How will other newspapers react to The Guardian offering a million articles to developers for free as part of its Open Platform?
If their website terms & conditions are anything to go by, they have a long way to go to embrace the internet.
It’s fairly standard for any publication to forbid people from copying its material. But some papers have gone so far with their site T&Cs that you’re not allowed to link to – or even read – their websites. The quotes below are all from the sites’ T&Cs (and all seem to conflict with their ’share’ buttons, such as the one enabling the Times to top the StumbleUpon league).
Daily Mirror: don’t link to us
Clause 2.1: “You also agree not to deep-link … to the Site for any purpose, unless specifically authorised by MGN Ltd to do so.”
Daily Mail: don’t link to us
“You may not provide a link to this web site from any other web site without first obtaining Associated’s prior written consent.”
The Sun: don’t link to us
Clause 10: “Unauthorised linking to the website is prohibited”
Telegraph: OK as of 3pm
This used to say “you must not deep-link to … any part of the Site without our prior written consent. ” But within 5 hours of my pointing this out on twitter, they had deleted it.
Independent: confused
On the one hand: “Third parties are permitted to link to stories within INM websites, using the URL and quoting the headline and the source website.” On the other: “Third parties must not deep-link to … any part of the Website. ”
FT: don’t read at work
Only read it for personal reasons, not for business ones: “If you are using FT.com in an “at work” capacity … and your use extends beyond personal, non-commercial use then you should contact FT’s Content Sales Team at FTSales.Support@ft.com to discuss your business requirements.” Do they apply this rule to the paper, too?
Times: don’t link to us
“unauthorised … linking to the Website is prohibited”.
Originally posted here.
13 Comments
That’s hysterical.
A URI being a Uniform Resource Identifier and a URL being a Uniform Resource Locator as they are it is not possible to “copyright”, “Trade Mark” or otherwise own the path name of your pages do to the prior art of the WWW system being claimable by Tim Burners-Lee of the W3 consortium.
They can forbid it all they like and it will still be legal.
I bet they paid a lot each for that mumbo jumbo.
That’s crazy! Now maybe we can understand why so many newspapers are going out of business.
*please do not read anyone else’s newspaper and that includes you on the tube reading the headlines of the guy opposite’s paper*
This is not the death of the media – merely a rationalisation.
Nice catch. Hilarious!
And if you see one of our journalists, you’re not allowed to look at them. Or our building.
Thanks for pointing these out Paul. Most thought provoking as usual from your blog. As Matt says above, they can none of them enforce it.
That’s incredible – I had no idea.
I can recall a time when we took the Ts&Cs to heart and actually phoned the publications for permission to link to a piece of client coverage on ther site. I mean, how dare we drive extra traffic their way.
Wow, I really thought UK newspapers had moved beyond such silly policies. Here I was thinking newspapers had improved their linking policies as of late, but I guess we still need DONA’s Link Manifesto to be spread far and wide:
http://kristinelowe.blogs.com/kristine_lowe/2009/03/why-we-need-the-link-manifesto-more-than-ever.html
Discussion should be made with those worried newspaper editors.
Many people are willing to prevent print journalism for dying, Twitter can replicate Google YouTube success in helping TV and movie maker / film artists to promote or increase audience/viewers.
They want traffic, Twitter can give them traffic, so lets sit down together and discuss how those traffic numbers can be made and converted to ads & subscription .
haha how wierd, it doesnt sound like they have grasped the rules of the internet at all.
Lol, I thought I can link to any sites I want from my websites.
its what you get when you letter lawyers who understand nothing near the internet
they all probably cut and pasted it form the same source materila anyway
5 Trackbacks
[...] Journalism Blog compares the openness of UK newspaper websites (laughably, most have T&Cs which forbid ‘unauthorised [...]
[...] great blog post from Malcolm Coles in the aftermath of the Guardian presenting their “Open Platform” [...]
[...] Newspaper sites: do not link to us [...]
[...] Newspaper sites: do not link to us, OnlineJournalismBlog [...]
[...] Daily Mail and Daily Mirror have joined the Daily Telegraph in scrapping their bans on other websites linking to them without prior written [...]