transparency is a much more realistic aim . Recently I’ve been revisiting some of the research on journalistic objectivity for my inaugural lecture at City University. But as I only mention objectivity once in that lecture, I thought it was worth fleshing out the issue further. has journalism changed? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/03/objectivity-has-changed-why-hasnt-journalism/#comment-51176</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13244#comment-51176</guid>
		<description>Thanks - will take a look at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; will take a look at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Danylkiw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/03/objectivity-has-changed-why-hasnt-journalism/#comment-51171</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Danylkiw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13244#comment-51171</guid>
		<description>Stella Bruzzi has a nice discussion of the myth of objectivity in her book &#039;New Documentary&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stella Bruzzi has a nice discussion of the myth of objectivity in her book &#8216;New Documentary&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Danylkiw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/03/objectivity-has-changed-why-hasnt-journalism/#comment-51148</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Danylkiw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13244#comment-51148</guid>
		<description>Objective journalism never existed; it&#039;s a myth. What&#039;s more the perpetuation of the myth (that it ever existed in the first place) I think is what stands in the way of journalism evolving successfully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Objective journalism never existed; it&#8217;s a myth. What&#8217;s more the perpetuation of the myth (that it ever existed in the first place) I think is what stands in the way of journalism evolving successfully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/03/objectivity-has-changed-why-hasnt-journalism/#comment-51094</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13244#comment-51094</guid>
		<description>What book are you referring to? The Mindich one is available on Amazon - I have no connection with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What book are you referring to? The Mindich one is available on Amazon &#8211; I have no connection with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kasule abdu</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/03/objectivity-has-changed-why-hasnt-journalism/#comment-49462</link>
		<dc:creator>kasule abdu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13244#comment-49462</guid>
		<description>please can I be allowed to access the book for academic use.
i am a student of Cavendish university Uganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please can I be allowed to access the book for academic use.<br />
i am a student of Cavendish university Uganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/03/objectivity-has-changed-why-hasnt-journalism/#comment-18041</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 08:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13244#comment-18041</guid>
		<description>Thanks - will check that out. Anything online?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; will check that out. Anything online?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

