Is networked journalism more passive?

Last week I spoke at the BBC College of Journalism’s Future of Journalism conference about the future newsroom, and the News Diamond specifically. Chair Louise Minchin asked the following question: did these new production processes mean journalists would become more passive?

It is a great question. On the surface that’s what would appear to be happening: in posting alerts and blog drafts you are inviting the input of the audience and therefore being more reactive.

But that’s only half the story. Journalists who grapple with social media have to be more active in many other ways: digging up stories and leads remains important but thinking you have the definitive version is increasingly problematic.

Posting Twitter alerts and blog drafts rather than just a finished ‘package’ means a little more work, a little less passivity. The payback is feedback.

Ultimately the production team has become increasingly porous, involving experts, witnesses, accidental contributors, and anyone else who can add something valuable (what I’ve previously called Distributed Journalism).

As journalists we used to be active in seeking those people out – and we used reliable, often official, channels to do that, meaning we were often too reliant on particular sources. Now sources are increasingly coming to us and the work is in making ourselves visible, accessible and trustworthy; and in filtering and verifying the information they provide.

That’s not ‘more passive’ journalism, it’s getting out of your silos and making contact; it’s moving from being a conduit to a stimulator. It’s moving from a linear production process to a networked one, and too few journalists are doing it.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Is networked journalism more passive?

  1. Marta from herbs for menopause

    I agree, that this problem has two sides, so I think, that from the one hand, it is very hard to say, that journalism became more passive, because I know a lot of journalists, who are really try to do their best, but it is just a few people, so I cant say it about journalism in general.

    Reply
  2. Richard Kendall

    Journalism is evolving as you say, the tip-off and information and reaction can come from a variety of sources by a variety of means now, the journalists job certainly isn’t any easier.

    Journalists still have to know their patch or speciality, being able to quickly sift through and verify all the feedback and tweets etc. and precis down for multimedia output.

    Exciting and empowering at the same time as being a difficult adjustment for news media organisations.

    Reply
  3. Pingback: BBC Future of Journalism day 1: some reflections | Online Journalism Blog

  4. Pingback: Is networked journalism more passive? | Online Journalism Blog | theaudiosecrets

  5. Pingback: Notes from a Teacher - Monday squibs

  6. Pingback: On networked journalism « For Samford Crimson journalists

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.