<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The £10,000 question: who benefits most from a tax threshold change?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2012/01/27/the-10000-question-who-benefits-most-from-a-tax-threshold-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2012/01/27/the-10000-question-who-benefits-most-from-a-tax-threshold-change/</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:46:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What are you trying to obfuscate? - Mardahl.dk</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2012/01/27/the-10000-question-who-benefits-most-from-a-tax-threshold-change/#comment-309995</link>
		<dc:creator>What are you trying to obfuscate? - Mardahl.dk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=15755#comment-309995</guid>
		<description>[...] one post, he asks the £10,000 question: who benefits most from a tax threshold change? What wonderful real-life examples. Go read the article and see whether you can spot the difference [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one post, he asks the £10,000 question: who benefits most from a tax threshold change? What wonderful real-life examples. Go read the article and see whether you can spot the difference [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2012/01/27/the-10000-question-who-benefits-most-from-a-tax-threshold-change/#comment-306926</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=15755#comment-306926</guid>
		<description>Thanks Guido - you&#039;re right. Blame tired eyes at the end of a Friday afternoon. Have now corrected wealthiest/poorest although the central thrust of the post is unchanged: how two charts can tell very different stories about the same data. Also the importance of linking to the raw data (credit to you for linking to some ONS data).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Guido &#8211; you&#8217;re right. Blame tired eyes at the end of a Friday afternoon. Have now corrected wealthiest/poorest although the central thrust of the post is unchanged: how two charts can tell very different stories about the same data. Also the importance of linking to the raw data (credit to you for linking to some ONS data).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido Fawkes</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2012/01/27/the-10000-question-who-benefits-most-from-a-tax-threshold-change/#comment-306716</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido Fawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=15755#comment-306716</guid>
		<description>You have completely cocked up this story.

In the IFS chart the seventh decile benefit the most.

In mine the second decile benefits the most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have completely cocked up this story.</p>
<p>In the IFS chart the seventh decile benefit the most.</p>
<p>In mine the second decile benefits the most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

