Monthly Archives: November 2006

Sun and NOW launch readers’ mobile service

[Keyword: , , , ]. Press Gazette reports:

“The Sun and News of the World have both launched new services allowing readers to send in stories, pictures and video for publication via mobile phone text message.

“News of the World online editor Bill Akass said: “We make no bones about paying good money for good content. Now we’re just making it easier for our readers to send us their content in either pictures or tips format, and we’ll pay them for the material we publish.”

Save this story on del.icio.us / Digg this story

More on video: it’s the ads wot done it

[Keyword: , , , ]. The recent issue of The Journalist contains a small news item which sheds more light on the trend for newspapers to focus on online video:

“The plans for multi-media publishing are based on attracting multi-media advertising, the group’s “new media” director Annelies van den Belt told the Association of Online Publishers conference in October.

“”The consumer now has a much more multi-media approach,” she said. “It’s about following that consumer [with advertising] and touchpoints are becoming incredibly important. We have come up with 32 products that we can match touchpoints to during the day.”

It seems that, just as the growth of online advertising was the motivation behind Rupert Murdoch’s landmark speech, so it is now pushing online news towards video. What a shame.

Save this story on del.icio.us / Digg this story

Five reasons why newspaper blogs exist

[Keyword: , , , ]. The Telegraph’s Shane Richmond gives a response to Andrew Grant-Adamson’s analysis of newspaper blogs (What is the purpose of newspaper blogs?). He identifies five key reasons for creating newspaper blogs:

  1. Niche publishing
  2. Unlimited space
  3. Experimentation
  4. Interactivity
  5. Personality

Or, to quote at length:


“First of all, blogs are niche offerings. Everything in the print edition of the paper has to work for as many people as possible but that isn’t the case with blogs.
“[… S]pace is the second point. It’s not that these posts aren’t good enough for the paper, it’s that they won’t fit in the paper. There is only so much space in the print edition each day and competition is strong. The blogs give us an opportunity to focus on stories that the paper hasn’t been able to cover, or to look at an angle on a story that there wasn’t space to develop in print.
“Then there’s stuff that the paper would never attempt. For example, for his recent article about music recommendation software The Filter, David Derbyshire spoke to musician Peter Gabriel. The transcript of his interview ran to around 2,000 words but, as is often the case with news stories, only a handful of quotes from the interview made it into print. In the old world the interview would just disappear but, since he has a blog, David put the full transcript on there.
“Likewise, after Christopher Howse wrote an article for the newspaper about comedian Sacha Baron Cohen’s Borat film, he followed-up with a blog post which considered one aspect of the story, anti-semitism, in more detail. The post was the most-read post on the blog site last week.
“That brings me to the third point: experimentation. The blogs allow journalists to try things that are a little different from what they normally do and we can experiment technically as well. The blogs were the first part of the site to offer the option to post articles to social news and social bookmarking sites, a feature that has since been added to all of Telegraph.co.uk.
“[…] The blogs really are a conversation, with readers and with other blogs. This post is an example of the latter.
“And therein lies point four: interactivity. The blogs are steered to a great extent by their readers. Our best bloggers have all, at some point, allowed the readers to dictate what they write about. Of course, the paper is shaped by its readers too but with blogs the connection is more immediate and more personal.
“[…] my fifth point: personality. In a recent post I said that it is important to turn more journalists into ‘personalities’. Blogging is the ideal way to do this. In a world that is more fragmented, where reader loyalty is harder to maintain, a journalist who is a personality can be a very valuable figure.”

UPDATE: Shane has posted a follow-up post with reactions from his fellow Telegraph bloggers.

Save this story on del.icio.us / Digg this story

Review: Online News

[Keyword: , , , ]. This review will be appearing in a forthcoming issue of the journal Journalism.

online news cover In 2004 American technology journalist and publisher Dan Gillmor published We The Media, a book that described how journalism in the new media age was changing from a ‘lecture’ to a ‘conversation’. It quickly became the bible of online journalism, while Gillmor was heralded as a guru on citizen journalism in particular.

With Online News Stuart Allan has produced a book of comparable importance, but from a much-needed British – or at least transatlantic – perspective.

The concept is straightforward: an overview of online journalism in its different forms, with a historical perspective focusing on key events. The execution is clear, critical, and thoroughly researched, and even much-repeated stories – such as the ‘Rathergate’ or ‘Memogate’ affair that led to Dan Rather’s resignation – are illuminated with fresh detail.

Allan identifies two key ‘tipping points’ in the development of online news: the tsunami in South East Asia and the importance that that gave to citizen journalism – and the speech by Rupert Murdoch which finally acknowledged the need for newspapers to embrace the web – or be buried by it.

From there he explores a number of other ‘tipping points’: how September 11th “redefined” news when mainstream agencies crashed under excessive demand, and smaller sites took up the strain; how the Iraq war created a demand from readers for alternative voices from abroad; how participatory journalism is creating opportunities for news outside of commercial pressures; and how bloggers have become both news source and news watchdog.

What is laudable here is the rigour with which Allan approaches his subject matter, and his avoidance of the hype that characterises so much writing on online news. While the importance of blogs are acknowledged, for instance, the potential for descent into ‘mob rule mentality’ is outlined – for instance, in the way in which rightwing bloggers targeted what they perceived as the ‘liberal’ CBS and CNN. Likewise, while bloggers can be seen as ‘democratising’ journalism, Allan points out that there is an emerging hierarchy of “celebrity bloggers” that dominate that conversation; and that “bloggers who actively resist pressures to conform – that is, who continues to strive to speak truth to power – will find it that much more difficult to reach a broad audience”.

In his final chapter Allan notes the importance of Google News and its ‘computer editors’ for the future of journalism and news distribution, while also identifying how “notions of ‘authority’, ‘credibility’ and ‘prestige’ are in flux”. The BBC is held up as an example of the genuinely empowering possibilities of new journalism technologies – particularly the organisation’s moves to make both software and archive content available to users – but ultimately “too often the pressures of the marketplace being brought to bear on online news are working to narrow the spectrum of possible viewpoints to those which advertisers are inclined to support”.

Summing up, Allan identifies a worrying trend in online news becoming “aligned with the ‘attractive wrapping’ of commercial television”, a trend which has most recently been reinforced by The Times, Telegraph, Guardian, Sun and Trinity Mirror all making moves towards producing online video. If the promises of online news are to be fulfilled books like this deserve the widest possible readership.
Save this story on del.icio.us / Digg this story

Review: Online News (Allan)

This review is republished from the version on the Blogger-hosted predecessor of this site 

In 2004 American technology journalist and publisher Dan Gillmor published We The Media, a book that described how journalism in the new media age was changing from a `lecture’ to a `conversation’. It quickly became the bible of online journalism, while Gillmor was heralded as a guru on citizen journalism in particular.

With Online News Stuart Allan has produced a book of comparable importance, but from a much-needed British – or at least transatlantic – perspective.

The concept is straightforward: an overview of online journalism in its different forms, with a historical perspective focusing on key events. The execution is clear, critical, and thoroughly researched, and even much-repeated stories – such as the `Rathergate’ or `Memogate’ affair that led to Dan Rather’s resignation – are illuminated with fresh detail.

Allan identifies two key `tipping points’ in the development of online news: the tsunami in South East Asia and the importance that that gave to citizen journalism – and the speech by Rupert Murdoch which finally acknowledged the need for newspapers to embrace the web – or be buried by it.

From there he explores a number of other `tipping points’: how September 11th “redefined” news when mainstream agencies crashed under excessive demand, and smaller sites took up the strain; how the Iraq war created a demand from readers for alternative voices from abroad; how participatory journalism is creating opportunities for news outside of commercial pressures; and how bloggers have become both news source and news watchdog.

What is laudable here is the rigour with which Allan approaches his subject matter, and his avoidance of the hype that characterises so much writing on online news. While the importance of blogs are acknowledged, for instance, the potential for descent into `mob rule mentality’ is outlined – for instance, in the way in which rightwing bloggers targeted what they perceived as the `liberal’ CBS and CNN. Likewise, while bloggers can be seen as `democratising’ journalism, Allan points out that there is an emerging hierarchy of “celebrity bloggers” that dominate that conversation; and that “bloggers who actively resist pressures to conform – that is, who continues to strive to speak truth to power – will find it that much more difficult to reach a broad audience”.

In his final chapter Allan notes the importance of Google News and its `computer editors’ for the future of journalism and news distribution, while also identifying how “notions of `authority’, `credibility’ and `prestige’ are in flux”. The BBC is held up as an example of the genuinely empowering possibilities of new journalism technologies – particularly the organisation’s moves to make both software and archive content available to users – but ultimately “too often the pressures of the marketplace being brought to bear on online news are working to narrow the spectrum of possible viewpoints to those which advertisers are inclined to support”.

Summing up, Allan identifies a worrying trend in online news becoming “aligned with the `attractive wrapping’ of commercial television”, a trend which has most recently been reinforced by The Times, Telegraph, Guardian, Sun and Trinity Mirror all making moves towards producing online video. If the promises of online news are to be fulfilled books like this deserve the widest possible readership.

‘Censorship and bias’ tracked by news tool

[Keyword: , , , ]. Reasons to love new media #354: Journalism.co.uk reports on NewsSniffer, a web mashup that

“monitors The Independent, Guardian Unlimited and BBC News throughout the day to check for changes made to published stories. Revisions are stored and highlighted for comparison by users, who are then invited to rank the most intriguing differences.

“The site’s Revisionista tool illustrates the evolution of articles, including corrections to spelling and grammar mistakes. Its Watch Your Mouth feature stores comments “censored” after publication in BBC News’ ‘Have Your Say’ threads.

“”We’re looking for systemic bias,” Leeds-based software developer John Leach, the man behind the site, told Journalism.co.uk. “I’m of the belief that the corporate media has a pro-corporate agenda so I expect to find bias towards this.”

Save this story on del.icio.us / Digg this story