Tre flere vinkler som oftest brukes til å fortelle datahistorier: utforskere, sammenhenger og metadatahistorier

I et tidligere innlegg skrev jeg om fire av vinklene som oftest brukes til å fortelle historier om data. I denne andre delen ser jeg på de tre øvrige vinklene: historier som fokuserer på sammenhenger; ‘metadata’-vinkler som fokuserer på dataenes fravær, dårlige kvalitet eller innsamling — og utforskende artikler som blander flere vinkler eller gir en mulighet til å bli kjent med selve dataene.

7 vanlige vinkler for datahistorier

Omfang: 'Så stort er problemet'
Endring/stillstand: ‘Dette øker/synker/blir ikke bedre’
Rangering: ‘De beste/verste/hvor vi rangerer’
Variasjon: "Geografisk lotteri" 
Utforske: Reportasjer, interaktivitet og kunst
Relasjoner/avmystifisering: ‘Ting er forbundet’ — eller ikke; nettverk og strømmer av makt og penger
Metadata: ‘Bekymringer rundt data’; ‘Manglende data’, ‘Få tak i dataene’
Continue reading

This is what happened when I asked journalism students to keep an ‘AI diary’

Last month I wrote about my decision to use an AI diary as part of assessment for a module I teach on the journalism degrees at Birmingham City University. The results are in — and they are revealing.

AI diary screenshots, including AI diary template which says:
Use this document to paste and annotate all your interactions with genAI tools. 

Interactions should include your initial prompt and response, as well as follow up prompts (“iterations”) and the responses to those. Include explanatory and reflective notes in the right hand column. Reflective notes might include observations about potential issues such as bias, accuracy, hallucinations, etc. You can also explain what you did outside of the genAI tool, in terms of other work. 

At least some of the notes should include links to literature (e.g. articles, videos, research) that you have used in creating the prompt or on reflecting on it. You do not need to use Harvard referencing - but the link must go directly to the material. See the examples on Moodle for guidance.

To add extra rows place your cursor in the last box and press the Tab key on your keyboard, or right-click in any row and select ‘add new row’.
Excerpts from AI diaries

What if we just asked students to keep a record of all their interactions with AI? That was the thinking behind the AI diary, a form of assessment that I introduced this year for two key reasons: to increase transparency about the use of AI, and to increase critical thinking.

Continue reading

How to reduce the environmental impact of using AI

Generative AI: reducing environmental impact
Disable AI or switch tool
Compare AI vs non-AI
Compare models
Prompt planning
Prompt design and templating
Measuring and reviewing
Run locally

One of the biggest concerns over the use of generative AI tools like ChatGPT is their environmental impact. But what is that impact — and what strategies are there for reducing it? Here is what we know so far — and some suggestions for good practice.

What exactly is the environmental impact of using generative AI? It’s not an easy question to answer, as the MIT Technology Review’s James O’Donnell and Casey Crownhart found when they set out to find some answers.

“The common understanding of AI’s energy consumption,” they write, “is full of holes.”

Continue reading

Die umgekehrte Pyramide des Datenjournalismus: Vom Datensatz zur Story

Die umgekehrte Pyramide des Datenjournalismus
Ideen entwickeln
Daten sammeln
Reinigen
Kontextualisieren
Kombinieren
Fragen
Kommunizieren

Datenjournalistische Projekte lassen sich in einzelne Schritte aufteilen – jeder einzelne Schritt bringt eigene Herausforderungen. Um dir zu helfen, habe ich die “Umgekehrte Pyramide des Datenjournalismusentwickelt. Sie zeigt, wie du aus einer Idee eine fokussierte Datengeschichte machst. Ich erkläre dir Schritt für Schritt, worauf du achten solltest, und gebe dir Tipps, wie du typische Stolpersteine vermeiden kannst.

(Auch auf Englisch, Spanisch, Finnisch, Russisch and Ukrainisch verfügbar.)

Continue reading

9 takeaways from the Data Journalism UK conference

Attendees in a lecture theatre with 'data and investigative journalism conference 2025 BBC Shared Data Unit' on the screen.

Last month the BBC’s Shared Data Unit held its annual Data and Investigative Journalism UK conference at the home of my MA in Data Journalism, Birmingham City University. Here are some of the highlights…

Continue reading

Teaching journalism students generative AI: why I switched to an “AI diary” this semester

The Thinker status
Image by Fredrik Rubensson CC BY-SA 2.0

As universities adapt to a post-ChatGPT era, many journalism assessments have tried to address the widespread use of AI by asking students to declare and reflect on their use of the technology in some form of critical reflection, evaluation or report accompanying their work. But having been there and done that, I didn’t think it worked.

So this year — my third time round teaching generative AI to journalism students — I made a big change: instead of asking students to reflect on their use of AI in a critical evaluation alongside a portfolio of journalism work, I ditched the evaluation entirely.

Continue reading

Why I’m no longer saying AI is “biased”

TLDR; Saying “AI has biases” or “biased training data” is preferable to “AI is biased” because it reduces the risk of anthropomorphism and focuses on potential solutions, not problems.

Searches for "AI bias" peaked in 2025. In March 2025 twice as many searches were made for "AI bias" compared to 12 months before.
Click image to explore an interactive version

For the last two years I have been standing in front of classes and conferences saying the words “AI is biased” — but a couple months ago, I stopped.

As journalists, we are trained to be careful with language — and “AI is biased” is a sloppy piece of writing. It is a thoughtless cliche, often used without really thinking what it means, or how it might mislead.

Because yes, AI is “biased” — but it’s not biased in the way most people might understand that word.

Continue reading

Google Sheets has a new AI function — how does it perform on classification tasks?

A new AI function is being added to Google Sheets that could make most other functions redundant. But is it any good? And what can it be used for? Here’s what I’ve learned in the first week…

AI has been built into Google Sheets for some time now in the Clippy-like form of Gemini in Sheets. But Google Sheets’s AI function is different.

Available to a limited number of users for now, it allows you to incorporate AI prompts directly into a formula rather than having to rely on Gemini to suggest a formula using existing functions. 

At the most basic level that means the AI function can be used instead of functions like SUM, AVERAGE or COUNT by simply including a prompt like “Add the numbers in these cells” (or “calculate an average for” or “count”). But more interesting applications come in areas such as classification, translation, analysis and extraction, especially where a task requires a little more ‘intelligence’ than a more literally-minded function can offer.

I put the AI function through its paces with a series of classification challenges to see how it performed. Here’s what happened — and some ways in which the risks of generative AI need to be identified and addressed.

Continue reading

How do I get data if my country doesn’t publish any?

Spotlight photo by Paul Green on Unsplash

In many countries public data is limited, and access to data is either restricted, or information provided by the authorities is not credible. So how do you obtain data for a story? Here are some techniques used by reporters around the world.

Continue reading