Cross-posted from the BBC College of Journalism blog:
Last week my experiment in running a blog entirely through a Facebook Page quietly came to the end of its allotted four weeks. It’s been a useful exercise, and I’m going to adapt the experiment slightly. Here’s what I’ve learned:
It suits emotive material
The most popular posts during that month were simple links that dealt with controversy – Isle of Wight council talking about withdrawing accreditation if a blogger refused to pre-moderate comments; and the wider issue of being denied access to public documents or meetings on the basis of blogging.
This isn’t a shock – research into Facebook tends to draw similar conclusions about the value of ‘social’ content.
That said, it’s hard to draw firm conclusions because the Insights data only gives numbers on posts after June 9 (when I posted a book chapter as a series of Notes), and the network effects will have changed as the page accumulated Likes.
UPDATE: Scrolling down the page each update does have impressions and interaction data on it in light grey – I’m not sure why these are not included in the Insights data (perhaps that service only kicks in after a certain number of Likes). But they do confirm that links get much higher traffic than Notes.
It requires more effort than most blogs
With most blogging it’s quite easy to ‘just do it’ and then figure out the bells and whistles later. With a Facebook Page I think a bit of preparation goes a long way – especially to avoid problems later on.
Firstly, there’s the choice whether to start one from scratch or convert an existing Facebook account into a Page.
Secondly, there’s the page name itself: at first you can edit this, but after 100 Likes you can’t. That leaves my ‘Paul Bradshaw’s Online Journalism Blog on FB for 1 month‘ looking a bit silly 5 weeks later. (It would be nice if Facebook warned you that this was happening)
Thirdly, if you want write more than 420 characters, you’ll need to use Notes (ideally, when logged on as the Page itself, which will result in the Note being auto-posted to the wall). And if you want to link phrases without leaving littering the note with ugly URLs, you’ll need to use HTML code.
Next, there’s integration with other online presences. Here are the apps I used:
- RSS Graffiti (for auto-posting RSS feeds from elsewhere)
- Slideshare (adds a new tab for your presentations on that site)
- Cueler YouTube (pulls new updates from your YouTube account)
- Tweets to Pages (pulls from your Twitter account into a new tab)
There’s also Smart Twitter for Pages which publishes page updates to Twitter; or you can use Facebook’s own Twitter page to link pages to Twitter.
Finally, I was thankful that I had used a Feedburner account for the Online Journalism Blog RSS feed. That allowed me to change the settings so that subscribers to the blog would still receive updates from the Facebook page (which also has an RSS feed) – and change it back afterwards.
It’s not suited for anything you might intend to find later
Although Vadim Lavrusik pointed out that you can find the Facebook page through Google or Facebook’s own search, individual posts are rather more difficult to track down.
The lack of tags and categories also make it difficult to retrieve updates and notes – and highlight the problems for search engine optimisation.
This created a curious tension: on the one hand, short term traffic to individual posts was probably higher than I would normally get on the blog outside Facebook. On the other, there was little opportunity for long term traffic: there was no footprint of inbound links for Google to follow.
This may not be a problem for local, hard news organisations which have a rapid turnover of content, no need to rank in Google News, and little value in the archives.
But there are too many drawbacks for most to move (as Rockville Central’s blog recently did) completely to Facebook. It simply leaves you too isolated, too ephemeral, and too vulnerable to changes in Facebook’s policies.
Part of a network strategy
So in short, while it’s great for short term traffic, it’s bad for traffic long-term. It’s better for ongoing work and linking than more finished articles. It shouldn’t be viewed in isolation from the rest of the web, but rather as one more prong in a distributed strategy: just as I tweet some things, Tumblelog others, and just share or bookmark others, Facebook Pages fit in somewhere amidst all of that.
Now I just need to keep on working out exactly how.
Paul, I’m curious – can you export your notes from Facebook and take them with you to a new system or is all the content locked in?
The point you make about being subjected to Facebook’s changes worries me. If WordPress makes a change you simply cannot abide by or live with – you can move.
If you invest a lot of time and effort into your content and can’t move it around freely that has got to be a massive sticking point. (Even if you can export posts – you won’t be able to take direct wall posts / status updates I expect?)
I’m not aware of how you can export notes. Amusingly, this Facebook ‘help’ page on the subject of “importing and exporting” notes only mentions the word export in the headline – http://www.facebook.com/help/?page=818
Some better answers here: http://www.linkedin.com/answers/technology/web-development/TCH_WDD/204170-8264916
But still, no easy solutions – help welcomed…
A couple of quick notes:
1. Facebook does warn you when creating a Page that you won’t be able to change it after more than 100 likes 🙂
2. The only solution to exporting notes I am aware of is through RSS. You can pull the feed of a specific Page via RSS.
Ah – missed that warning. Anyway, better delivered when actually nearing, or just passing 100.
Pingback: The Social Media World | Check It Web Design Blog
Pingback: This Week in Review: What Google+ could do for news, and Murdoch’s News of the World gets the ax » Nieman Journalism Lab » Pushing to the Future of Journalism