Reasons not to ignore comments #2: The Daily Mail and Julie Moult

UPDATE: A response from the Daily Mail’s Martin Clarke: “comments on the article in question were not published, because the story was already a few days old … If you want to complain about a story some days after it’s published you have to take a more traditional view of things and write to the editor”

I’ve blogged before about the problem with ignoring comments. But recently “marketing man gone native” blog Bloggerheads has been providing a rather stronger case.

Julie Moult is a journalist who wrote a particularly poorly informed non-story for the Daily Mail about UK MP Hazel Blears being Googlebombed (in short, Blears wasn’t Googlebombed at all: the top result for her name just happened to be a humorous image).

The Bloggerheads blogger (‘Manic’), frustrated by its inaccuracies, posted a comment on the story correcting it. Because that’s what comments are for, right?

Apparently not.

The comment was not published. So Manic took things up a notch.

He posted a lengthy – and search engine optimised – blog entry – Julie Moult is an idiot – to demonstrate his points:

“I think with a quiet word to my readers and a few other web users, I could easily have the entire front page for ‘julie moult’ in Google Images filled with images telling the world that Julie Moult is an idiot… and if she thinks really, really hard about it, she might just begin to understand that what enables/powers the eventual result isn’t magic or trickery, but instead Google detecting a genuine public response to my appeal and her own damn articles”

Just over an hour after publishing, his post was the top result on Google for the search ‘Julie Moult’. Now, as predicted, the whole page of results is also filled with similar entries.

Yesterday he published an update taking things up another notch – this time targeting the Daily Mail itself.

The problem? Despite the fact that “tens of thousands” of readers had seen Manic’s post (including “people at 36 different workstations at Associated Newspapers,”) the article has not been updated – and not a single comment has been published.

“After thousands and thousands of visitors that have dropped by knowing that there is something wrong with this article, not one comment has been published about it and not one change has been made.

“And if that’s not bad enough, The Daily Mail then go on to lie about it:

“”No comments have so far been submitted”…?

“What a pack of lying bastards.”

He’s now inviting readers to help document “the lies and falsehoods of the Daily Mail (focusing on a subject, speciality or columnist of your choosing)” and get Daily Mail Watch to the top of the Google search for Daily Mail.

They’re hitting the Daily Mail where it hurts – on search engines – and who can blame them? It is incredibly frustrating for any reader to put the effort into posting a useful comment on a news website only to see it disappear into oblivion. I know – it happened to me when I also published a comment correcting a Daily Mail article last February (worse, Martin Belam’s comment was edited to remove criticism*).

The lesson behind all this is best left to Manic himself:

“Just so you’re aware that your notoriously self-serving comment moderation policy does have its hidden costs; normally you lot wouldn’t be worth the time and effort, but your ignoring/deleting my quite reasonable comment response to your article annoyed me just long enough for this idea to take shape. There, now aren’t you glad that you censored a polite comment pointing out an obvious flaw?”

*UPDATE: It seems Belam’s full comment was eventually reinstated, lower down the comments and with a timestamp the day after Belam blogged about it.


11 thoughts on “Reasons not to ignore comments #2: The Daily Mail and Julie Moult

  1. egrommet

    The Mail is still at it then. A colleague and I posted comments on a really off Mail story ages ago – we went back several times and the didn’t make it past the moderator. I should have known using the words liberal and moderate would have hit their spam filter!
    Do they actually have a moderator or is it just they forgot to turn off the comment function.
    Get with the programme Daily Mail.

  2. Pingback: Writing Hurts | Don’t forget, comments work both ways

  3. Pingback: 1000 things I’ve learned about blogging | Online Journalism Blog

  4. Pingback: Nachrichtenfluss » Blog Archive » 1000 Dinge die ich über das Bloggen gelernt habe

  5. Pingback: Podnosh Blog » Archive » The Daily Mail appears to find comments irritating

  6. Pingback: Online communities: Background resources « Sarah Hartley

  7. Marta from herbs for menopause

    I agree, that this situation us really awful, if the author, wants to know other people’s opinion he should post comments, even if they are criticize his article or correct it. And of moderator post only positive comments, I think it is not fair to other readers.

  8. Pingback: Facebook, Dunblane and a 2 page apology from the Express - a lesson in online journalism ethics | Online Journalism Blog

  9. Steve Jackson

    This reminds me of North East local papers the Shields Gazette – I’d occasionally post a slightly argumentative comment and it never made it past moderation.

    Then I tried a less argumentative point of view – still nothing.

    Then I just wrote glowingly about the SG – and still nothing.

    Like the other commenter said – I reckoned they just didn’t turn it on – or couldn’t be bothered to moderate a growing backlog of comments.

  10. Ben

    DailyMail censors comments … then lies about when asked. They like to use some hogwash about how many comments they get and how few “moderators” they have. This is nothing more than a cover story. Daily Mail blatently and tastelessly censors comments. There is no such thing as free speech when it comes to the Daily Mail. They are little more than a crude, politically motivated, tabloid rag. Believe NOTHING that is found on Daily Mail. Daily Mail is a fraud.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.