<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blocking content sites by &#8216;self-regulation&#8217; &#8211; a recipe for easy censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/04/01/blocking-content-sites-by-self-regulation-a-recipe-for-easy-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/04/01/blocking-content-sites-by-self-regulation-a-recipe-for-easy-censorship/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:30:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2011-04-04 &#124; Joanna Geary</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/04/01/blocking-content-sites-by-self-regulation-a-recipe-for-easy-censorship/#comment-18248</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2011-04-04 &#124; Joanna Geary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=14044#comment-18248</guid>
		<description>[...] Blocking content sites by ‘self-regulation’ – a recipe for easy censorship &#124; Online Journalism... The point is not blocking sites, but the ease with which it might be done. If distribution van drivers ‘self-regulated’ to stop delivering newspapers whenever anyone complained, publishers and journalists would have a problem. An avenue to appeal doesn’t solve it, because by then the editorial moment will likely have passed – not to mention the extra costs it incurs for content producers. (tags: journalism law) [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blocking content sites by ‘self-regulation’ – a recipe for easy censorship | Online Journalism&#8230; The point is not blocking sites, but the ease with which it might be done. If distribution van drivers ‘self-regulated’ to stop delivering newspapers whenever anyone complained, publishers and journalists would have a problem. An avenue to appeal doesn’t solve it, because by then the editorial moment will likely have passed – not to mention the extra costs it incurs for content producers. (tags: journalism law) [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

