While I’m on the subject of Freedom of Information, here’s an odd story in the recent onslaught of anti-FOI press releases, from Avon and Somerset Police.
The police force is just one of many public bodies recently to moan about “bizarre and comical” FOI requests*. They claim that Freedom Of Information cost the body over half a million pounds last year. But can we trust their calculations?
Here’s how they say they arrived at their figure of £514,620:
That’s an average cost of £540.
Now, here’s the guidance on costs from the Information Commissioner:
“The cost limit for complying with a request or a linked series of requests from the same person or group is set at £450 for [non central] public authorities.”
So somehow Avon and Somerset have arrived at an average cost per request which is higher than the maximum cost for FOI requests.
How? Well, firstly the 18 hours “average” they mention is actually the maximum time that can be spent on an FOI request. So either every requester is somehow managing to hit that magical maximum, or they cannot calculate an average.
Worse, the £30 cost per hour is higher than they are supposed to charge.
According to the Ministry of Justice:
“£25 is the standard hourly rate that all authorities must use to calculate the staff costs of answering requests.”
Perhaps we need an FOI request to find out why Avon and Somerset Police are charging so much to answer FOI requests, and the calculations they used to arrive at an ‘average’?
UPDATE: It seems someone did exactly that:
*Apparently it’s “bizarre and comical” to ask how many police officers failed a physical. The answer is one in ten.
Reblogged this on Dave Toomer and commented:
Some interesting observations from Paul Bradshaw on anti-Freedom of Information moans.
Pingback: Did St Albans Council give misleading figures on FOI requests from police – and could other authorities be doing the same? | Online Journalism Blog
Pingback: Now a police force is using Buzzfeed to publicise odd FOI requests | Online Journalism Blog