The Chinese earthquake and Twitter – crowdsourcing without managers

There’s been an earthquake in China, and the Twittersphere is alive with it. I’m going to write a post on this and keep adding to it through the next hour or so. Let me know anything interesting you’ve spotted @paulbradshaw

The first interesting point is Tweetburner: its most-clicked links shared on Twitter are almost entirely about the earthquake, and show some interesting uses:

China Earthquake tweets on Tweetburner

  1. A Google map of the earthquake location
  2. A BBC blog post about Twitter coverage of the earthquake
  3. A Twitter user’s tweet about experiencing the earthquake (in Shanghai)
  4. A Google translation from Chinese to English of tweets from Twitterlocal
  5. The Earthquake Center’s page on the earthquake
  6. CNN’s report
  7. A picture which appears to be capturing the earthquake in an office
  8. A Summize search for ‘earthquake’

Here is crowdsourcing without the editorial management. How quickly otherwise would a journalist have thought of using Twitterlocal with a Google translation? And how soon before someone improves it so it only pulls tweets with the word ‘earthquake’, or more specific to the region affected? (It also emphasises the need for newspapers and broadcasters to have programmers on the team who could do this quickly)

How quickly would a journalist have found someone who speaks English and was affected by the quake? Or an image? (Of course, this needs verifying, but sourcing has already begun)

AlphaTwitter shows some of the same results but also included a video of someone experiencing tremors 950 miles away in Beijing, a Chinese language report (including that picture mentioned above) and an English language Chinese media report. Tweetmeme showed the same links as Tweetburner.

Twitt(url)y and Hashtags, meanwhile, both appeared to be down. And Intwition picked the worst possible time to pause their service for changes.

Twitter coverage of the earthquake

Robert Scoble was following proceedings on his much-followed Twitter, and feeding back information from his followers, including, for instance (after he tweeted the fact that Tweetscan was struggling) that people were saying Summize was the best tool to use.

If you followed the conversation through Scoble using Quotably, you could then find Gregg Scott, who in turn was talking to RedChina, Karoli, mmsullivan, and inwalkedbud who was in Chengdu, China (also there was Casperodj and Lyrrael).

If you wanted to check out inwalkedbud you could do so using Tweetstats and find he has been twittering since December. Sadly the Internet Archive doesn’t bring any results, though.

The mainstream media had differing reports: RTE (Ireland) said “No major damage after China earthquake” – but UK’s Sky News reported four children killed and over 100 injured; Chinaview (China) said no buildings had collapsed – but an Australian newspaper said they had.

Interestingly, Chinaview was slow loading, presumably because of excessive demand from users – another reason Twitter, with its 140 character minimalism, should in theory prove more useful during a major news event. I say in theory because Twitter is not as reliable as it should be.

World Wide Help, a blog set up following the Asian tsunami, started liveblogging it.

And perhaps the best coverage came from Shanghaiist, which also liveblogged it, including an image, links to twitter tweets, radio reports, Google Maps and video (many of these the same as listed above – it’s hard to tell whether they got their links from Twitter or vice versa).

Interestingly, their latest update as I type is UPDATE 30, 5:32pm: Not confirmed, but from reliable source: “Propaganda dept has banned news outlets from sending own teams. All stories have to be from Xinhua.” Anyone have more details?

From The Frontline recorded how they had used Twitter to follow events, and concluded the time for debate on the usefulness of Twitter is over. Well, of course.

It also brings up debates about the role of journalists in a networked age – given that I could follow the story (conversation) from an office in Birmingham UK, but mainly because I knew the right tools to do so, how does that affect the journalist’s role? I’d answer that firstly they need to know the tools (including those of verification), and secondly they need to be in the conversations already. What’s your excuse?

UPDATE: In another demonstration of the importance of being in the conversation, this blog post was linked to by Robert Scoble, generating a pingback (notification of a link), which made me read his blog post, which then led me to Global Voices Online’s links to videos and other Twitter and blog reports (this is why journalists should be blogging). They link to a non-English summize search for, presumably, ‘earthquake’. Another key point:

Many are writing of difficulties connecting to those at the center of the quake zone over telephone, but the internet seems to still be functioning. Beijing-based tech guru Kaiser Kuo writes that the government Earthquake Bureau website is currently inaccessible, presumably from high levels of traffic.”

UPDATE: Mathew Ingram adds:

“People can post messages about whatever they wish, rather than answering only the questions that a producer asks them, and they can add links to blog posts, photos, maps and video. In the study I wrote about recently that looked at Twitter and Facebook and Wikipedia as disaster reporting tools, one of the comments about the California fires was that the media focused on celebrities and how they were affected, but Twitter and other sources gave a more complete version of events and how they were affecting everyone.”

From Better Living Through Software:

“It’s silly in the extreme to act like twitter is somehow breaking news, though. Masses of people within China found out about the earthquake as it was happening via messages from friends on QQ (which is massively more popular than twitter), and CCTV carried the news almost instantly. I suppose it’s cute that some English-speaking expats using echo-chamber technology were able to *also* report the event on twitter, but even the tweetscan example seems a bit lame to me. When I search for tweets with the word “地震”, tweetscan gives me nothing — apparently tweetscan doesn’t care about Chinese. Perhaps this explains why Scoble and BBC are reporting only English tweets from China.”

UPDATE: Two more blog posts worth reading for their balanced effect. Firstly, the Daily Kos has a post that gives an overview of online coverage in both English and Chinese, including a link to the QQ Earthquake video page. Digital Watch talks of the hubris of those hyping the role of Twitter in coverage:

“Twitter’s immediacy was nice, but by no means unique. The whole time I was twittering, my wife was on her instant messengers, with both QQ and MSN Live open. She was also monitoring all the portals’ news flashes on the quake. I didn’t feel like I had any more information than she did

“Twitter’s public nature was of some real value both for ordinary folk and for professional journalists, who were able to quickly identify English-speakers on the scene who could be interviewed. The broadcast nature of Twitter, while it can bore one to tears when used to gratuitously announce one’s pedestrian comings and goings, was in this case something that made it better than simple IM.

“The other dimension to Twitter that proved very useful in this case was its global usership: there were lots of Chinese messages I was following, and I was among many people bilingual individuals translating more useful, insightful, or interesting tweets from Chinese into English. Call it “bridge microblogging.””

74 comments

  1. Pingback: Scobleizer — Tech geek blogger » Blog Archive Quake in China «
  2. Pingback: Smart Mobs » Blog Archive » China earthquake
  3. Pingback: odd time signatures » Blog Archive » BREAKING - China Earthquake - 7.8 Magnitude
  4. Pingback: Twitter and the Chinese Earthquake « c o n v e r g e d // m e d i a
  5. Pingback: rexblog.com: Rex Hammock’s weblog » Blog Archive » Twitter - a first-repsponder medium
  6. Pingback: Twitter e o terramoto na China : Ponto Media
  7. Pingback: links for 2008-05-12 « Mediating Conflict
  8. Pingback: Sandra puffar… 20080512 · Mindpark
  9. Pingback: Twitter: The first draft of history? » mathewingram.com/work |
  10. Pingback: Earthquake in China « What is news to me
  11. Pingback: depois do tremor, o que esperar da china? « Monitorando
  12. Pingback:   Following Chinese Earthquake via Social Media — contentious.com
  13. Pingback: humanitarian.info » It rains, it pours, it twitters
  14. Pingback: El blog de Martín Arnedo » Blog Archive » China tembló primero en Twitter
  15. Pingback:   links for 2008-05-12 by andydickinson.net
  16. Pingback: Vancouver International Digital Festival — Twitter breaks Chinese earthquake news — May 21 — 24, 2008
  17. Pingback: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media » Monday squibs
  18. Andy T

    “crowdsourcing without managers”
    I don’t think that it is an issue. The news story should be judge by yourself, find out by yourself.
    “crowdsourcing without managers” is better that directed stories and official stories.

  19. Pingback: Conversations with Dina » It takes disasters …
  20. Pingback: Twitter ble jordskjelvkanal nr. 1 : Pål Hivand | blog
  21. Pingback: O Twitter é o primeiro esboço | Twitter is the first draft « O Lago | The Lake
  22. Pingback: Is Twitter really that important? « The Drink Tank Blog
  23. Pingback: El terremoto en China, vía Twitter — laslo rojas
  24. Pingback: Entrevista sobre o Twitter « O Lago | The Lake
  25. Pingback: FreieNetze.de » Links für den 15.05.2008
  26. Pingback: Chicago Public Radio Blog » Citizen journalism covering China and Myanmar | News and Notes from WBEZ
  27. Pingback: iheni :: making the web worldwide » Blog Archive » Twitter + Mobiles = Accessible news from inaccessible places
  28. アメリカ留学

    Hi! I am a Japanese. Though I looked for English study in various ways, I commented because contents were interesting. I was able to enjoy it very much. In addition, I come to look. Please keep it for us. Thank you!

  29. Shawn

    By now, you know that an earthquake of catastrophic proportion hit China’s southwestern Sichuan province a few weeks ago. But did you know that four of China’s most cherished World Heritage sites were affected, too? One very important site is the Sichuan Giant Panda Sanctuaries, home to 30% of the world’s remaining endangered giant pandas.

    Aid teams working in the area need help to be most effective in their efforts to save the pandas and restore access to the sites. Check out the online campaign that Friends of World Heritage, a grassroots initiative created by the United Nations Foundation with Expedia, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) and UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre, has created to raise awareness and funds to help.

    To learn more, visit https://secure.globalproblems-globalsolutions.org/site/Donation2?idb=922467088&df_id=1160&1160.donation=form1&JServSessionIdr006=rxcaaac41f.app5b

  30. Pingback: O Twitter como Ferramenta de Estudos de Mercado « Dissonância Cognitiva
  31. Pingback: Twitter Faster to Report News than All Other Media
  32. Pingback: Endless Conversation: The Unfolding Saga of Blogs, Twitter, Friendfeed, and Social Sites « Think Cow
  33. Pingback: Twitter and China Earthquake : Tech At Hand dot Net | Philippine, Blogging, SEO & Tips
  34. Pingback: Endless Conversation: The Unfolding Saga of Blogs, Twitter, Friendfeed, and Social Sites | Trinitude Network
  35. Pingback: 1000 things I’ve learned about blogging | Online Journalism Blog
  36. Pingback: Nachrichtenfluss » Blog Archive » 1000 Dinge die ich über das Bloggen gelernt habe
  37. Pingback: BASIC Principles of Online Journalism: C is for Community & Conversation (pt2: Conversation) | Online Journalism Blog
  38. Pingback: Links a seguir | Links to follow « O Lago | The Lake
  39. Pingback: Endless Conversation: The Unfolding Saga of Blogs, Twitter, Friendfeed, and Social Sites | Blogging | Blogging For Business | Web News | Make Money Blogging |
  40. Pingback: Review: The Blogging Revolution by Antony Loewenstein | Online Journalism Blog
  41. Pingback: Are these the biggest moments in journalism-blogging history? | Online Journalism Blog
  42. Pingback: Yes, Twitter is a source of journalism — mathewingram.com/work
  43. Pingback: Twitter Is A Breaking News Source | Domain Name News | Domain News | Expired Domains
  44. Pingback: War, assassination, and Strictly Come Dancing: What news did you first hear on Twitter? | Online Journalism Blog
  45. Pingback: Starting a blog? 12 ideas for blog posts | Online Journalism Blog
  46. Pingback: Panic {RE}_Programming » Blog Archive » In Hudson River Landing, PR Pros Were Not First Responders
  47. ride on mower

    Here is crowdsourcing without the editorial management. How quickly otherwise would a journalist have thought of using Twitterlocal with a Google translation? And how soon before someone improves it so it only pulls tweets with the word ‘earthquake’, or more specific to the region affected? (It also emphasises the need for newspapers and broadcasters to have programmers on the team who could do this quickly) Thanks folks.

  48. Pingback: Data Flows and Crises in Online Reputation Economies - Caseorganic
  49. Ride on mowers

    The fact is that Twitter became lately a source for real time data, remember that guy that called the police by using Twitter instead of calling 911? That guy is one optimist dude. However, I don’t think it will go further that this, I mean Ok with the news as long as you trust the internet as a reliable source of data, but not more…

  50. Pingback: Interesting ideas about blogging | Ismail Mechbal Portfolio
  51. Pingback: When will we stop saying “Pictures from Twitter” and “Video from YouTube”? | Online Journalism Blog
  52. Pingback: Metareporter » Twitter versus de Telegraaf: de rol van vrijheid in nieuwe en traditionele nieuwsgaring
  53. Pingback: Using real-time news tools | Richard Hartley
  54. Lucinda

    Do you mind if I quote a couple of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your website? My blog is in the very same area of interest as yours and my users would definitely benefit from some of the information you provide here. Please let me know if this alright with you. Thanks a lot!

Post a comment

You may use the following HTML:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>