The Chinese earthquake and Twitter – crowdsourcing without managers

There’s been an earthquake in China, and the Twittersphere is alive with it. I’m going to write a post on this and keep adding to it through the next hour or so. Let me know anything interesting you’ve spotted @paulbradshaw

The first interesting point is Tweetburner: its most-clicked links shared on Twitter are almost entirely about the earthquake, and show some interesting uses:

China Earthquake tweets on Tweetburner

  1. A Google map of the earthquake location
  2. A BBC blog post about Twitter coverage of the earthquake
  3. A Twitter user’s tweet about experiencing the earthquake (in Shanghai)
  4. A Google translation from Chinese to English of tweets from Twitterlocal
  5. The Earthquake Center’s page on the earthquake
  6. CNN’s report
  7. A picture which appears to be capturing the earthquake in an office
  8. A Summize search for ‘earthquake’

Here is crowdsourcing without the editorial management. How quickly otherwise would a journalist have thought of using Twitterlocal with a Google translation? And how soon before someone improves it so it only pulls tweets with the word ‘earthquake’, or more specific to the region affected? (It also emphasises the need for newspapers and broadcasters to have programmers on the team who could do this quickly)

How quickly would a journalist have found someone who speaks English and was affected by the quake? Or an image? (Of course, this needs verifying, but sourcing has already begun)

AlphaTwitter shows some of the same results but also included a video of someone experiencing tremors 950 miles away in Beijing, a Chinese language report (including that picture mentioned above) and an English language Chinese media report. Tweetmeme showed the same links as Tweetburner.

Twitt(url)y and Hashtags, meanwhile, both appeared to be down. And Intwition picked the worst possible time to pause their service for changes.

Twitter coverage of the earthquake

Robert Scoble was following proceedings on his much-followed Twitter, and feeding back information from his followers, including, for instance (after he tweeted the fact that Tweetscan was struggling) that people were saying Summize was the best tool to use.

If you followed the conversation through Scoble using Quotably, you could then find Gregg Scott, who in turn was talking to RedChina, Karoli, mmsullivan, and inwalkedbud who was in Chengdu, China (also there was Casperodj and Lyrrael).

If you wanted to check out inwalkedbud you could do so using Tweetstats and find he has been twittering since December. Sadly the Internet Archive doesn’t bring any results, though.

The mainstream media had differing reports: RTE (Ireland) said “No major damage after China earthquake” – but UK’s Sky News reported four children killed and over 100 injured; Chinaview (China) said no buildings had collapsed – but an Australian newspaper said they had.

Interestingly, Chinaview was slow loading, presumably because of excessive demand from users – another reason Twitter, with its 140 character minimalism, should in theory prove more useful during a major news event. I say in theory because Twitter is not as reliable as it should be.

World Wide Help, a blog set up following the Asian tsunami, started liveblogging it.

And perhaps the best coverage came from Shanghaiist, which also liveblogged it, including an image, links to twitter tweets, radio reports, Google Maps and video (many of these the same as listed above – it’s hard to tell whether they got their links from Twitter or vice versa).

Interestingly, their latest update as I type is UPDATE 30, 5:32pm: Not confirmed, but from reliable source: “Propaganda dept has banned news outlets from sending own teams. All stories have to be from Xinhua.” Anyone have more details?

From The Frontline recorded how they had used Twitter to follow events, and concluded the time for debate on the usefulness of Twitter is over. Well, of course.

It also brings up debates about the role of journalists in a networked age – given that I could follow the story (conversation) from an office in Birmingham UK, but mainly because I knew the right tools to do so, how does that affect the journalist’s role? I’d answer that firstly they need to know the tools (including those of verification), and secondly they need to be in the conversations already. What’s your excuse?

UPDATE: In another demonstration of the importance of being in the conversation, this blog post was linked to by Robert Scoble, generating a pingback (notification of a link), which made me read his blog post, which then led me to Global Voices Online’s links to videos and other Twitter and blog reports (this is why journalists should be blogging). They link to a non-English summize search for, presumably, ‘earthquake’. Another key point:

Many are writing of difficulties connecting to those at the center of the quake zone over telephone, but the internet seems to still be functioning. Beijing-based tech guru Kaiser Kuo writes that the government Earthquake Bureau website is currently inaccessible, presumably from high levels of traffic.”

UPDATE: Mathew Ingram adds:

“People can post messages about whatever they wish, rather than answering only the questions that a producer asks them, and they can add links to blog posts, photos, maps and video. In the study I wrote about recently that looked at Twitter and Facebook and Wikipedia as disaster reporting tools, one of the comments about the California fires was that the media focused on celebrities and how they were affected, but Twitter and other sources gave a more complete version of events and how they were affecting everyone.”

From Better Living Through Software:

“It’s silly in the extreme to act like twitter is somehow breaking news, though. Masses of people within China found out about the earthquake as it was happening via messages from friends on QQ (which is massively more popular than twitter), and CCTV carried the news almost instantly. I suppose it’s cute that some English-speaking expats using echo-chamber technology were able to *also* report the event on twitter, but even the tweetscan example seems a bit lame to me. When I search for tweets with the word “地震”, tweetscan gives me nothing — apparently tweetscan doesn’t care about Chinese. Perhaps this explains why Scoble and BBC are reporting only English tweets from China.”

UPDATE: Two more blog posts worth reading for their balanced effect. Firstly, the Daily Kos has a post that gives an overview of online coverage in both English and Chinese, including a link to the QQ Earthquake video page. Digital Watch talks of the hubris of those hyping the role of Twitter in coverage:

“Twitter’s immediacy was nice, but by no means unique. The whole time I was twittering, my wife was on her instant messengers, with both QQ and MSN Live open. She was also monitoring all the portals’ news flashes on the quake. I didn’t feel like I had any more information than she did

“Twitter’s public nature was of some real value both for ordinary folk and for professional journalists, who were able to quickly identify English-speakers on the scene who could be interviewed. The broadcast nature of Twitter, while it can bore one to tears when used to gratuitously announce one’s pedestrian comings and goings, was in this case something that made it better than simple IM.

“The other dimension to Twitter that proved very useful in this case was its global usership: there were lots of Chinese messages I was following, and I was among many people bilingual individuals translating more useful, insightful, or interesting tweets from Chinese into English. Call it “bridge microblogging.””

About these ads

84 thoughts on “The Chinese earthquake and Twitter – crowdsourcing without managers

  1. Pingback: Scobleizer — Tech geek blogger » Blog Archive Quake in China «

  2. Pingback: Smart Mobs » Blog Archive » China earthquake

  3. Pingback: odd time signatures » Blog Archive » BREAKING - China Earthquake - 7.8 Magnitude

  4. Pingback: Twitter and the Chinese Earthquake « c o n v e r g e d // m e d i a

  5. Pingback: rexblog.com: Rex Hammock’s weblog » Blog Archive » Twitter - a first-repsponder medium

  6. Pingback: Twitter e o terramoto na China : Ponto Media

  7. Pingback: links for 2008-05-12 « Mediating Conflict

  8. Pingback: Sandra puffar… 20080512 · Mindpark

  9. Pingback: Twitter: The first draft of history? » mathewingram.com/work |

  10. Pingback: Earthquake in China « What is news to me

  11. Pingback: depois do tremor, o que esperar da china? « Monitorando

  12. Pingback:   Following Chinese Earthquake via Social Media — contentious.com

  13. paulbradshaw Post author

    @Ien (comment 9): the USGS webpage was no.3 on the top ten links being shared on twitter (5 on my numbered list), so yes, that stuff showed up.

    Reply
  14. Pingback: humanitarian.info » It rains, it pours, it twitters

  15. Pingback: El blog de Martín Arnedo » Blog Archive » China tembló primero en Twitter

  16. Pingback:   links for 2008-05-12 by andydickinson.net

  17. Pingback: Vancouver International Digital Festival — Twitter breaks Chinese earthquake news — May 21 — 24, 2008

  18. Pingback: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media » Monday squibs

  19. Andy T

    “crowdsourcing without managers”
    I don’t think that it is an issue. The news story should be judge by yourself, find out by yourself.
    “crowdsourcing without managers” is better that directed stories and official stories.

    Reply
  20. Pingback: Conversations with Dina » It takes disasters …

  21. Pingback: Twitter ble jordskjelvkanal nr. 1 : Pål Hivand | blog

  22. Pingback: O Twitter é o primeiro esboço | Twitter is the first draft « O Lago | The Lake

  23. Pingback: Is Twitter really that important? « The Drink Tank Blog

  24. Pingback: El terremoto en China, vía Twitter — laslo rojas

  25. Pingback: Entrevista sobre o Twitter « O Lago | The Lake

  26. Pingback: FreieNetze.de » Links für den 15.05.2008

  27. Pingback: Chicago Public Radio Blog » Citizen journalism covering China and Myanmar | News and Notes from WBEZ

  28. Pingback: iheni :: making the web worldwide » Blog Archive » Twitter + Mobiles = Accessible news from inaccessible places

  29. アメリカ留学

    Hi! I am a Japanese. Though I looked for English study in various ways, I commented because contents were interesting. I was able to enjoy it very much. In addition, I come to look. Please keep it for us. Thank you!

    Reply
  30. Shawn

    By now, you know that an earthquake of catastrophic proportion hit China’s southwestern Sichuan province a few weeks ago. But did you know that four of China’s most cherished World Heritage sites were affected, too? One very important site is the Sichuan Giant Panda Sanctuaries, home to 30% of the world’s remaining endangered giant pandas.

    Aid teams working in the area need help to be most effective in their efforts to save the pandas and restore access to the sites. Check out the online campaign that Friends of World Heritage, a grassroots initiative created by the United Nations Foundation with Expedia, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) and UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre, has created to raise awareness and funds to help.

    To learn more, visit https://secure.globalproblems-globalsolutions.org/site/Donation2?idb=922467088&df_id=1160&1160.donation=form1&JServSessionIdr006=rxcaaac41f.app5b

    Reply
  31. Pingback: O Twitter como Ferramenta de Estudos de Mercado « Dissonância Cognitiva

  32. Pingback: the human network » Blog Archive » Little, Big

  33. Pingback: Twitter Faster to Report News than All Other Media

  34. Pingback: Endless Conversation: The Unfolding Saga of Blogs, Twitter, Friendfeed, and Social Sites « Think Cow

  35. Pingback: Twitter and China Earthquake : Tech At Hand dot Net | Philippine, Blogging, SEO & Tips

  36. Pingback: Endless Conversation: The Unfolding Saga of Blogs, Twitter, Friendfeed, and Social Sites | Trinitude Network

  37. Pingback: 1000 things I’ve learned about blogging | Online Journalism Blog

  38. Pingback: Nachrichtenfluss » Blog Archive » 1000 Dinge die ich über das Bloggen gelernt habe

  39. Pingback: BASIC Principles of Online Journalism: C is for Community & Conversation (pt2: Conversation) | Online Journalism Blog

  40. Pingback: Links a seguir | Links to follow « O Lago | The Lake

  41. Pingback: Endless Conversation: The Unfolding Saga of Blogs, Twitter, Friendfeed, and Social Sites | Blogging | Blogging For Business | Web News | Make Money Blogging |

  42. Pingback: Review: The Blogging Revolution by Antony Loewenstein | Online Journalism Blog

  43. Pingback: Are these the biggest moments in journalism-blogging history? | Online Journalism Blog

  44. Pingback: Yes, Twitter is a source of journalism — mathewingram.com/work

  45. Pingback: Twitter Is A Breaking News Source | Domain Name News | Domain News | Expired Domains

  46. Pingback: War, assassination, and Strictly Come Dancing: What news did you first hear on Twitter? | Online Journalism Blog

  47. Pingback: Starting a blog? 12 ideas for blog posts | Online Journalism Blog

  48. Pingback: Panic {RE}_Programming » Blog Archive » In Hudson River Landing, PR Pros Were Not First Responders

  49. ride on mower

    Here is crowdsourcing without the editorial management. How quickly otherwise would a journalist have thought of using Twitterlocal with a Google translation? And how soon before someone improves it so it only pulls tweets with the word ‘earthquake’, or more specific to the region affected? (It also emphasises the need for newspapers and broadcasters to have programmers on the team who could do this quickly) Thanks folks.

    Reply
  50. Pingback: Data Flows and Crises in Online Reputation Economies - Caseorganic

  51. Pingback: Do You Need a Quake to Change Your Attitude? « Energize Your Attitude - EverythingAttitude

  52. Ride on mowers

    The fact is that Twitter became lately a source for real time data, remember that guy that called the police by using Twitter instead of calling 911? That guy is one optimist dude. However, I don’t think it will go further that this, I mean Ok with the news as long as you trust the internet as a reliable source of data, but not more…

    Reply
  53. Pingback: Interesting ideas about blogging | Ismail Mechbal Portfolio

  54. Pingback: bernetblog.ch » Blog Archiv » Gastblog: Was ist eigentlich… Twitter?

  55. Mammie Layssard

    yo, I don’t examine these kind of posts cos I think the game will be falling off however im sensation this particular therefore i am going to sign up for this website many thanks.

    Reply
  56. Pingback: When will we stop saying “Pictures from Twitter” and “Video from YouTube”? | Online Journalism Blog

  57. Pingback: Metareporter » Twitter versus de Telegraaf: de rol van vrijheid in nieuwe en traditionele nieuwsgaring

  58. Pingback: Using real-time news tools | Richard Hartley

  59. Lucinda

    Do you mind if I quote a couple of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your website? My blog is in the very same area of interest as yours and my users would definitely benefit from some of the information you provide here. Please let me know if this alright with you. Thanks a lot!

    Reply
  60. Alarm Systems Vancouver

    This doesn’t make sense to me since harder jumps are harder to execute well. Also, the captured details of intrusion detection help the personnel to identify the reason and persons involved in the vandalism. Without it, having different versions of the document across the departments is most likely to happen.

    Reply
  61. dekoda.net

    Is certainly Garcinia Cambogia Protected For weight reduction Typically the Spectacular Truth
    does garcinia cambogia work (dekoda.net) Garcinia cambogia extract Alerting Scary Shoppers Instructions garcinia cambogia hca – barmablog.livejournal.com –
    Clean Garcinia cambogia extract HCA The truth dissected Amazing benefits and also Particulars
    garcinia cambogia extract reviews garcinia cambogia
    extract reviews

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s