7 ways to blog anonymously {updated}

Following today’s landmark judgement on one blogger’s right (or not) to anonymity, I thought it might be useful to post the following tips on maintaining anonymity online.

1. Use an anonymous email account to register your blog. Hushmail is one free service that provides encrypted accounts; RiseUp is aimed at activists; MintEmail gives you a 3 hour temporary email address and FilzMail gives you one that expires after 24 hours. You could also use these to post to your blog via email. Posterous is a great blogging service that allows you to do this.

2. Make sure your IP address isn’t logged when you register or post to the blog. You could use something like Anonymizer or Tor or Psiphon. Other services that mask your IP are listed on this forum.

3. Or you could use an anonymous blogging platform. Invisiblog was one but no longer exists. BlogACause claims to be “anonymous” but I’m trying to find out exactly how UPDATE: here’s how, apparently. In the meantime, this post recommends Wordpress and something like Tor.

4. Use a pseudonym that you don’t use anywhere else. If you use a pseudonym, don’t use it on other services as well, as this will make it easier to trace you. If you’re struggling, this Random Name Generator will create one for you.

5. If you’re going to register a domain name do so anonymously with a service like The Online Policy Group.

6. Be careful what information you include. Although police blogger NightJack changed or did not include names in cases he was involved in, the details were specific enough for a journalist to track him down.

7. Don’t win awards. Or book deals. It’s safe to say that a major newspaper would not have been interested in the identities of NightJack or Girl With A One Track Mind if both had remained cult underground heroes. So just pretend you’re sub-literate, OK?

For more information, the following guides go into much more detail:

More links and tips welcome. My Delicious bookmarks on anonymity are at http://delicious.com/paulb/anonymity

Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback:

8 Comments

  1. Posted June 16, 2009 at 11:08 pm | Permalink

    Also, re: #4. It’s not particularly reassuring that in visiting The Online Policy Group, one is informed that the site’s SSL certificate is no longer valid.

  2. Mrs Jackson
    Posted June 17, 2009 at 9:10 pm | Permalink

    Didn’t Night Jack use Word Press?

  3. Posted June 17, 2009 at 9:42 pm | Permalink

    He did use Wordpress. At the end of the day, he could have used all the technology in the world, but it was the detail in his posts which (it is claimed) led to his being traced.

  4. JacktheSmilingBlack
    Posted June 18, 2009 at 1:27 am | Permalink

    Reside beyond HMG jurisdiction. An Internet cafe in downtown Vientiane looks promising. “I say, does anybody here speak English?”
    Problem is, to have a whistle worth blowing; you have to be where the action/corruption is. That said, time spent in research is never time wasted, as the truth is almost always out there on the Web.
    But bottom line, Authority has been wrong footed and out flanked by the spare-bedroom blogger and mobile phone camera operative. So assume YouTube will be in the frame for “terminate with extreme prejudice”.

  5. Hibbo
    Posted June 18, 2009 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    This is absolutely brilliant advice, thank you so much. I mean, surely no-one wishing to blog anonymously would have thought of such revolutionary ideas as to use a pseudonym or not include details that might give you away.

    I hope the oppressed of the world may read your technological and cutting edge tips.

    A triumph!

  6. Posted June 22, 2009 at 8:49 am | Permalink

    Hibbo, why resort to unnecessary sarcasm? You may be the world’s expert on anonymous blogging, but many people – myself included – aren’t aware of all the ways to try to avoid being identified.

    Paul, thanks for the useful links. Nightjack’s identification has extensive ramifications for anyone who blogs, and it’s helpful to know what mechanisms are out there to aid anonymity.

  7. RadioElectric
    Posted June 22, 2009 at 8:24 pm | Permalink

    Actually, I’d advise against using that online pen name generator if anonymity is what you want. Or at least if you do then don’t put your real name in it to start with! It gives the same name back for your input each time, so somebody taking a guess at your real name could use that to confirm it.

  8. Posted June 23, 2009 at 9:30 am | Permalink

    Thanks – have changed the link to another one that’s more anonymous. Have also amended the guidance slightly to address Hibbo’s sarcasm…

10 Trackbacks

  1. [...] UPDATE 4: I’ve written a guide to anonymity for bloggers. [...]

  2. [...] if they do not – there will be people and materials on-line supporting anonymous [...]

  3. [...] manieren om anoniem te bloggen (Eng) http://ur1.ca/5vd0 Anoniem aanmelden, anonieme website en blijf [...]

  4. [...] Full post at this link… [...]

  5. By Footprints (19.06.09) | Chris Deary on June 21, 2009 at 1:11 am

    [...] 7 ways to blog anonymously [...]

  6. By 15 minutes of anonymity « Hanneke du Toit on June 25, 2009 at 10:54 am

    [...] you be worried, here are 7 ways to blog anonymously. The best bit of advice is to simply try not to win big literary [...]

  7. By The logic-free zone » Anonimiteit on June 27, 2009 at 7:40 am

    [...] wilt bloggen dat niet aardig is en je wilt toch (enigszins) anoniem blijven, dan zijn er wel wat technische truuks te bedenken. Maar je moet er ook rekening mee houden dat als het puntje bij het paaltje komt, dat [...]

  8. [...] Blogging: Want to keep your identity separate or anonymous when blogging? Paul Bradshaw has a list of the best tools and tips for maintaining anonymity online. Tipster: Laura Oliver. To submit a tip to Journalism.co.uk, use this link – we will pay a fiver [...]

  9. [...] month I said in my post ‘7 ways to blog anonymously‘ that I was trying to find out how anonymous blogging platform Blogacause.com ensured [...]

  10. By The end of anonymity? – Lex Ferenda on January 6, 2010 at 10:21 pm

    [...] I do disagree with the aspects of the decision that take NightJack’s role as a police officer into account, in terms of discipline and so forth – although unnecessary, I don’t think they were appropriate to an examination of a privacy claim of this nature. To protect the rights of the whistleblower, there needs to be a more subtle examination. (There is also the non-legal approach to the protection of anonymity: outlined in admirable clarity and with a dash of humour at the Online Journalism Blog) [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting