So here’s The Guardian’s crowdsourcing tool for MPs’ expenses. If you’ve not already, you should have a play: it’s a dream. There are over 77,000 documents to get through – and in less than 24 hours users have gone through over 50,000 of those. You wonder how long it took The Telegraph to get that far.
Meanwhile, that process is doing much more than just finding ‘stories’. It’s generating data: the date, the amount, the type of expense, the type of document. When this stage is finished, The Guardian will have a database that will allow people to filter, mix and combine the expenses data in different ways.
It’s also about telling a ‘story’ in a different way. There’s an element of game mechanics in the site – that progress bar (shown above) compels you to bring the site to completion (it strangely reminds me of the Twitter game Spymaster). This makes it more engaging than a made-for-print exclusive – as I wrote about Help Me Investigate, this isn’t ‘citizen journalism’: it’s micro-volunteering. And when you volunteer, you tend to engage.
And when you treat news as a platform rather than a destination, then people tend to spend more time on your site, so there’s an advertising win there.
Finally, we may see more stories, we may see interesting mashups, and this will give The Guardian an edge over the newspaper that bought the unredacted data – The Telegraph. When – or if – they release their data online, you can only hope the two sets of data will be easy to merge.
Pingback: Let the expenses data war commence: Telegraph begins its document drip feed | Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog
Pingback: The Guardian and MPs’ Expenses: Loving the Crowd : Dan Wilson's Blog
Pingback: The Guardian’s tool to crowdsource MP’s expenses data:: 21stnews
Pingback: The Guardian, Daily Telegraph and BBC: Lessons in Crowdsourcing « Jon Bernstein
Pingback: Meanwhile, A.nnotate puts all MPs expense PDFs online for free annotation | Online Journalism Blog
Pingback: Let the expenses data war commence: Telegraph begins its document drip feed | DAILYMAIL
Pingback: Links for 2009-06-19 [del.icio.us] « iThinkEducation.net!
Pingback: Why journalism may become software development « Freelance Unbound
This is a good interface, but the volunteerism seems to have dried up less than halfway through the project. Do any Guardianistas reading have lessons they’d like to share with the group?
Good point. Figures as of today (July 2): We have 457,153 pages of documents. 22,668 of you have reviewed 194,270 of them. Only 262,883 to go…
Will try to track this…
Pingback: More crowdsourcing from the Guardian and NYT - this time on Iran | Online Journalism Blog
Pingback: St Petersburg Times: cautiously embracing the web, assiduously reporting Scientology | Online Journalism Blog
Update: as of today (Oct 13) “458,832 pages of documents. 24,078 of you have reviewed 212,807 of them. Only 246,025 to go…”
Pingback: Stuff I’ve seen June 16th through June 19th | Podnosh
Pingback: How to stand out from the crowd-sourcing « Media matters
Pingback: MCJ 105 Newspaper Workshop Guest Lecture Resources « SivekMedia.com
Pingback: Crowdsourcing investigative journalism: a case study (part 1) | Online Journalism Blog
Pingback: The Fundamental Problem | Digital Tonto
Pingback: El poder ciudadano: Caso The Guardian | Texto casi Diario
Exactly what I was searching for, appreciate it for posting .
Pingback: Digital Scholarship day of ideas: data [2] » PJ Evans
Pingback: Crowdsourcing investigative journalism: a case study (part 1) | Online Journalism Blog
Pingback: Come si insegna data journalism in Europa
Pingback: No, I’m not abandoning the term “storytelling”, Alberto — just the opposite (and here’s why) | Online Journalism Blog