FAQ: What does blogging add to journalism?

Its been a while since I posted a post answering Frequently Asked Questions. This one comes from a student in Holland, whose thesis revolves around the idea that ‘Blogging adds little to journalism

What’s the difference between blogging and traditional journalism?

I’ve answered this and similar questions in a previous FAQ on journalism vs blogging.

What are the pros and cons of blogging compared to other forms of journalism?

That post and other older FAQs probably give some further answers, but a short answer is: blogging provides an extra space to invite people into your journalism and provide opportunities for them to contribute additional information, suggested avenues of inquiry, etc.

It helps build the relationship between journalist and source in a way that standard formats don’t always provide.

The cons would largely be the extra demands on time – but building relationships with sources is always a trade off between time spent now against time saved later.

Should a blogger be a ‘real’ journalist (education, experience etc.) to be able to call himself/herself a journalistic blogger?

No, in the same way that many journalists don’t have any ‘real’ journalism education or experience. Journalism is defined by the act, not the history of the author.

Does blogging add something to journalism?

Yes, see above and those other FAQs.

What are the advantages for a journalist to have a blog?

See above. Traditional journalism is relatively limited in its formats, whereas blogging allows a wider range of content: you can share more behind-the-scenes insights, raw material such as documents and images, and ongoing updates which are of interest to (and useful for) a more specific audience that newspapers and broadcasts don’t generally aim at.

What is the future of journalistic blogging?

I would say much the same as journalism itself: there’s an increased interest in data, curation, analytics, and video. As we learn what works, we’ll do more of it.

As to your thesis about ‘blogging adds little to journalism’ the best way to test that is to ask journalists what blogging adds to or changes about their work. I did some research into this some years ago, a version of which you can find here – I found it has changed a surprisingly large part of their jobs. And many more journalists blog now than did then.

Advertisements

41 thoughts on “FAQ: What does blogging add to journalism?

  1. Pingback: FAQ: What does blogging add to journalism? | Media36

  2. Pingback: Journalism NOW | Miriah Ludtke

  3. Pingback: Where Does Blogging Fit into Journalism? | The Tracks at Christie Road

  4. Pingback: Uke 6 – Hvordan bør nyhetsredaksjoner utnytte nettmediets potensial best mulig? | Refleksjon

  5. Pingback: 6. UiA-indlæg: Netmediets potentiale for nyhedsredaktioner | Talerör

  6. Pingback: Get Involved. | Reflections from FairyBay.

  7. Pingback: Interior Dreamer

  8. Pingback: Nettjournalistikk: hva bør gjøres? | Kommunikasjon for Meg

  9. Pingback: Bloggoppgave 6 | kakemonster94

  10. Pingback: Borgerjournalistikken | Mr. Blogg Bloggesen

  11. Pingback: Nettmediets potensial | kristojo

  12. Pingback: Nettmediets potensiale | magdalenkauia

  13. Pingback: Hvilket potensiale har nettmediene? | Heidi Elise

  14. Pingback: Nettmediets potensiale | Heidi Elise

  15. Pingback: Nettmediets potensial. | Bloggen

  16. Pingback: Blogginnlegg 6 | littoveralt

  17. Pingback: Making Use of the Potential – Digital Presentation

  18. Pingback: Nettmediets mektige potensial | Janerikus

  19. Pingback: #6 Beste muligheter for nettmediet | Kristin Bygnes

  20. Pingback: Beste muligheter for nettmediet | Kristin Bygnes

  21. Pingback: Det er viktig se på en nettavis som et annet medium enn papiravisen | Malin Christine

  22. Pingback: Hvordan kan nyhetsredaksjoner utnytte nettmediets potensial? | sodafarm

  23. Pingback: Fjortistida, blogging og kyr. | Linn-Elisabeth Halvorsen

  24. Pingback: Bloggoppgave 7: Nettjournalistikk | Gustavs digitale formidling. Om Digital Formidling.

  25. Pingback: 7 – Newsrooms and the potential inherent in the net | KOM 109 - Inés Luján

  26. Pingback: Samspillet – Annes refleksjoner

  27. Pingback: Nyhetene sin fremtid – Mats Winther Maltby

  28. Pingback: Bloggoppgave 7: Utnytter vi internetts muligheter? | Refleksjonsblogg

  29. Pingback: O’store Internett: hvordan utnytte nettmediets potensial? | Lisa Sjursen

  30. Pingback: Utnytt mennesket | tigerrikke

  31. Pingback: Kvalitet fremfor kvantitet…..eller? | Elise Slåttsveen

  32. Pingback: Nyhetsredaksjoner og nettmediets potensial | eirik tonning refleksjonsblogg

  33. Pingback: Kvalitet over kvantitet | lenesj94

  34. Pingback: Hvordan kan nyhetsredaksjonene tjene på nettets potensial? | Iselin Larsen

  35. Pingback: livet på KOM109

  36. Pingback: Frankenstein om nettmediets potensial | SunroadW

  37. Pingback: 7. De nye kildene | Refleksjonsblogg

  38. Pingback: UTNYTTE NETTMEDIET | Amalie Kvåle

  39. Pingback: Nettmediets fremtid | Benedicte Pettersen

  40. Pingback: Den store kløfta | En blondines bekjennelser

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s