<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 predictions for journalism in 25 years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/05/5-predictions-for-journalism-in-25-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/05/5-predictions-for-journalism-in-25-years/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:30:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The luxury of thought – slow journalism part 2 &#171; oddfish</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/05/5-predictions-for-journalism-in-25-years/#comment-109639</link>
		<dc:creator>The luxury of thought – slow journalism part 2 &#171; oddfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 09:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13451#comment-109639</guid>
		<description>[...] Bradshaw, ‘Five predictions for journalism in 25 years’, Online Journalism Blog March 3, 2011 ‘Number 2: Prices will head [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bradshaw, ‘Five predictions for journalism in 25 years’, Online Journalism Blog March 3, 2011 ‘Number 2: Prices will head [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time to think – slow journalism part 2 &#171; oddfish</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/05/5-predictions-for-journalism-in-25-years/#comment-109622</link>
		<dc:creator>Time to think – slow journalism part 2 &#171; oddfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 09:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13451#comment-109622</guid>
		<description>[...] Bradshaw, ‘Five predictions for journalism in 25 years’, Online Journalism Blog March 3, 2011 ‘Number 2: Prices will head [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bradshaw, ‘Five predictions for journalism in 25 years’, Online Journalism Blog March 3, 2011 ‘Number 2: Prices will head [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw: 5 predictions for journalism in 25 years</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/05/5-predictions-for-journalism-in-25-years/#comment-18101</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw: 5 predictions for journalism in 25 years</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13451#comment-18101</guid>
		<description>[...] Paul has posted an update on his online journalism blog. &#8220;As if to prove a point my point in Prediction No 4, here&#8217;s Saab buying a blog about [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paul has posted an update on his online journalism blog. &#8220;As if to prove a point my point in Prediction No 4, here&#8217;s Saab buying a blog about [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Linford</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/05/5-predictions-for-journalism-in-25-years/#comment-18100</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Linford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13451#comment-18100</guid>
		<description>You can read the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/090304abcfigs.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;latest circulation figures&lt;/a&gt; here on HoldtheFrontPage Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can read the <a href="http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/090304abcfigs.shtml" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/090304abcfigs.shtml?referer=');">latest circulation figures</a> here on HoldtheFrontPage Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Hersh</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/05/5-predictions-for-journalism-in-25-years/#comment-18099</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Hersh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 20:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13451#comment-18099</guid>
		<description>People are very important of course but the technology affects almost every field of lives, for example: the ipod, ipad, plasma TV, computer etc&#039;. 
vikifiles.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are very important of course but the technology affects almost every field of lives, for example: the ipod, ipad, plasma TV, computer etc&#8217;.<br />
vikifiles.wordpress.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medial Digital&#187; Linktipps Neu &#187; Linktipps zum Wochenstart: Vertrauenswürdige Datenknoten</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/05/5-predictions-for-journalism-in-25-years/#comment-18098</link>
		<dc:creator>Medial Digital&#187; Linktipps Neu &#187; Linktipps zum Wochenstart: Vertrauenswürdige Datenknoten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 16:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13451#comment-18098</guid>
		<description>[...] 5 predictions for journalism in 25 years [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5 predictions for journalism in 25 years [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Demain</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/03/05/5-predictions-for-journalism-in-25-years/#comment-18097</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Demain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 23:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=13451#comment-18097</guid>
		<description>I think 5. is the safest bet of the bunch; as older journalists retire what is currently wielded especially by those under 30 will flourish and become a standard. That point is guaranteed to be at minimum partly right. For the young uns&#039; of that time they&#039;ll be a bunch of equivalents to today&#039;s innovation, together with ideas jostling for influence.

Like the ideal of 3. - it sounds almost a full circle in that the freelancing atmosphere of pre-1980s journalism will revive. Better news and more individualism flourished back then, but I struggle to see how the press wires work into this equation - a compact staff doling out stuff en masse has suited them well. It&#039;s more selfsame slabs of dark or milk than a selection box today.

That isn&#039;t necessarily a question since (as you say) there&#039;s a well-established vanity to future speculations - let alone theorizing about speculation. Despite that it can adopt a sort of IGY whimsy, the optimism of which isn&#039;t amiss in the tumult of this world.

The Liverpool Echo may not be owned by Trinity Mirror in 25 years; the behaviour of the firm suggests an exit strategy, albeit one with some residual portion in online media like Media Wales. 

Once the library downtown opens again I&#039;ll probably garner some pictures of the old broadsheets that characterized a pre-tabloid Trinity. For a few decades in the 20th century working class people gladly read broadsheets; I don&#039;t trust the old people I speak to regards the quality, given that the memory is a kind, gentle judge.

Is it next month that the Press Gazette will publish its circulation charts? Be interesting to see how the local dailies here fare. I&#039;m reckoning another 11-13% fall for the Post, with the Echo on an 8-10% drop.

Speaking of predictions, I believe that bet of ours concerning the News Corp. paywalls is soon to be determined. I&#039;m guessing the stats will be published by the aforementioned Gazette, or journalism.co.uk? Should be fun in any case.

- Pete</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 5. is the safest bet of the bunch; as older journalists retire what is currently wielded especially by those under 30 will flourish and become a standard. That point is guaranteed to be at minimum partly right. For the young uns&#8217; of that time they&#8217;ll be a bunch of equivalents to today&#8217;s innovation, together with ideas jostling for influence.</p>
<p>Like the ideal of 3. &#8211; it sounds almost a full circle in that the freelancing atmosphere of pre-1980s journalism will revive. Better news and more individualism flourished back then, but I struggle to see how the press wires work into this equation &#8211; a compact staff doling out stuff en masse has suited them well. It&#8217;s more selfsame slabs of dark or milk than a selection box today.</p>
<p>That isn&#8217;t necessarily a question since (as you say) there&#8217;s a well-established vanity to future speculations &#8211; let alone theorizing about speculation. Despite that it can adopt a sort of IGY whimsy, the optimism of which isn&#8217;t amiss in the tumult of this world.</p>
<p>The Liverpool Echo may not be owned by Trinity Mirror in 25 years; the behaviour of the firm suggests an exit strategy, albeit one with some residual portion in online media like Media Wales. </p>
<p>Once the library downtown opens again I&#8217;ll probably garner some pictures of the old broadsheets that characterized a pre-tabloid Trinity. For a few decades in the 20th century working class people gladly read broadsheets; I don&#8217;t trust the old people I speak to regards the quality, given that the memory is a kind, gentle judge.</p>
<p>Is it next month that the Press Gazette will publish its circulation charts? Be interesting to see how the local dailies here fare. I&#8217;m reckoning another 11-13% fall for the Post, with the Echo on an 8-10% drop.</p>
<p>Speaking of predictions, I believe that bet of ours concerning the News Corp. paywalls is soon to be determined. I&#8217;m guessing the stats will be published by the aforementioned Gazette, or journalism.co.uk? Should be fun in any case.</p>
<p>- Pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

