<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Online Journalism Blog &#187; ABC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/tag/abc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com</link>
	<description>A conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:06:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='onlinejournalismblog.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>ABCe: please sort out your terrible website (again)</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/06/25/abce-terrible-website-again/</link>
		<comments>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/06/25/abce-terrible-website-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>malcolm coles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[data journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.com/?p=2892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In March, I appealed to the Audit Bureau of Circulations to sort out its terrible ABCe website. It's had a redesign. Here's a list of its latest problems.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinejournalismblog.com%2F2009%2F06%2F25%2Fabce-terrible-website-again%2F" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http_3A_2F_2Fonlinejournalismblog.com_2F2009_2F06_2F25_2Fabce-terrible-website-again_2F&amp;referer=');"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinejournalismblog.com%2F2009%2F06%2F25%2Fabce-terrible-website-again%2F&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>In March, <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/abce-terrible-website/" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/abce-terrible-website/?referer=');">I appealed to the Audit Bureau of Circulations to sort out its terrible ABCe website</a>. It&#8217;s had a redesign. Here&#8217;s a list of its latest problems (<a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/abce-terrible-website-again/" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/abce-terrible-website-again/?referer=');">originally published here</a>).</p>
<p>If at any point the ABC wants to pay me a consultancy fee, for all this free advice, just leave me a comment to tell me how to receive my money &#8230;</p>
<h3>All the URLs have changed but there are no redirects</h3>
<div id="attachment_2894" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 499px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2894" src="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/new-abce-homepage.png" alt="New ABCe homepage in Google" width="489" height="178" /><p class="wp-caption-text">New ABCe homepage in Google</p></div>
<p>They&#8217;ve had a redesign, but they haven&#8217;t redirected the old URLs to new ones. So, for instance, if you click the second link shown in Google for a search on ABCe, you get page not found.</p>
<p><strong>Lesson</strong> When relaunching a website, always 301 redirect your old pages to new ones (even if they&#8217;re all just to your new home page). That way, external links still work and you keep the SEO benefit of any links.</p>
<h3>They haven&#8217;t sorted www vs non www</h3>
<p>The more observant will have noticed that the title of the first result in that screenshot says &#8216;To access IIS Help&#8217;. The ABC hasn&#8217;t realised that abce.org.uk is not the same URL as www.abce.org.uk. And if you go to the ABC URLs without www, you get page not found or server errors.</p>
<p>Compare these pages:</p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://www.abc.org.uk/" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.abc.org.uk/?referer=');">www.abc.org.uk</a></li>
<li><a href="http://abc.org.uk/" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/abc.org.uk/?referer=');">abc.org.uk</a></li>
</ul>
<p>and these ones:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.abce.org.uk/" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.abce.org.uk/?referer=');"> www.abce.org.uk</a></li>
<li><a href="http://abce.org.uk/" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/abce.org.uk/?referer=');">abce.org.uk</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Lesson </strong>When you set up your website, redirect yourdomain.co.uk/whatever to www.yourdomain.co.uk/whatever. And log in to your google webmaster account to set your preferred domain (www or non-www).</p>
<h3>They&#8217;re running two absolutely identical websites</h3>
<div id="attachment_2895" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 500px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2895" src="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/new-abce-homepage2.jpg" alt="ABCs new homepage. No, it's ABCe's. No, it's aaaaggghhh" width="490" height="307" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABCs new homepage. No, it&#039;s ABCe&#039;s. No, it&#039;s aaaaggghhh</p></div>
<p>You can access the entire website at <a href="http://www.abc.org.uk" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.abc.org.uk?referer=');">www.abc.org.uk</a> &#8211; or you can see an identical website at <a href="http://www.abce.org.uk" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.abce.org.uk?referer=');">www.abce.org.uk</a>.<span id="more-2892"></span></p>
<p>The only difference for each and every page across the two sites is whether there is an e in the domain name or not. For instance, compare these two URLs:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.abc.org.uk/Corporate/AboutABCe/StandardsandMetrics.aspx" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.abc.org.uk/Corporate/AboutABCe/StandardsandMetrics.aspx?referer=');">www.abc.org.uk/Corporate/AboutABCe/StandardsandMetrics.aspx</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.abce.org.uk/Corporate/AboutABCe/StandardsandMetrics.aspx" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.abce.org.uk/Corporate/AboutABCe/StandardsandMetrics.aspx?referer=');">www.abce.org.uk/Corporate/AboutABCe/StandardsandMetrics.aspx</a></li>
</ul>
<p>The same is true for every URL. This will cause problems with duplicate content in search engines, plus splitting incoming links over two URLs is problematic for SEO.</p>
<p>They do have two brands &#8211; ABC for print, ABCe for online &#8211; but they don&#8217;t need two websites. And even if they did, they wouldn&#8217;t need two identical ones.</p>
<p><strong>Lesson</strong> Have a website. Don&#8217;t have another identical one.</p>
<h3>The navigation is inconsistent</h3>
<p>If you go, say, <a href="http://www.abc.org.uk/Corporate/AboutABCe/roleABCe.aspx" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.abc.org.uk/Corporate/AboutABCe/roleABCe.aspx?referer=');">here</a>, some related links appear in the right:</p>
<ul>
<li> If you click on the first one, JICwebs, then a jargon buster sudenly appears in the left hand menu, under the links that are for subscribers only.</li>
<li>If you click on the second one &#8211; the jargon buster &#8211; you get page not found.</li>
<li>If you click the others, some random stuff happens.</li>
</ul>
<p>As far as I can work out, the top navigation bar controls the right hand related links box which in turn controls the left-hand menu.</p>
<p>Some pages have a right hand menu with related links, some are full-width with no right hand menu, and some have an empty right hand menu.</p>
<p><strong>Lesson</strong> Make your navigation consistent. And keep things that are together, together. Having the top, left and right navigations interdependant AND inconsistent is really confusing. And use templates consistently.</p>
<h3>Some minor points</h3>
<ul>
<li> <strong>Login not clear</strong> To get to most pages, you need to login. It&#8217;s not clear which pages require this. Although on <a href="http://www.abc.org.uk/Corporate/Resources/marketing.aspx" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.abc.org.uk/Corporate/Resources/marketing.aspx?referer=');">this page</a> it says &#8220;only members can access the following pages&#8221; and you can click on the links, so clearly they&#8217;re confused at ABCe too &#8230;</li>
<li><strong>Titles unclear </strong>Although the titles have improved since the last site, they still aren&#8217;t ideal. For a start, capitalisation is random. And secondly, they don&#8217;t show the site structure. Instead of going &#8216;Page name &#8211; Section &#8211; ABCe&#8217;, they just show the page name. This looks unclear in Google.</li>
<li><strong>Descriptions poor</strong> The descriptions aren&#8217;t proper English. This isn&#8217;t grammatically correct: &#8220;How to become a subscriber to ABCe and what are the benefits of doing so.&#8221;</li>
<li><strong>Too many link styles </strong>Some links are blue italic. Some are black underlined. Some are red not underlined. Some are grey. Make your mind up &#8230;</li>
<li><strong>Missing images </strong>There&#8217;s a contact list but all the photos are missing.</li>
</ul>
<p>I could go on &#8211; there&#8217;s more. But I won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Yet despite these basic problems, they&#8217;re using <a href="http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/sifr/" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.mikeindustries.com/blog/sifr/?referer=');">SIFR</a> to show fancy fonts. I think they should concentrate on these other things &#8230;</p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinejournalismblog.com%2F2009%2F06%2F25%2Fabce-terrible-website-again%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=80" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/06/25/abce-terrible-website-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

